all 3 comments

[–]IkeConn 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Take a look in the mirror. See that person? They posted stupid shit and it got them banned.

[–]send_nasty_stuff 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

So you were banned from two subs?

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Could we chill with the rules there are five people on this site.

Ed has a point. If we had a group chat that was just all 94 members of the forum,and a few of them took it upon themselves to police the others that would seem a little ridiculous.

I just got banned on s/asksaidit for no reason

Lets not be dramatic now. You post a lot of garbage.

The question isn't really whether the rules weren't violated, it's if anyone should bother following the rules with so few people. Or maybe they should be refined in light of certain realties.

I don't know if this recent selective execution of the rules is in anyone's best interests. Seems deader than ever. Can we see the convo that led to this particular circumstance? Who do we blame for not listening to me?

You ever see those complaints "I see 27 comments but then I click and there's nothing!" And they bitch cause they blocked that person and they want to see that conversation. But they also want that person banned forever. They don't want to miss out on comments but they don't want the person who generated the contents.

This is why democracy doesn't work