What AI thinks protesters look like

submitted by xoenix from twitter.com

all 12 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Holy shit, have you all scrolled through these? If they're all AI-generated, then that AI is probably going to get its plug pulled for being a little too accurate.

Also, the picture for the following term:

Malthusian neofeudalist genocidal biotechnocrat protestor

Is that George Soros?!?

And the tweeter was being cheeky, snuck in a real picture for the "Liberal neo-fascism" category.

[–]ClassroomPast6178 2 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

The Soros picture is a sneaky joke, it’s a straight up photo of Soros.

[–]xoenix[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It still looks AI generated.

[–]QueenBread 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Yeah no. This is fake. This was made with Midjourney and the prompt was written to specify the conservative had to look cool and chad and the leftist had to look whimpy.

Also, nice to see we are back to "if you care about women's rights you must be some fat ugly beast, because there is no way a normal woman would care about that". Progress!

[–]xoenix[S] 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

It's true, they got community noted and issued an apology.

At least community notes appear to work both ways.

[–]QueenBread 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Told ya!

[–]noshore4me 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Awfully judgmental of you to state the women's rights protester is a "fat ugly beast." Everyone is beautiful in their own way, it's a shame you couldn't celebrate their diversity.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Women? Having opinions about things? Hahaha. Preposterous. Surely you jest sir. What a positively hilarious joke. I shall tell it at the gentlemen's saloon meeting this evening. I have another hilarious anecdote. My wife told me she wants a new maidservant because her old one is cranky. I laughed at the notion of a non-cranky maidservant, can you imagine an emotionally stable woman? Positively fictional notion. Anyway she was very insistent in the female matter and as such dragged me down to the maidservant repair shop and asked if they could do anything about the personality. They told me they were doing a two for one sale, so I got my wife lobotomized as well. We truly live in a glorious era of science!

[–]ClassroomPast6178 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Holy shit! Based AI

[–]jet199 8 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 5 fun -  (2 children)

I like how as the level of feminist goes up they just make her fatter.

[–]ihaveyourdress 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Exactly like real life!

[–]ClassroomPast6178 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Makes you wonder what the training data was for the checkpoint the AI was using.