TRANSGENDERWhen you think you’re being so very clever but it turns out that you’re a raging moron - “Is this a cis or trans man?”

submitted by ClassroomPast6178 from x.com

all 13 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]ClassroomPast6178[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

You can actually sense the cope and seethe through the internet as every reply clocks the lady with a useless tube of meat in her crotch.

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

It makes me almost tempted to make a Twitter account to enjoy the show. Almost.

[–]Adventurous_Ad6212 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I had a twitter account once I used to post woke word salad on it the. I would screen cap it and post it on Reddit. Easiest trolling ever.

[–]LtGreenCo 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Did you know until the early 50s, pink was a boy's color and blue was for girls.

Sure okay then if gender is a social construct, why the fuck are you retards trying to convince people you were born male/female-brained. Those arguments are mutually exclusive.

[–]ClassroomPast6178[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That’s fashion motherfucker, fashion and IIRC throughout history boys and girls used to wear pink and it was only in the 1920s that blue started to be pushed towards girls, but it flipped to boys around the 1940s. The reason blue wasn’t used for either boys or girls was that until the arrival of aniline dyes, blue dyes were expensive as hell.

It’s also worth pointing out that until the end of the 19th century all children below the age of about five were dressed in dresses to make toilet training easier and boys got a little party when they got their first pair of trousers/breeches.

People also forget that until the 1950s there was no such thing as a teenager. You were either a little kid or you were expected to act like an adult. So when they talk about children’s clothes of more than seventy years ago they are talking about children under-10, coz those 11 year olds were dressing like adults.

I fucking hate these arguments, so what if boys wore pink? Nothing stopping you dressing how you want, you just don’t get to call yourself the opposite sex and entering their spaces and reserved events etc, suck it up buttercup.

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Those arguments are mutually exclusive.

If these asswits were capable of the logic to realize this, then they wouldn't be spouting any of that genderwoo shit to begin with. Alas, little details like coherent arguments are beyond them and they just throw out whatever buzzword-laden ball of shit is required at any given moment to support their position.

[–]jet199 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think for a lot of the theyfabs (BPD troon women) the point is to queer society rather than make true trans thing. They just want to sow chaos and shred all meaning to everything in the belief society is evil and oppressing them. So arguing there aren't pink or blue brains won't really work with them. They are blank slateists who believe everyone should be allowed to choose everything about their own identity and body and their support and identification with troons is based on that, not because they agree with born in the wrong body rhetoric.

The way to argue with them would be to burst their marxist posthuman fantasy bubble.

[–]alladd 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I like if you go up the thread, the person debating this was also debating the original poster too. They're eating their own.

[–]OuroborosTheory 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

a mass debate, you say?

[–]TiredTrenders 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What a clown. Pixelated & cropped the image but didn't edit out the obvious skin graft scar on the left forearm. Delusional is nowhere near an apt descriptor for these weirdos.

[–]Wanderingthehalls 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's so weird that they post these utterly obvious pictures of people that are the absolute 'best' looking results of transition but are still painfully, obviously not the sex they are trying to be. And that's in a still photo, angled, lit and probably filtered for maximum effectiveness. Our brains are wired to recognise things that aren't right. There is a person who works in a shop I go to regularly who is either a transman or a very unfortunate man. They are about 5'7"/5'8" so not freakishly tall for a woman or small for a man. And a bit overweight and always wearing a baggy fleece so their body shape isn't super obvious. They have short hair gelled forward in a way that men sometimes do to cover up a receding hair line and straggly facial hair/crappy short beard. And yet, even before I heard this person speak or saw them walk, my brain clocked weirdness the instant I looked at 'him.' It honestly felt like the scenery shifted or my eyes couldn't quite settle on what I was seeing. Then 'he' spoke and, while a lot of transmen I've heard on tv/online have a voice that's either like a pubescent boy with a newly cracking voice or a very camp effeminate gay man, this person's voice is more feminine than that. Not like a woman's natural voice but nothing even close to male. A few days ago I saw this person walking to work and my eyes were immediately drawn to them even in the distance, before I recognised who it was, as their stride didn't match their male-ish appearance.

We evolved to notice and pay attention to incongruence because it's a signifier of possible threat. And I wonder what type of reaction this person provokes in people who aren't terminally online and don't have the knowledge to conclude that they are interacting with a young woman who's had a mastectomy (because I've clocked women wearing binders and that's not what this looks like) and taking testosterone. Because even knowing what this person most probably is, I instinctually feel weirded out by them and have a strong desire to finish our interaction and move away. Logically I feel a mixture of pity for the messed up girl who has destroyed her body and probably has a lowered their life expectancy and long term quality of life. And a wariness of somehow provoking an irrational outburst. And also some guilt in case I'm wrong and I'm having a massive internal negative reaction to a young man with some sort of DSD. Though statistically, I know it's much more likely to be a transman.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

People should post their own faces, and ask the same question.

"Hey look at me. I'm a mime. Can you guys tell that I'm a mime? Does my voice sound like a mime's voice? Just saying..."

[–]UncleWillard56 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Must be trans as no straight man would be involved in that kind of tomfuckery.