Claudine Gay accused of botching study that won Stanford tenure

submitted by xoenix from dailymail.co.uk

all 8 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Tom_Bombadil 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

She's trapped in a maoist struggle session.

If she apologizes then she's 100% finished; beyond political recovery.

She's a former insider, so I'm confident she recognizes what's actually going on. She's familiar with the tactic, so I doubt she'll crack under pressure.

Her steady resistance to this struggle session should be the model that everyone should copy if you find yourself in this situation.

The moment you give in, and apologize then they own you, and you'll never recover.

You lose face with your supporters, because you broke under pressure.

You never had any social respect from the opposition, and when they break you then they'll cite your defeat forever as a massive victory. They'll desecrate your pubic image.

The only option is to stand your ground, and never give in.

[–]xoenix[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I mean she ousted two other professors who were politically problematic for her. She's not just a former insider, she's a grand inquisitor.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

She's no slouch maoist infiltrator.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

When you play with fire eventually you'll get burned.

[–]LtGreenCo 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In 2002 she refused two professor's requests for her code and data used in her research. Then later this fact and other criticisms were mysteriously scrubbed from public record.

She and the people that helped her to skirt by are just a drop in the bucket of far-left ideologues who have infiltrated and corrupted Academia. They have been allowed to completely ignore scientific rigor just as long as their conclusions fit the narrative. How many times have we seen bullshit social justice research get published in journals with little to no peer scrutiny? It's happening more and more and if we allow it to continue we are probably heading for another dark age.

[–]AriShekelsteinDDS 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Most blackety black “academics” are frauds. This isn’t a surprise. The particular one in question just happened to piss off the people you are not allowed to talk about.

[–]JulienMayfair 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The unwritten rule for a long time in academia has been that you are not allowed to question the conclusions of a person of color without opening yourself up to charges of racism, but we seem to have reached a tipping point where the sacred protected status of people like Claudine Gay is starting to crumble. The thing is that there are a LOT more Claudine Gays out there in academia.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

FREE GAY FROM THE KIKES