Nuclear device detonated in Ukraine, apparently within a NATO supplied ammo depot, blown up by Russian forces.

submitted by Alphix from youtu.be

all 46 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]neolib 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

YouTube video's original title:

Putin 'strikes' NATO-supplied ammunition depot; Explosions shake Ukraine's Khmelnytskyi

Thread:

2011: "30,000 tons of ammunition are stored three kilometers from Khmelnytskyi"

2017: "Nearby are warehouses where aviation ammunition has been stored since 1949"

it was an old storage facility with old soviet ammunition

https://twitter.com/GeoConfirmed/status/1657813584536125442

[–]Alphix[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Here before they get erased: https://bnn.network/watch-now/radiation-nightmare-unleashed-khmelnytskyi-ukraine-battles-environmental-catastrophe-after-targeted-attack/

https://twitter.com/djuric_zlatko/status/1657829568885956616

ONCE MORE: Gamma radiation only comes from a nuclear reaction.

[–]In-the-clouds 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Archived:

bnn.network: https://archive.is/lcZnm

twitter.com: https://archive.is/ZArHI

[–]Alphix[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

THANK YOU!!

[–]zyxzevn 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

No. There is no "flash".
Here is an overview https://imgur.com/gallery/Tptup with flash and shock-wave.

The explosion in the video is possible a fuel-air explosive. Or secondary explosions.

Remember Massive explosion in Tianjin , China 2015?
https://i.imgur.com/WnHNjeX.mp4
The air fills with very flammable material, which then explode suddenly.
That is how secondary explosions can be immense.

[–]Alphix[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

The explosion is from an underground bunker. There was a flash, it was underground. What, you want it to wait until its eaten through the bunker to flash so you can see it?

Your "overview" from the 1950s of ABOVE-GROUND nukes is worthless.

No, it can't be a fuel-air explosion. They don't last for a minute and they can never come anywhere near the temperatures to create PLASMA.

Yes, I remember Tianjin, it was also a nuke disguised by smaller blasts so sheeple can't tell there is a nuclear war currently going on. Explain to me how tires were VAPORIZED at 300 meters from the center of blast with a chemical explosion. The tires were not BURNT, they were VAPORIZED.

I don't care about the SIZE of the explosion. They make fucking tiny yield nukes nowadays, unlike your 1950s "samples".

[–]zyxzevn 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Found this via https://t.me/VanessaBeeley/14647

☢️ It is worth noting that panicked reports are spreading in Ukrainian social networks that during the detonation of the ammunition depot in Khmelnitsky, a large batch of British depleted uranium tank ammunition, which had recently been brought to Ukraine together with Storm Shadow missiles, was also destroyed.

As a result of the huge explosion, particles of depleted uranium could have been dispersed in the Khmelnitsky region, which, given the experience of Yugoslavia and Iraq, could lead to an outbreak of cancer in the medium term.

There are already reports that the radiation background in Khmelnytsky has allegedly increased. We will wait for actual confirmation.

Check about the increase of the radiation background in Khmelnitsky. Indeed, after the strike at the ammunition depot, there is a significant jump. From 80-100 nanosieverts to 140-160 nanosieverts.

[–]Alphix[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Yes and you are stupid enough to believe that BURNING depleted Uranium will cause a rise in radioactivity as detected. Great job. Sorry u/zyxzevn but you are sounding very NPC right now.

[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It is just the latest news that I found. There is something going on, but it needs further investigation.

[–]Alphix[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I think you need information on the topic, rather than investigation into this event. The video is clear as day, when you know what to look for.

[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

For me it is clearly not a nuclear explosion. No flash. (= no x-rays)

[–]Alphix[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The device was INSIDE AN UNDERGROUND BUNKER. How could you see the flash????????????????????????????????????

[–]zyxzevn 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I have had a Fuel-air style explosion near my home. From dust that was very flammable, combined with oxidizer.
Yes it can be very destructive and is the closest to a nuke that we have, without being a nuke.
And what I saw, was not even a military version.

[–]Alphix[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I am VERY FUCKING WELL AWARE of the difference.

Have you heard about the CIA's statement: "Our mission will only be complete once everything Americans believe is absolutely false"? Yes, you have but there's no way that would make you question your beliefs.

[–]In-the-clouds 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

CIA's statement: "Our mission will only be complete once everything Americans believe is absolutely false"

Americans no longer believe in Jesus. Even most of those that claim to be Christian, or go to a man-made church, do not know him as he truly is. If they can separate man from his God and Savior, then the adversary has an easy time with him. Divide and conquer. America is lost and so watch it burn. But anyone reading this can be saved.... if they repent and turn to the real Jesus, the one who died on the cross and rose again, for all mankind.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

A swarm drones releases fuel for a thermobaric explosion that injures my protagonist and blows up his house killing his family in my Bittersweet Seeds story.

[–]zyxzevn 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I think thermobaric bomb has 2 explosion stages. One explosion spreads the fuel. The second ignites it.
I saw some real-world demonstrations from behind-the-press and some other channels.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Oh, that's fascinating and makes sense.

In my story a swarm of drones quickly penetrates a house, spread out, spin & spray, then boom.

[–]Alphix[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

u/JasonCarswell since you ask for an explanation, I'm not going to give you a Ph.D. in nuclear physics. We'll just use your eyes.

Look at this explosion. Look when there is a glowing column of gas under the mushroom cloud. That GLOWING gas is not "burning". Those are not FLAMES. That is what is called plasma: superheated matter that is ionised from the heat. Such heat cannot be made by chemical explosives. It is ONLY made inside nuclear reactions. This plasma rises, then falls again, still glowing, as it cools. That is not fuel nor gunpowder nor any other known explosive or combustible: those turn to light, heat and often also SMOKE. They don't keep glowing for a minute after the blast. Once again, look with your eyes: THOSE ARE NOT FLAMES, it's just GLOWING while floating in mid-air for a whole minute.

Moreover, look at that mushroom cloud: how long does it burn? Have you ever seen gunpowder burning for a whole minute? No, it blows up and it's done. Look up any and all conventional bomb designs: booooooom and it's over. No chemicals explode continuously for a minute.

I'm not saying this was ONLY a nuke. Obviously there's lots of other things blowing up in there: missiles, grenades, shells, whatever. And they've been doing this every single time in the past couple decades: explode some other shit, and then a nuke, hoping to disguise the nuclear nature of one of the multiple explosions, hoping that the sheeple will go: It's not because it makes a mushroom cloud that it's a nuke, you moron.

Well I'm not firstly talking about the mushroom cloud, I'm talking about the plasma column. Again, plasma is only created at temperatures that are way beyond the capabilities of any chemical explosion.

If you're going to argue, think about this: jet fuel VAPORIZES concrete from its heat. Correct?

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I don't want a PhD nor need your sass that takes more energy from you than me.
I just wanted to know what to look for. Your explanation is good. Thank you.
The tweet is great too.
I'm not a moron and I do know about mushroom clouds.
I wasn't arguing. I was seeking explaination.
Name calling should be beneath you.
But obviously you can't control yourself. Sad.

[–]Alphix[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I have not called you a single name in the previous post.

I get irked because this is a site where supposedly people are open to discussing things that Joe Average might have zero interest in, but in fact it looks like everybody's looking for their echo chamber. Yes, my assertions are disconcerting, even unnerving, because they are so outside of even conspiracy theorist circles. But I'm only making them because they're true. Now I'm not asking that everybody take me at my word for everything, but at some point, getting dismissed out of hand on such an important topic just because nobody else is talking about this is... Just plain wrong.

[–]In-the-clouds 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

That explanation made sense.

Do you think the 2020 Beirut port attack on their grain silos was a nuke?

[–]Alphix[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yes, it was! Of course there was a stockpile of fertilizers that also detonated, but yes, they put a nuke in there too. And in Yemen in 2015 which was the EXACT SAME scenario as we just had yesterday. And if you look at the blast in Yemen (I posted it somewhat recently) it should leave ABSOLUTELY NO doubt whatsoever that it was a nuke.

Here is the one in Yemen, check out the mega telltales of nuclear decay at 2:30:

https://odysee.com/@Knochenbrigade:c/saudi-tactical-nuclear-strike-on-yemen:4

[–]In-the-clouds 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The URL stamp in the video revealed an impressive collection of recorded explosions on YouTube

nuclear decay at 2:30

I saw some sparkles. The video you shared from Yemen shows an explosion that resembles the one in Khmelnitsky, Ukraine. Is that a column of plasma seen in both?

Yemen-1 Yemen-2

Khmelnitsky, Ukraine

~

Regarding the intro to the video, which claims to be to the glory of Jesus Christ, I don't believe it. The only thing Christians should glory in is what Jesus Christ did for us on the cross, and not what man destroys with his weapons. Jesus died for all nations and peoples and America will be destroyed, as prophesied by Jesus Christ in the book of Revelation. Babylon is fallen, is fallen! It has become a habitation of every evil spirit!

[–]Alphix[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yep, that's the plasma column. As for the stuff in one of the videos, I agree, it is out of place.

[–]Alphix[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

There are still a few with the missile used in Beirut clearly visible:

https://odysee.com/@MaatTV:6/Beirut-Explosion-Missile-Strike-Footage-:1

There's one where we also see the plane that shoots it, but I can't find it right now.

[–]In-the-clouds 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That was my first time seeing that video. Reminds me of the attack on the World Trade Center in 2011, how other videos emerged showing a different narrative than what the big news corporations showed.

[–]Alphix[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

Here you can CLEARLY see the plasma column, undeniable proof that there is indeed a nuclear device detonation:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcjzcErMdwQ

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Undeniable?
Show me a Geiger counter.

[–]Alphix[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

There was talk in the news about a radioactive event, but it's probably been all erased by now. Nobody wants the masses to know there's a nuclear war going on.

[–][deleted]  (12 children)

[removed]

    [–]Alphix[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

    You wish what.

    [–][deleted]  (10 children)

    [removed]

      [–]Vulptex[A] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

      Do not advocate violence on saidit.

      [–]In-the-clouds 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      We disagree on much, but on this point I can agree. The weapons of our warfare are not physical. Our weapon should always be brotherly love.... and the truth.

      Question: Will you also remind people to not kill Christians? Even when that is something ordered by the world governments? Christians are quickly becoming the most persecuted people all over the world, and most have no idea and don't even care. Until it's their turn.

      [–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Right now I can't say I agree that Christians are the most persecuted, outside of North Korea. This is an unusual time, and unfortunately I can see it ending soon. For the vast majority of history Christians have been the most persecuted people in the world, with Jews as a close second, and per human nature that will probably be returning soon. First the gnostics and prophets, then the protestants, and finally even the orthodox will be hunted down or infiltrated. And I fear that the obsession with sexuality and gender is a false flag operation meant to make otherwise-caring people be okay with that. Let's hope that "killing Christians" isn't an understatement, because there may well be far worse horrors in store for Christians.

      [–][deleted]  (4 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

        Yes you did, or at least heavily implied it. If I removed it because I don't like it, I would've removed a lot more than I did.

        [–][deleted]  (2 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

          It's a heavy implication of advocation. Enough to get in hot water with saidit's providers.

          [–]Alphix[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

          Listen. When you are an absolute ignoramus on a topic, you know what to do? SHUT THE FUCK UP instead of blathering your stupidity all over the place, demonstrating your nonexistent mental capacity for all to see. It does not benefit any discussion.

          If you have neurons, I suggest you learn something about PLASMA. And then maybe you'll get so far as PLASMA COLUMN FROM A NUCLEAR DETONATION. And then maybe, just maybe you'll be able to fire what passes for neurons in your head in something approximating the correct order to understand that there is in fact UNDENIABLE PROOF that there is indeed a nuclear detonation displayed in these videos.

          Same shit as what happened in the port in Lebanon a few years ago, and also in Yemen in 2015 and also in Ukraine in 2014, although footage from that one has become nigh impossible to find. Oh and there was also one in Tianjin, China. Yes, all these nukes are disguised by other explosions because their nuclear nature would be so plain to see that even drooling fucktards like you would readily see it.

          [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

          From just looking at this is it even possible to tell what kind of strike it is? I'm not saying it couldn't be a tactical nuke, I have no idea what size the mushroom clouds are.

          [–]Alphix[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

          Russia didn't use any nukes. That was from the ammo depot exploding. Therefore, NATO had positioned a nuke there for some purpose. A small, tactical nuke.

          [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

          Oh ok, I get it, wasn't thinking of it from that perspective. what would the benefit to NATO be?

          [–]Alphix[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

          I think to blow it up somewhere nearer the front and accuse Russia of being responsible. Probably say it was a false flag from Russia or some shit like that. Some sort of nuclear false flag has been theorized a LOT over the last year or so...

          [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

          I've always argued that if anyone was going to play games with nukes, it would be Putin. I just see him having more to gain with that firepower threat being on the table. But cards on the table, I'm not seeing Russia's right to the territory its occupying in Ukraine, just my opinion.

          [–]Alphix[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          It also makes no sense to nuke the territory you want to take. As a matter of fact, blowing up those DU shells in WESTERN Ukraine is a great idea, because having them used in central / eastern Ukraine would devastate the value of the most fertile farmland in the world, which Putin is conquering.

          But I agree, Russia are more likely to initiate large scale nuclear conflict with the West, IMHO.

          It's just that this time, Russia used a large number of drones, most of which got shot down by air defenses. You don't do that with nukes! :-P

          [–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

          Convenient that it was in an ammo depot.
          Was not likely a nuke - just a mushroom cloud from immense heat.

          [–]Alphix[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          I'm just TELLING you it's a nuke from the plasma column. You keep on tiny-minding me about the mushroom cloud. PLASMA requires temperatures that simply cannot ever be reached by combustion.

          [–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

          Actually, it was two mushroom clouds.