Continued from Part II
Senator Johnson (about 3:14): Let me enter a little data in here because we we hear about infection mortality rates and infinitesimally small percentages. I turned those into numbers. This is CDC's numbers, and John Ioannidis's numbers from Stanford, just got published. We're talking about medical necessity and stratification of risk, which we've totally ignored.
.
According to the CDC, if you're age 0-17, 20 of you per million will die from Covid. If you're over 65, 90k of you per million may die from Covid. John Ioannidis's numbers are somewhat similar: age 0-19, about 13 deaths per million; over 70, about 40k deaths.
.
So where should our response have been focused? With children? No one can tell you the long-term effects of these vaccines, it's unknowable because we haven't taken the time. With that lack of knowledge, it suggests you should use some caution, but we haven't.
There's a news story out of Vietnam, a 9th grader died after getting her second Pfizer dose. She had dizziness and difficulty breathing after her first dose but health care workers told her parents she should go ahead and get the second. So this is a 9th grader, doesn't have much risk from Covid and has a reaction from the first dose but let's give her the second dose anyway.
This is the reality that's being ignored by our federal health officials, by the legacy media, by Big Tech.
.
Dr. Malone (about 3:19:35): the data is clear, the vaccines are not protecting from the infection, replication and spread of Omicron. And the data is relatively clear and emerging that vaccination is enhancing the risk of infection, replication and spread.
Senator Johnson: asked about studies that show this?
.
Dr. Kheriarty: recent Ontario study about 2 weeks ago from a highly vaccinated region. Public health data for several weeks has shown higher Omicron cases in the vaccinated. The response was always, yes but a higher proportion of the population is vaccinated. So in this study, if you look not at total number of cases but case rates, cases per 100k, the vaccinated group was on a steeper incline.
Dr. Malone: Ontario is one example, there's multiple examples from Northern Europe, and Israel where they're seeing the 3rd and 4th jabs aren't helping.
.
Senator Johnson: why would that be?
.
Dr. Malone: talked about confounding variables and need for caution in interpreting the data but what we're seeing is a risk profile that's a function of the number of vaccine doses [there's increased risk of infection the more jabs].
.
Dr. Parks: One reason may be that the mRNA vaccines, which are a form of gene therapy, it induces a highly inflammatory response. They wanted to tamp this down so they modified the RNA so it changed the way it interacted with our toll-like receptors, which coordinate an inflammatory response to viruses, etc.
.
Dr. Malone: we've long known that one of the great risks is vaccine-enhanced disease. It's long been a problem with coronaviruses, it's compromised every prior coronavirus vaccine development effort and now we're seeing clinical data that's consistent with vaccine-enhanced disease. But as Dr. Risch will say, there are multiple confounding variables.
.
Dr. Risch: Public Health UK has actually published a statement about this in their Week 42 weekly report. People who had Covid and then get vaccinated have lower levels of nucleocapsid antibodies and since the vaccines don't address the nucleocapsid antigens, they only address the spike protein, it means they're doing something that damages the immune response in a more general way than what they do with the spike. It's not a theoretical issue, it's a real thing that's been observed by their testing.
.
Senator Johnson: This is the kind of discussion that should be occurring within these advisory panels.
Dr. Wiseman: We've raised these in front of advisory panels, I've raised them with the Israeli Ministry of Health. We submitted written documents to FDA and CDC on all of these issues.
.
Dr. McCullough: I want to say point out that the CDC and academic medical centers will say that the vaccines are associated with a reduction in hospitalization, even with Omicron. But it's only in US hospitals. Not in South Africa, or Germany or Denmark, the UK or Israel.
.
Americans should be asking why the vaccines work only against hospitalization but they don't work against [binary occurrence?] of the respiratory illness or reduce spread and they don't reduce mortality. And by the way, they reduce hospitalization in most studies in the US by 85%. How does that happen?
.
That is basically academic fraud, because these hospitalizations are not adjudicated, they're not telling us why the patients are hospitalized. And we've had multiple officials tell us that 40-60% of people coming to the hospital who test positive for Covid are not there for Covid. So we have a trumped up set of numbers.
.
And to make matters worse, our CDC has advised consistently that the unvaccinated get lots of testing, and the vaccinated actually refrain from testing. So the combination of not adjudicating hospitalizations and this asymmetric testing is creating a fraudulent data scheme in order to make the claim that the vaccinations are associated with a reduction in hospitalizations when in fact they're not. And that's why Israel is loaded with fully vaccinated people in the hospital with Covid 19, and so is Germany, the UK, etc.
.
Senator Johnson (about 3:30): asked Dr. Kory about the information systems in hospitals as it relates to vaccination status.
Dr. Kory: The constant refrain that everyone in the hospital is unvaccinatd. I think it's manipulated data, for the same purpose I've already talked about - they want to vaccinate, vaccinate, vaccinate. In this country, when you log in to the most popular health record, probably EPIC, there's only two statuses a patient can have - vaccinated or UNKNOWN. There is no category of unvaccinated. My hypothesis, which I can't prove, is that if you were vaccinated within that hospital or hospital system, it appears. If you went to a Walgreens or Rite-Aid or a private practice, it doesn't appear, i.e., it's unknown. I believe they are artificially, with great purpose, hiding the fact that many people in American hospitals are vaccinated. As Dr. McCullough said, why is US data so different from other countries and health systems that are revealing the underlying granular data in a transparent fashion?
.
Dr. Wiseman: I have a paper here that just came out about a week ago from the FDA, where they say there's at least a 16% non-capture of information on people who were vaccinated but are being called unvaccinated.
Pillar 3: Hospital Treatment
Senator Johnson (about 3:33): I want to talk about hospital care. What freedoms do you give up when you get admitted to the hospital and is this a new phenomenon or has it always been true? You hear of families taking hospitals to court to get them to administer one of the unnameable drugs and even under court order the hospitals won't do it. I'm the author of Right to Try legislation which gives patients and their doctors the right to try an unapproved drug and yet Americans haven't been able to access fully approved drugs with decades of safety profile. What has gone off the rails here?
Dr. Kheriarty was asked to talk about the rights of patients: Physicians have always appropriately been granted discretionary latitude to exercise their own medical judgment. There are treatment recommendations from medical societies, CDC, etc., but every patient is unique with unique factors that only the patient and doctor fully understand with sufficient depth to make difficult medical judgments.
.
This is the first time in my career where I've worried that someone was looking over my shoulder saying, are you giving the fluvoxamine for depression or are you giving it for Covid? Why should it matter? There are things hospital administrators do that have annoyed doctors for years but the kind of ham-stringing them from doing what they believe is best for their patient, which is their only responsibility, to be doing what's best for my patient and not be acting as the agent for a social program, a state program or any other interest.
.
Senator Johnson: So talk about the historic role of these agencies and their relationship to doctors and how did this change?
Dr. Kheriarty: They are advisory. The CDC is not the nation's SuperDoctor. The CDC is not a medical organization, it's a public health organization focused on infectious disease spread and they can do modeling and epidemiology and give recommendations on that issue, but in terms of how to treat the patient in front of me they are not the experts. The CDC published a list of contraindications to the vaccine that has been taken by health care institutions to be complete and definitive even though CDC never intended it to be comprehensive.
Senator Johnson: shouldn't health agencies be working for the doctors, providing them with information but not dictating to you?
Dr. Kheriarty: Yes, and that's a two-way street, they should be listening to doctors on the front line that see what's going on, that gain valuable clinical experience from things that were tested in highly controlled settings with smaller numbers of patients, and that can be disseminated more broadly. These agencies need that feedback and ultimately it has to be for the benefit of the patient. Financial and other perverse incentives and interests cannot play a role in these deliberations.
.
Dr. Marik: I can address this personally. What's happening now is completely unprecedented in the history of medicine and across the world. We have a federal government, state agencies and hospitals telling doctors how to practice medicine, interfering with the sacred patient-physician relationship. I can tell you what happened to me: I was using our protocol to treat critically ill patients in the ICU with a host of repurposed drugs. This was a memo (holds it up) sent to the entire health care system. This memo (Covid Comprehensive Treatment Guideline) says I can use Remdesivir, and it includes a "do not endorse" section with medications "that may cause harm and efficacy not supported in peer-reviewed published RCTs. These medications will not be verified or dispensed for the prevention or treatment of Covid." [The listed medications included IVM and ascorbic acid, among others]. Effectively preventing me from treating my patients according to my best clinical judgment. I objected. As a clinician for the first time in my entire career I could not be a doctor. I had 7 Covid patients, including a 31-year-old woman. I was not allowed to treat these people. I had to stand by idly watching these people die.
I then tried to sue the system and they did something called peer sham review, accusing me of 7 most outrageous crimes and that I was such a severe threat to the safety of patients they immediately suspended my hospital privileges. Ignoring the fact that under my care, the rate of mortality of my patients was 50% those of my colleagues. I then went through the sham peer review and the end result was that I lost my hospital privileges and was reported to the National Practitioner databank. So for standing up for patients' rights, this evil hospital ended my medical career.
.
In answer to a question from Dr. McCullough about his patients, Dr. Marik answered that they were all Covid patients. Dr. McCullough: this peer review constituted advising therapeutic nihilism, the denial of treatment to patients in need. Doctors are able to use safe, effective, off-label drugs for other conditions like pneumococcal pneumonia, this edict is strictly for Covid.
.
Senator Johnson: how has the hospital treatment advanced and improved over the past 2 years?
Dr. Marik: it's a terrible thing for me to say, I worked in ICUs for 35 years, but hospitals have become dangerous places for sick people. Patients must do whatever they can to avoid the hospital. Once they're in the hospital they're denied their rights, aren't allowed a patient advocate, their family denied access to the patient, they have no rights and they get the treatment dictated by the hospital.
.
Dr. Kheriarty: There have been two advances. One is some hospitals are finally using steroids, sometimes sufficiently dosed; in the beginning they wouldn't even do that even though it's clearly an inflammatory condition in the lung when it gets to that phase of the illness. The other advance is that intubated patients get turned over on their stomach. Another thing hospitalized patients and their families were denied was the basic human good of burying the dead; in the early days of the pandemic because of fears the dead patient could somehow still spread Covid despite all science, many health departments with support of the CDC refused to give the body back to the family for burial.
.
Dr. Urso, in response to Senator Johnson. saying we didn't know all of this early on: we did know it, we had early treatment in March - treatment for inflammation and blood clotting, there was even treatment we could try for the virus. Respiratory viruses are gone within 5-7 days so to say a corpse could spread it is fraud. One more thing - the FDA NIH and CDC are not involved in medical education. We went through a medical program, a residency, we've have colleagues, mentors, people that we rely on. I've treated 300k patients, I've never called the FDA, the NIH or the CDC a single time for advice, it's not who we call. So to have them dictate our medical practices has to stop. Our current system is the corporate practice of medicine.
.
Senator Johnson (about 3:49): is this completely a new phenomenon?
Dr. Urso: historically, I was very closely aligned to the hospitals, doctors and hospitals were like a partnership, and the insurers were the other side of things. But the hospitals started consolidating, building these big organizations and now they're the most powerful entity in medical care.
.
Dr. Kory: prior to Covid, I did see some of this starting to happen. I was a clinical leader in a major institution and medical academic center and started to hear these echoes of "standardize, standardize, standardize." The problem with that is a patient is not a car, hospitals are not factories. This push for standardization hyper-accelerated into some kind of totalitarian, top down control of the practice of medicine. The ability to make decisions based on your decades of expertise and experience was removed, you were told to use this drug at this dose at this duration. That is unprecedented.
If you want to talk about hospital medicine, how far we've advanced, my strongly held expert opinion as someone who's been treating Covid patients in hospitals for almost two years, is that the proximate cause of death of nearly everyone in the hospital is the severe, persistent and pervasive underdosing of cortical steroids. The standard NIH recommended guideline dose is Dexamethasone at 6 mg. a day. That's less than I give my 80-year-old patients with emphysema who are wheezing. These [underdosed] are patients on ventilators with almost no lung capacity left and we're giving them anemic and pathetic doses of steroids and they die. They keep coming into my ICU and I look at their record, what they were treated with at the hospital, and they're stuck on this anemic dose of steroids. Why would this happen? Why aren't doctors thinking and saying "they're getting sicker" and escalating doses? I don't know why. It's this totalitarianism.
.
I'm going to call out the corruption again. This dose that was tested in a major trial, which made cortical steroids a standard worldwide, was ridiculous, it was the lowest dose, and the dose being used helps the few and fails the many. We now have at least a dozen studies showing different cortical steroids than Dexamethasone and at higher dosages are more effective, yet the system just chugs on. I think it was deliberately tested at a lower dose, here's why: the corruption has been well described. They fix trials, they can design trials to fail, to disprove the use of cheap medicine and make it appear that things don't work. I think the dose was deliberately left low to leave room for novel, more expensive, patented cytokine blockers, so they could enforce the use of more expensive, profitable drugs.
.
Dr. McCullough: and the mortality rate in the 6 mg. dose trial was 22%. Unacceptably high. The idea that we're going to take 6 mg Dexamethasone and hold it out as the standard, with a 22% mortality rate from a single trial, is medical malfeasance. Any good doctor use the principles of the use of cortical steroids and find a more appropriate dose.
.
Dr. Kheriarty: It's very important on the why question to look at the way the CMS Medicare/Medicaid payment structures have created perverse incentives for the hospitals, with hospital administrators looking at those reimbursements. The way a Covid hospitalizations was paid more than someone with the exact same symptoms, etc. but not testing positive. So I'm treating a 22-year-old hospitalized patient for suicidal ideation and a positive Covid test but with zero Covid symptoms - she's in isolation, she shouldn't be on the medical floor, she should be in the psychiatric ward but the hospital is getting paid more for this Covid patient.
.
The same incentives apply with regard to the novel drugs like Remdesivir. Once a drug goes through approval and Medicare decides to pay for it, that becomes "standard of care" and third party payers and private insurance companies will follow suit. So Medicare really sets the table and sets the rules by which the hospitals operate financially and the other third-party payers follow suit.
.
Senator Johnson (about 3:58:30): To close out the hospital discussion, the history of the fear is real, I remember the Chinese responders in their moon suits, and the fear wasn't unreasonable because we didn't know. I've always put my faith in the doctors who actually treated patients. Many of these hero doctors and nurses have recovered from Covid, they're treating the vaccine injured, and there's no way these people are going to get the vaccine.
.
We're still pushing the mandates even though we know the vaccines don't stop infection or transmission, and we're doing a great deal of harm to our health care system, exacerbating the health care shortage. Introduces a nurse, Jennifer Bridges.
Jennifer Bridges: I'm still a nurse but I was fired from Houston Methodist. We were the first ones mandated for the Covid shot. We have a huge state and federal lawsuit because we don't want to be guinea pigs. We saw for ourselves people coming in with adverse reactions after getting the Pfizer shot. I worked with the Covid unit the entire time until they fired me in June. Houston Methodist started the first two months using HCQ, then they cut it back and started using Remdesivir and other expensive drugs. No one could give a reason, just "the hospital policy changed." Most of the doctors would not even go in the Covid rooms, maybe two that would. They would stand outside the room, make us dress up head to toe and go in with an iPad, so this is the only communication they had with the patient. They would never look at the patient, assess the lungs; and then they would go to discharge them - I would come back out and ask, "have you listened to them? They can't breathe, the wheezing is horrible." They had no clue.
.
I was the first one at Houston Methodist they asked to do window visits when Covid patients were dying. They never did this with any other patients that were dying, but families were not allowed to come in and say goodbye. The window visits - they would escort families into the cafeteria windows, I would go there, sweating my butt off for about 1.5 to 2 hours just to hold the phone to their loved ones ear so families could say goodbye. Other nurses didn't want to do it, they complained of the heat.
.
I didn't go to the media at first. Right before I got fired I had a meeting with my CEO and CNO at Houston Methodist; someone told them I was going around with a petition against our being mandated to take vaccine. In the meeting they threatened me, told me I had to stop, they could fire me over it because I was "soliciting". CEO told me that 100% compliance was more important than my individual autonomy as a nurse, which was a huge slap in the face.
.
After I got so public, doctors and other whistleblowers came to me to share information so I've seen text messages and emails where the hospital threatened their doctors, told them you can't sign medical exemptions. you can't talk about or report adverse reactions. And if someone was brave enough to put it on the record, there were others higher up who would erase it. I have the proof and the people who have shown me these things.
Senator Johnson: I can confirm everything you're telling me, I've heard the same countless times from other nurses. Our health care system suffers because you're not in it anymore. Hundreds of people like you are no longer in it because they were fired over the vaccine mandates.
.
In closing minutes I have to have Brie Dressen talk about why the vaccine-injured patients are in the same position as treating doctors, why it's so important for people to at least acknowledge just the possibility that your injury might have been caused by the vaccine.
.
Brianne Dressen: What we [vaccine-injured] have seen firsthand is woven into every one of your (the doctors') experiences. You have these agencies that have politicized the medical system, violated the patient to physician trust, and left us out on a lurch because we have nothing. As an example, I've been fighting with Janet Woodcock at the FDA for 7-8 months; I'm not a physician, I'm a preschool teacher but I have Ivy league physicians referring vaccine-injured patients to me for medical care. If that doesn't tell Janet Woodcock that the system is broken I don't know what will.
.
To the doctors we seek treatment from, we don't exist. Over 80% of us are misdiagnosed with anxiety initially then months down the road we get an appropriate diagnoses. And it's then we can find doctors willing to go against the directives; as we've heard, doctors' licenses are being threatened and because of that we cannot get medical care, they're afraid to treat us. We've had severely injured patients who are dying who can't even get in the door to be seen by a physician because they're afraid of the words "Covid vaccine."
Instead they've made people like me and Kyle and our membership of 12k vaccine-injured, we're at ground zero for providing care for vaccine injured when we have highly qualified practitioners across the globe that have been silenced and threatened if they even see us for what's going on.
.
Senator Johnson: we also need to point out what happened with your Facebook group within 24 hours of your first appearance at my earlier hearing, their Facebook support groups that allow them to stay in contact with people who are suicidal.
.
Brianne Dressen: they pulled us apart. We are having to continually reboot and regroup and hope everyone can find us again. These people do not have appropriate medical resources because those doors have been closed to them. The FDA et al. know that this is happening, and it would be very simple for them to issue a message through the American Medical Association that doctors will not have their licenses pulled for addressing and acknowledging a vaccine injury.
Senator Johnson (about 4:10): I haven't even scratched my list but we need to understand what is causing these injuries. [Asked Dr. McCullough to talk about myocarditis]
Dr. McCullough: all these vaccines use genetic technologies that harness the body's own cells to produce the protein on the surface of the virus, the spike protein, which is acknowledged to be dangerous. This is the first time in human medicine that we have an uncontrolled exposure for an uncontrolled duration and quantity in the human body in a mosaic of cells. And to make matters worse, the vehicle that carries these genetic products into the body goes into vital organs. It's unprecedented that we have ever exposed a single human, let alone hundreds of millions of people to this form of technology. I published an oped before they were released saying the vaccines were a gamble because they had a biologically dangerous mechanism of action. And we've seen a large signal on safety. Unprecedented numbers of deaths and non-fatal injuries after exposure. See it here, see it in the UK's system, in the EU's system - we've just fulfilled the Bradford Hill tenets of causality. Meaning - I'm telling you as an epidemiologist - the vaccines are causing these fatal and non-fatal events.
.
Senator Johnson (about 4:12:30): I was contacted over the weekend by attorney Tom Renz, who represents some whistleblowers in the DOD. He showed me the data that is being extracted from the DMED database - Defense medical database. Going to summarize because we're running out of time -these whistleblowers have been extracting data out of the DMED database, they've noticed alarming increases in certain conditions compared to 5-year data, in some cases a 10X increase. They also have evidence that with myocarditis the data has been doctored already - did a search engine query in August, saw a certain level of myocarditis, something like 28X higher, but now in January it's only 2X higher. So there appears to be doctoring of the data. Now my staff has already sent this morning a record preservation letter to the DOD. Asked Tom to quickly review.
Tom Renz (about 4:14:20): we have 3 whistleblowers who've given me permission to share their names - Lt Col Dr. Theresa Long, DOMPH; Dr. Samuel Sigoloff; and Lt. Col. Dr. Peter Chambers, DOM Flight Surgeon; and I have declarations from all of them signed under penalty of perjury. We intend to submit this to the courts.
.
Miscarriages increased by almost 300% over the 5-year average. Almost 300% increase in cancer. Neurological issues which would affect our pilots - over 1000% increase. 82k per year to 863k per year in one year. Our soldiers are being experimented on, injured and sometimes possibly killed. Thanked Dr. Kory for his stance on the corruption, that's precisely what it is.
.
When these doctors are attacked - not necessarily the ones in this room - they call me. I'm the one dealing with the medical boards, watching the witch hunts and fighting them off and telling them where to go and I'm going to keep doing that.
Last thing - 9/28/2021, Project Salas weekly report. Project Salas is a Defense Dept. initiative where they take all this data that supposedly doesn't exist and they give it to the CDC. They're watching these vaccines. On and around that date, I have numerous instances where Fauci et al. were saying it was a crisis of the unvaxxed; in Project Salas, the weekly DOD report says specifically 71% of new cases are in the fully vaxxed and 60% of hospitalizations are in the fully vaxxed. This is corruption at highest level, we need investigations of the CDC and the Secretary of Defense.
.
Senator Johnson: the DOD, the Biden administration is on notice - they must preserve these records and this must be investigated. The increase in cancer is something I've been hearing about for months. (Asked Dr. Cole to talk about this)
Dr. Cole: it's a challenge of aggregating data. I saw a signal early on for an increase in certain viruses as Dr. Parks mentioned. These same T-cells keep cancers in check. I do about 40k biopsies a year and noticed I was seeing more of different types of cancer. Tried to talk to other labs and aggregate a bigger dataset - obviously these federal datasets are a very easy way to see that signal. I've been canceled and ridiculed and maligned for saying it, but I've been observing it and I can't deny observation; that's how science works - initially through observation, then we confirm through hypothesis, experiment and data.
.
Now as we travel with these summits, I have radiation oncologists telling me they're seeing an uptick in cancers; seeing odd, stable cancers take off like wildfires after the vaccines. We need funds to investigate it. NIH isn't looking at it, getting a grant to study anything related to the vaccines is next to impossible because they're "perfect, safe and effective." My data is anecdotal, we need studies to test hypotheses.
.
Senator Johnson: observation is where I got the safety signal, nurses contacting me about mandates saying they didn't want to get the vaccine because they were seeing these cancers that had been in remission blossoming again.
Dr. Urso: question for Dr. Cole. You know the experimental data on the genome and the P53, can you explain that to everyone?
.
Dr. Cole: we have genes in our body, mechanisms in our body, we have bad cells in our body every day but our body can kill them. There are suppressor genes, P53, it's the guardian of our genome. There's another breast cancer gene, BRCA gene, and we know the spike protein binds to the receptors for this gene and can activate them. So putting the spike protein in the human body via a gene shot that's completely investigational and then to mandate them.
Dr. Parks: what P53 does is check your DNA before it replicates and it makes sure it's fixed. So the P53 is the one tumor suppressor gene that's most tied to cancer because once there's a mutation in P53, the mutations just skyrocket and increase the likelihood the cancer will become metastatic.
Dr. Urso: there's a paper by Jiang and Mei that confirms the spike impairs DNA damage repair.
.
Dr. Wiseman: a central issue is we still don't know the essential structure of these vaccines. We do have some info now that's been published by a Nobel Laureate group from Stanford, looking at the sequence from discards and comparing them to the patents, and there are what's called "untranslated regions." Everyone has been told that the RNA in the vaccines is just RNA, it's making the spike protein - these "untranslated regions" are: there are 3 human gene sequences, one of them we think (I'm working with a group of molecular biologists in genomics) is targeting mitochondria, i.e., that the expression of the spike protein is actually being expressed in ribosomal, mitochondrial ribosomes.
Senator Johnson pointed out he doesn't know what all this means.
Dr. Wiseman: in every single drug package insert, you see a chemical structure, do you not? It means the FDA needs to tell us the exact chemical structure, the sequence of those RNA and DNA structures, they need to explain what the pseudouridine is doing; a 2014 paper from the founder of BioNTech talks about non-natural nucleosides. What are these doing? He talks about the toxicity of them, the pseudouridine. None of this is being discussed.
.
Dr. Parks: I want to clarify [this is extremely complicated and detailed so I don't know how accurately I've captured her remarks]. RNA can make little hairpin loops, it can regulate your DNA. It can be alternately spliced, it can bind to your DNA and it can regulate it, for positive or negative. It can change your gene expression intentionally or unintentionally. It's completely unethical to use this technology.
.
Dr. McCullough: there are great unknowns with respect to the vaccines, their mechanism of action and disease categories like cancer. But there is a disease category upon which the FDA, CDC and stakeholders all agree the vaccine causes, myocarditis or heart inflammation.
.
I will tell you, as a cardiologist, that it's crystal clear the vaccine causes myocarditis. There's all kinds of data showing this, we now have more than 200 papers. More reports of fatalities from myocarditis accruing - 1 death is too many. We have 21k cases of myocarditis and climbing that the CDC has verified. Under no circumstances should a young person ever receive one of these vaccines, let alone be pressured or mandated to take it.
.
Myocarditis is not mild. Studies - when they do MRI on people suspected as having myocarditis, 100% of them are having heart damage. 13% will have permanent heart injury, 32% never actually get up to normal. We're seeing unprecedented numbers of athletes dying on the field in Europe. With these cardiac arrests, 1/2 of them don't come back. We have a report out of the heart group in the UK where actuarial mortality for those under 15 years old is higher than expected.
Senator Johnson: concern about myocraditis and the DMED whistleblower report is that this is the only vaccine injury that the CDC and FDA are acknowledging; so combined with suspicions that the DOD is doctoring the data -
.
Lee [Dennis?], human rights attorney working with Tom Renz on the whistleblower info: not just a suspicion. In August when the [DMED] report was run there were 1,239 cases of myocarditis and now when you run it, it's down to 307. In Jan 2022 there were 176 cases, now magically down to 17. We have in the military the single best dataset that exists because we have baselines in there, and acute disease across all categories over the preceding 5 years leading up to the vaccination year was 1.7 million. They mandated the vaccine for service members after only 12 people had died of Covid and in the 10 months after, it jumped from 1.7 million all diseases to almost 22 million, and increase of 20 million. I would ask Congress to put these whistleblowers on record
.
Senator Johnson: we will take their testimony, and as said previously, DOD is on notice to preserve these records. (he held up a document that's almost completely redacted) This is what we get when I investigate (this was from prior investigations). This is how federal agencies comply with Congressional oversight.
.
Tom Renz: we're glad to share with you, Senator, we have quite a number of those that are not blanked out. Also, the one side effect they're acknowledging is a complete lie. I've got the Pfizer documents; Pfizer said in their FOIA docs they released, these are the side effects we're looking for. We've got FDA's documents showing what they're looking for. They're not sharing it with the American people because they're covering it up. Corruption is the word of the day and I think it needs to be reiterated.
.
Senator Johnson: asked Dr. Kheriarty to talk specifically about what the drug company was supposed to turn over.
Dr. Kheriarty: on the day Pfizer authorized under EUA, according to federal regulatory law the clinical trials data had to be made public to the American people. The clinical trials data that Pfizer submitted to the FDA to review in deciding whether to grant approval.
Senator Johnson: Why wasn't it? Was there a waiver granted?
Dr. Kheriarty: No. They didn't deny that they had to release it eventually, just said they had a lot of FOIA requests and only have (with a budget of $6 bn.) a handful of employees to handle these requests, etc.
.
Senator Johnson: Now a federal judge has ordered the release over 8 months. We're running out of time but wanted to talk about some of the other revelations. The FOIA for Japanese regulators showed that this vaccine isn't staying in the muscle... lipid nanoparticles...and it also goes through some of these difficult permeable barriers, e.g., the brain.
Continued in Part IV
there doesn't seem to be anything here