In a 2-1/2 hour chat with The Duran, Robert talked frankly about the two Covid-related federal lawsuits he's involved with (starting about 2:14:25).
This followed a broader, more detailed discussion on a number of ongoing Justice Dept. actions, e.g., Assange, Trump, Project Veritas that I summarized in a separate post.
Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson vs. Pfizer
We filed in the last couple of weeks, there will be big hearings in the fall on two big vaccine cases. One is by the big vaccine whistleblower Brook Jackson and this has global ramifications. It involves a specific statute called the False Claims Act.
She brought her claim, saying how she witnessed the clinical 3 trial phase of Pfizer's vaccine in TX. She's been involved in this industry for many years and it was so bad - over 200 paragraphs of detailed facts, 1000s of pages, documents and photos, it would take us weeks just to go through them all. Just to give you a snapshot, if you walked into this clinical 3 testing to make sure the vax is safe and effective and an actual vaccine:
She found trash bags with needles sticking out - one of the most basic safety measures in the medical industry is properly disposing of needles and they weren't even doing that.
She saw people's private medical information plastered on the wall for anyone to see, a violation of HIPAA.
They were unblinding people so people knew who was getting the vax and who the placebo, totally gutting a critical method for ascertaining safety and efficacy of any drug.
They weren't monitoring adverse effects effectively at all. The whole clinical trial was a rushed joke. There were under the table payments going on, people getting benefits in a wide range of
ways.
She's shocked, she reports it, legally Pfizer is supposed to shut it down until all the problems are fixed, etc. They did nothing, so she kept going up the food chain. ultimately to the FDA itself and is fired by Pfizer as soon as they find out.
She brings the suit, the DOJ sits on it, never takes meaningful action, takes a hands-off approach - the Biden administration isn't going to touch this so we're obligated to litigate it ourselves.
Pfizer moved to have the case dismissed on the grounds that they contracted with the various governments out of their responsibility and accountability - so they contracted with these governments in a way that meant they could never be sued, even in the US where they stole billions of dollars from the American treasury.
Pfizer's defense is that it's okay they committed fraud (which goes well beyond the clinical trials) because they have "special contractual immunity", that they can't be sued in court because they agreed to secret arbitration proceedings with the government.
All of this shows their culpability going in. They had every reason to know it wouldn't be safe or effective or a vaccine but they were desperate for the money so they cut deals with the government to make it impossible for them to be sued.
The judge said he was going to rule on the law, the facts and the merits so we'll see what he does; we win on those and should get to discovery. My experience with federal courts in general is that they don't always follow through on those promises when it involves institutional power and has global ramifications, because globally this is a trillion dollar scandal when you connect it all up, all the drug companies and entities and activities.
Children's Health Defense vs FDA
The other suit I brought with RFK Jr. on behalf of Children's Health Defense against the FDA concerns them trying to force these vaccines on little kids as young as 6 mo. old.
FDA's argument is they're above the law as long as we use the magical words "emergency powers" no one can sue us, even if we're violating the limits Congress placed on those emergency powers. Even if we violate the Administrative Procedures Act that
governs the democratic, participatory aspect of American government, allowing notice and comment, review of citizens' petitions and rights to answers. They're saying they don't have to abide by any of that, if they say it's an emergency, end of story.
We're saying 1) they don't have that authority; 2) what they did wasn't emergency power because no emergency existed; 3) changing the definition of vaccines and lying to the public about the safety and efficacy and the nature of this drug not even being a
vaccine is not an emergency power given to them either by the Constitutution or Congress.
We have a very smart judge in this case but the courts have a long history in America of capitulating to the government, of not standing up to government corruption or institutional corporate corruption.
So our federal judiciary is being tested - can it step up to its Constitutional role and protect the law, protect liberty and protect ordinary people.
Alexander: I think it's going to be bigger than the tobacco
litigation in terms of its financial impact. It's obvious that the pharmaceutical companies have gone hideously wrong; this isn't just proved by all the facts you described, it's proved by their defense.
What is that defense other than an argument that you contracted out of the law, and how can you do that? It can't be done. A government cannot just sign the law away, it's not within their power. Government is itself a creature of law, it's there to administer law not to override it. Especially when it comes to criminal law and fraud - saying "you're immune from any of the criminal acts you've committed."
The fact they're relying on this defense, that they sought this kind of agreement with the government, demonstrates extreme bad faith if nothing else
Robert: what all these cases have in common is that it's all about secrets. they prove Assange's fundamental premise - how bad people in government get away with doing bad things on a massive scale depends entirely on secrecy. His idea was if you strip secrecy from the State, you would take away its capacity to do
large scale evil on a continual basis. His broader thesis was, if we're going to defeat the corruption of states, we must expose their secrets.
They show the power of secrets to corrupt our society and governance and taking them on is a critical role for anyone who cares about liberty and freedom and individual human rights.
there doesn't seem to be anything here