all 10 comments

[–]unagisongsBurn down Reddit! 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's almost as if we built a system that rewards and embraces sociopathic greed. /s

[–]risistill me 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If saving American lives were a priority of the US government, many things would be very different, from single payer to SNAP to wars.

[–]CrazyjanecreepyjeffReality Monger 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If we had single payer how would they coerce us to stay at shitty jobs?

[–]RandomCollection 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I've long believed that the rich are some of the worst monsters in the US.

They'll happily destroy all the lives of those who can't afford healthcare for a dollar of profit.

[–]risistill me 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Aided and abetted by legislators and chief executives, federal and state.

[–]unagisongsBurn down Reddit! 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Paid to lose top to bottom.

[–]FThumbStay thirsty, my friends 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In addition, the country would have saved $105 billion in COVID-19 hospitalization expenses alone.

That 'savings' is someone else's profits. And those profits buy a lot of political cover. Which is why we never see the savings.

[–]kingsmegLiberté, égalité, fraternité 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

That assumes the US government is interested in either of those outcomes.

[–]FThumbStay thirsty, my friends 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Or 'saving' the public any money.

[–]therazorx👹🧹🥇 The road to truth is often messy. 👹📜🕵️🎖️[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Excerpt:

In the United States, death rates from COVID-19 are higher than in any other high-income country—and our fragmented and inefficient health system may be largely to blame, Yale researchers say in a new study.

If the U.S. had had a single-payer universal health care system in 2020, nearly 212,000 American lives would have been saved that year, according to a new study. In addition, the country would have saved $105 billion in COVID-19 hospitalization expenses alone.

The research team further calculated that in a non-pandemic year, some $438 billion would be saved by single-payer universal health care, like Medicare for All.

[snip]

The researchers compared people with and without health insurance, examining death rates from COVID-19 and overall. Building on earlier research, they calculated that 131,438 COVID deaths in 2020 could have been avoided with universal single-payer health care.

Overall, including both COVID and non-COVID patients, 211,897 lives would have been saved in 2020 with universal care. From the start of the pandemic in the U.S. to March 2022, those preventable deaths mount to 338,594.

Far from financially burdening the nation, universal single-payer health care would not only have saved lives, it would have also avoided hundreds of billions of dollars in costs. Medicare for All would reduce costs by improving access to preventive care, reducing administrative overhead, and empowering Medicare to negotiate prices, the researchers said. Single-payer health care would also eliminate pricy insurance premiums and reduce fraud.

“A single-payer health care system would be much more economically efficient than our current fragmented structure and would save over $450 billion per year,” Galvani said.