“Q Anon” May Have Been an FBI Psyop - Global Research

submitted by zyxzevn from globalresearch.ca

all 24 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]discountmeat 8 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 5 fun -  (5 children)

This became obvious when q was asking us to praise Trump and trust him with marshall law.

[–]Node 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I'm not into cartoons, but I wouldn't want to see Trump in charge of Marshall Law. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall_Law_(Tekken)

[–]Vagina7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

trump is probably the only person that i would trust as my dictator.

the swamp hates him, because he opposes them.

[–]Node 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

the swamp hates him, because he opposes them.

I liked Trumps style, until he revealed himself to be a lying shit the day after the 2016 election. "You'd be in jail" transformed into "Hillary is a good person and my close friend, and no one is getting arrested" once he scammed us out of our vote.

Then I began to look more objectively, and it's not pretty. Trump kept the swamp flooded more deeply than anytime in the history of our country. Tremendous flooding! No one has ever flooded the swamp as successfully as Trump!

Look at his actions and the results, not his admittedly entertaining rhetoric.

All the 'hate' he received translated directly into the poor Qtards ignoring all his attacks on them, because "See? They hate him. That means he's on our side! Those attacks on us are just 5D chess!" That Q psyop was a pretty great trick by the cabal/globalists, or whatever they really are.

[–]Vigte 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Yes, it's obvious because "trust the plan" means no need to protest, or stand up - or say anything, magical internet fwend Q will save us all. And of course, if they do actually do or say anything - they get arrested - not because of Q but because some people are easily fooled into doing dumb stuff by others. Then the media throws the letter Q around as an excuse to blanket demonize all "conspiracy".

10 years ago every conspiracy researcher could tell you both parties are corrupt trash. Cue the qult and trump and suddenly it's just "us vs them" again. What a joke.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Cue the qult

Quality

[–]jykylsin2034 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Hot fucking take lmao

[–]SilenceThem_Consume 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

lmao

lmao.

[–]madcow-5 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Wouldn't doubt it.

I'd hear of it some on forums, but mostly people referencing it as ridiculous. I personally don't know anyone who followed it, and none of the many conservative youtubers I listen to seemed to have followed it. I also didn't hear much of it in the last year or two. It seemed like it died out, then the media suddenly wouldn't shut up about it starting a couple of months ago. At this point, it seems like a made up thing to label heretics.

[–]Node 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't know anyone in real life who followed "Q", but exchanged comments with thousands of the online Qtards. Okay, maybe it was just high hundreds, but what a 'phenomenal' group of people. Whew.

A couple of them were legitimately intelligent. Many were 'gibbering-at-the-moon' insane. Lots in the middle who were too dumb or desperate to look at it objectively. And I'm pretty positive there were quite a few tard wranglers there to keep them in the cult.

Even now, the diehards are projecting Trumps return sometime in March or April due to something or other.

If you're interested in a headache, look for Q posts by a user going by serialbrain2. Some kind of severe autism with jewish kabbalah number bullshit. ("take the exact second my comment was posted, divide that by the number of a Q post, then divide by the number of Trumps tweets on some day...) Anyway, the result then proves some Q thing is true. You'd have to read one of those to believe anyone is that out there.

[–]SilenceThem_Consume 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

then the media suddenly wouldn't shut up about it starting a couple of months ago.

And in 2019 there was suddenly a LOT more coverage of the 500 or-so anti vaxxers.

[–]zyxzevn[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Related:
Welcome To Cass Sunstein's Dream!!! The Fairy Tales Unicorns And Leprechauns AMA Jason Bermas
Goes a bit into "cognitive infiltration", a technique to undermine ideas that go against the narrative.

[–]solarsavior 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

When the media pummels something non-stop, you might want to ask the question why. Honestly, are you really interested in Q? Does it really get your attention? What does the MSM hope to achieve if it’s not a story their readers aren’t interested in. Or, is this propaganda against something that the know to be real and they’re doing everything they can to bury it.

The is no Q Anon. There is Q and there is Anons. There is no Q Anon, QAnon, or whatever. This is a made up term used for propaganda purposes.

Q is a military operation. It always has been. Trump not in the White House doesn’t necessarily matter. The wheels are in motion.

If you’d like to know more, hang out on greatawakening.win. We’re being pounded by shills right now, but if you can see past that you might learn something.

[–]369 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So, anons commonly call a random person that comes on the website and stands out, but somehow manages to deliver something of substance to the group, XXXXanon. This same formula applies to plenty of historical "drops" on /pol/. We have FBIanon, which some of you may be familiar with, we have BDanon, who seemed well-informed, but didn't appear to possess any super top secret knowledge or anything, or maybe meganon, a "lady" who talked about Dotcom and his hijinks.
Back when the first supposed "Q drops" appeared on /pol/ that fateful night, they didn't ever sign any of their posts with "Q" at the end. They did mention some very specific information though, which appears to have not played out the way they claimed. Not too long after that, "Q" seemed to have either made their first posts or began to use an alias, dubbing themselves, "Q Clearance Patriot". Not too long in to this, posts began being signed with "Q" at the end.
This is about when we started calling them either "Q Clearance Patriot", "Qanon" or "Q". Not too long after that, qanon.pub popped up, along with sites like qmap.pub and qresear.ch. Graphics were made about "Qanon", silver rounds were minted and called "Qanon silver roudns". Memes were made mentioning Q, blogs, subreddits and all sorts of shit were made where we talked about Q.

Anons dubbed each other XXXXfag or XXXXanon for a long time. This is not a new trend. We called Q by a few different names the whole time.
Some of the newfags though, the ones you were taught to call "paytriots", called US "Qanons" throughout the whole thing. Sure, I bitched at them several times in the beginning, saying, "nah, we're just anons newfag. Qanon is the big guy(s) we're suspending one of our rules for".
"What rule?", you ask. Well, that's simple. See, we call people that like to appeal to vanity and think they can be called anything besides "anon" around us "namefags". This is to shame people for appealing to vanity instead of... well, not doing that. It helps to keep the place tidy and info flowing through at adequate quality.
Anyway, I still feel very confident that Q was not pointing at everyone, but the "paytriots", the ones that were calling us something other than "anonymous/anon".
Besides, no one gets to decide their name. Even Q is not disqualified.

Why do you think there was so much infighting over the image used for the bread, fren? They used this shit to slide for literal months.
Shills used the drop to get anons all fixated on something completely irrelevant. The best slides are ones that the target never realizes they're on.

Good luck out there.

[–]RelianceTrust 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

No fuckin shit hrrmmmmmm.

Maybe y'all might try some gardening instead? https://youtu.be/f_6WRJiTtzE

[–]solder0 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Gee, I had no clue at all. How could I have possibly missed this?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

Perhaps Russian hackers, but definitely not the FBI. If it were PsyOp, CIA would be the place to look. But it's NOT FBI or CIA.

Consider the sources:

globalresearch.ca is run by this asshole:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_Chossudovsky

He basis his argument on these assholes:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiss_Policy_Research

[–]reddugee 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Of course, Wikipedia smears The Swiss Policy Research for exposing propaganda at Wikipedia:

Wikipedia: A Disinformation Operation? - OffGuardian https://swprs.org/the-american-empire-and-its-media/ https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Swiss_Propaganda_Research

[–]adultmanhwa 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

thanks for wikispooks.com link, I never know that existed lol. is there any other link - I mean alternative to wikipedia

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Isn't it the other way around? (Isn't swprs.org trying to show - rightly so - the corporate connections with Wikipedia. They also produced an article specifically on Wikipedia you did not link. I have no problem with this. There are problems with Corporate abuses of WIkipedia. It can still be usedul.)

The problem remains that swprs.org is particularly focused on propaganda, misinformation and disinformation? Some of their "research" might be helpful, but in general the site is pushing a conspiracy agenda favored by right-wing disinformation campaigns.

[–]reddugee 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The “sources” of so much of what clutters the page of saiddit, ruqqus etc. only serves to lock-in confirmation bias to one “our” side. The Left vs Right polarization serves to distract from the real battle which is Up vs Down. I don’t disagree that Wikipedia is useful for facts that are not in dispute but it’s this utility that it makes it an excellent delivery mechanism to shape public opinion.

I fail to see that SPRS are “assholes” - having been fact-checked by independent watchgroups with "no factual errors" and no obvious bias. People may not like what they say, but are largely neutral. By branding SPR as “promoting unproven conspiracy theories” it’s another example of attempting to discredit the source of inconvenient facts. SPR reveals the food chain of US corporate media and the Council Foreign Relations at the top pulling the strings. The CEO of Wikimedia Council is a high profile member of the CFR. https://swprs.org/the-american-empire-and-its-media/

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Chossudovsky's book on 9/11 made me realize he is a disinformation agent.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This whole thing is just more of left wing trash. The left often uses the CIA to look like the opposite to trash them so people will flock right on back to their party if they ever left in disgust. This 'Q Anon' reeks of controlled opposition by the CCP or another power grab.

[–]369 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Are you kidding? The FBI hates /ourguys/.

The vast majority of federal agents are good people. Unfortunately, too many of them are bound by fear or bureaucracy.
There's a reason that this is essentially the one country in the world where corporate oligarchs have more power than the people. This is why @Jack adores NAMBALA and shouts down people that dare to demand he removes child pornography from his website.