you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

That will be true. The pesticides recommended by the WHO will be the ones used. And there will be fucktons of instances.

[–]BISH 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

That will be true.

Mkay

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Moreover Recife didn't use it, and they had the most cases of microcephaly.

So that blows your theory out of the water anyway, even if you're going to claim that of the 4 million cities in the world only a few around Bahia used Pyriproxyfen.

[–]BISH 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I don't see any sources of evidence to support your argument.

I'm bored of your foolishness. Bye.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I don't see any sources of evidence to support your argument.

Above in this thread.

The city with the most microcephaly was Recife, where they didn't use pyriproxyfen but instead used bti, a bacteria.

I'm bored of your foolishness. Bye.

No, you're embarrassed by being wrong. And instead of changing your position to match the evidence, you're ignoring the evidence. The inability to look at contrary evidence is common in conspiracy theorists.

Bye.

See ya.

[–]BISH 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

You're using the criminals to solve the crime.

Shills gonna shill.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

The simple fact is that Recife had that largest share of cases of microcephaly and did not use pyriproxyfen.

It doesn't matter who's trying to solve the crime. It's pyriproxyfen clearly didn't cause the plurality of microcephaly cases, because there wasn't any fucking exposure to pyriproxyfen.

This isn't rocket science.

[–]BISH 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Thanks, shill.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No problem, sucker.

Any future time I notice you're badly misinformed about something, I'll try to help.

[–]BISH 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You're here to misinform.

It's too easy to see through your nonsense.