It's been a long road these last three years.

Three years ago, I would never have entertained the idea that C19 could have been released intentionally. Now I must entertain that idea. I won't say it's a fact, but I also will not reject the possibility.

My reasoning is based on the flagrant gaslighting in response to obvious harm and death as a result of the jabs. For those of us paying attention with just a little skepticism in mid-2021, the VAERS data could not have been clearer. Now we see that CDC is forced to release their own analysis confirming that the carnage associated with these shots is absolutely real and statistically unassailable. Adverse events in all vaccines prior to 2019 put together are swamped by the damage done in the past two years.

CDC, FDA, WHO, NIH, etc reject the idea of even examining this possibility. This can no longer be viewed as a mistake. This is policy. 100% intentional. To examine - even in any cursory way - the safety of these shots is verboten. The only official priority is to give as many shots as they can get people to take. Nothing else matters. Conclusion? Given that society cannot ignore that the shots have zero efficacy against the "virus" within a period of weeks, the only lasting effect these shots have is the damage to the recipients' health - including death. The people pulling these strings must want this damage.

We also know that Fauci went well out of his way to make sure the "virus" was created in the first place. He was officially told to stop, so he outsourced to China. The most important "gain" in the function of the "virus" - though they created a hodgepodge of mechanisms of damage as well - was to make it infect humans preferentially. So Fauci and his lieutenants put significant time and energy into creating a bug designed to infect humans.

One more note. The "vaccines" designed to "solve" the problem use the human cell factory to manufacture a very specific part of the "virus", the spike protein. There was research before 2019 demonstrating spike proteins in these coronavirus strains are toxic. This was published in peer-reviewed literature. In other words, the specific design of the shots is to create an element of the "virus" that was already demonstrated to be toxic to the recipient of the shots. This was known before 2019. Virologists knew this.

With all the above, the fact that the shots are killing people is not in the least surprising, and those who continue to push these shots know all of this, and they knew it before they rolled these shots out.

In summary, a group of people high up in the medical power structure spends years in the project of altering a coronavirus to infect humans preferentially and possess lots of nasty - often lethal - side effects. Those same people then proceed to put on their "hero" hats and to create a shot that specifically prompts the human body itself to manufacture the most nasty element of the "virus" they created, the element already known to cause significant damage to recipients of that shot.

They had it at both ends. Given that the nasty effects of the shot are precisely the same nasty effects (only more concentrated) of the "virus" they claim to have designed the shot to protect from, does it not make sense they intended both events?

Hypothesis: C19 is a bioweapon. It was intentionally released, with a hoped-for effect of population reduction globally. Because the mechanism of spread through natural contact would be hindered by the natural biology of human immunity (the un-fucked-with human immune system is very good at fighting strange new bugs, like incredibly good at it), however, they needed a more secure back-up plan. They needed to get people to directly inject the most toxic portion of the "virus" past the natural defensive barrier of the human body.

This project is still on-going.

As I said, three years ago, I would have thought this beyond absurd. But the lies they have told are so blatant that with every lie it becomes less and less tenable to believe they don't know what they are doing. There can be no benign reason they are working so very hard to prevent every effort to actually treat the "virus", while simultaneously denying the undeniable harms (like people dying within minutes of receiving them) associated with the shots. This can no longer be considered a mistake. Mistakes are random. This is clearly policy, i.e. intentional.