"The FBI and CIA have covered up the fact that Ukraine committed an act of war against the US on J6 2021" #boom

submitted by xolotltlalo from twitter.com

all 9 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]xolotltlalo[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Loomer dropping BOOOMBS today

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

The video proves that on that date, the person in the video likely had the police file which we heard being read out in the video.

That's all it proves.

Dear OP: Sorry maybe you're new to this. You seem to have misunderstood - this is not a story that is going to hang around.

You're going to want to drop this one, and the people who you follow on twitter surely will also. Even Laura Loomer is going to drop this story extremely soon.

Here are some reasons why your whole political aisle are going to soon pretend this story never happened

  1. It seems to reveal that the FBI were treating Azov or similar groups as potential terrorist entities

  2. It seems to reveal that the FBI were monitoring Americans who had ties to these Ukrainian groups

  3. Dude this is how I know you're new to this. Jan 6th absolutely ought not be called "an act of war". You should have said it was ordinary hoedown patriots and a small group of antifa provocateurs.

  4. The story wouldn't be about Ukraine doing an act of war; if this story is true, it looks to be an American trumpist right-winger who went to train with right-wing Ukraine groups. That's what the story appears to be about

You don't want to be the last one of Loomer's twitter followers to still be pretending this was a real story she broke.

I suggest you get ahead of the curve and disclaim this bullshit now before you look even more stupid

[–]yellowsnow2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Those whom want the truth will consider new evidence as it is exposed. The truth always comes out eventually and can not be kept secret for long. Your attack on the messenger and not the facts of the message, and your assertion that we must stick to the original perspective that corporate media told us to believe, makes it sound as if you are working as a mind guard for group think mind control.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The link which we're commenting under, is a video, of a cop reading out some things from a screen, relating to Ukraine and the FBI.

If I wanted to prove to you that the cop had said those things, or I wanted to prove to you that some text had been on the screen at the time of the recording - this video would be proof of those things. If I was like "bruh yellowsnow2 I promise you, a police officer was asking questions about Ukraine" and you were like "nuh uh he didn't"....then I could use this video to prove my case.

That's all it proves, in isolation.

If you think there's a greater case to be built, then build it. But so far, that video is what I've seen.

It's really revealing that you consider my post to be an "attack on the messenger"

It reveals that you are committed to this out of spiritual belief and not on an intellectual level.

You are reacting as if I slighted your prophet. Instead, I gathered the facts and relayed them to you. If the facts are not to your liking, then that's a problem with you, not with reality itself. So don't be a snowflake, yellowsnow, if you think this is part of a greater case then build your case...

[–]yellowsnow2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

So you you don't even understand what this post is about but claim it is false and throw in some TDS comments for good measure.

So don't be a snowflake, yellowsnow, if you think this is part of a greater case then build your case...

My post was posted before this one and goes into great detail. Educate your self and stop supporting Nazis

https://saidit.net/s/conspiracy/comments/bfkz/it_seems_laura_loomer_has_uncovered_the_ciafbi/

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yeah and I commented there too, because your evidence was trash-level

I honestly cannot believe you allow yourself to believe this crap, on such trash-level evidence

[–]yellowsnow2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Some of us know criminals do not leave evidence on purpose so you must use logic and reason on what little you can to understand the underlying conspiracy. Keep pushing the corporate CIA narrative you fascist.

[–]xolotltlalo[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The video proves that on that date, the person in the video likely had the police file which we heard being read out in the video.

Huh?

Sorry maybe you're new to this.

Fuck you too.

this is not a story that is going to hang around.

hahaha... yea no shit. only bullshit lies about how awesome the deep state players are, get traction.

I suggest you get ahead of the curve and disclaim this bullshit now before you look even more stupid

suck a dick

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well, it has been a week now since you discovered this "act of war" hashtag boom, so let's check.

Does anyone in your twitter feed still talk about this

Do any of the alt media channels you follow still talk about this

Are any of your podcasters or truth social users still talking about this

Because so far, after 1 week, it seems like I was totally correct in my prediction.

So given that, in this thread so far, I have exhibited a 100% correct prediction rate, perhaps you should look at the facts which informed my prediction (namely that you seem to be new to this, you didn't realise that this was a non-story, you missed the facts which I used to inform my 100% correct prediction)

Huh?

The "proof" which you cited for the "act of war" hashtag boom is a video.

In the video we hear a cop reading out some details from a police file.

The only thing which this video proves, is that on that date, the person in the video likely had the police file which we heard being read out in the video.

Your video doesn't prove or even evidence an act of war. So both you and the dipshit OP tweeter are incorrectly citing this as evidence for something which is not in the video