One of these is the Black Hole image released yesterday. The other three are cardiac PET scan images.

submitted by Jesus from pbs.twimg.com

all 13 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]FormosaOolong 6 insightful - 8 fun6 insightful - 7 fun7 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

It just proves there's a black hole where our hearts should be ;D

[–]hennaojisan 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

Look, these are the people who put men on the moon. How can you question their veracity? :)

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

No they didn't, nobody has gone to the moon. I'd watch this, the best documentary to date on the moon landing, a documentary that, in my opinion debunks NASA's lies for good. The entire story was a ruse to get public support for covert weaponization of space. Buy it, watch and then you'll see, that something is terribly wrong with the offical narrative. I thought people were insane to believe that we never landed on the moon, then I realized why it had to be done and watched this 4 hour documentary. It never comes to ANY conclusions, it lets you decide.

https://www.amazon.com/American-Moon-Massimo-Mazzucco/dp/B07HB4XC1S

He's one of the most sound documentarist. He leaves no bias in his work. He also created teh Doc, September 11th New Pearl Harbor. \

EDIT:: Did NOT COMPUTE SARCASM

[–]hennaojisan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Mine was sarcasm too supposedly indicating that I do not believe anybody went there yet. I guess we need that old reddit symbol /s.

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

You can see that we landed on the moon with a good telescope. It'd cost you about a grand to test, and then you could sell the equipment.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Watch American Moon, we never went and Nasa knows this, that's why they lost all the telemetry data.

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you test it, and don't find anything, and do so repeatedly, then you'd have hard, incontrovertible proof. I'd assume you were doing it wrong, but if you explained what you were doing in enough detail and you were still not getting anything then that'd seriously shake my beliefs.

If you asked a university student of the right field to help you, and they failed to find anything, you'd convince them. It'd be a quick, easy way to convince anyone, actually. You could even get it into local newspapers, if you convinced three or so people.

I understand if you don't have money to sink into this, though.

[–]flippermode 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This made me laugh but seriously, they all look like radioactive funyons.

[–]Mnemonic 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://media.dumpert.nl/foto/c690d42d_2019_04_11_confirmed.jpg.jpg

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Second one. One of them looks like a black hole, and the others don't.

You picked the wrong cardiac images. Some of them actually look similar.

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Other images of blurry red circles exist. What a fantastic observation /s

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Idk, I don't trust NASA, so why should I trust this picture?

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't know, you don't have to trust it, but not trusting it because it roughly matches another blurry picture is a poor reason