How would your ideal entity treat and deal with the Internet?

Minedwe · 2020-07-12T21:19:08+00:00

Censorship is completely useless because the deep/dark web or whatever you want to call it exists, so banning dissidence would be useless and inflammatory. Porn would be completely banned and free speech on the internet would be regulated into existence (except for illegal sentiments like promoting crime/revolt against the government).

IThinkEricssonHitUs · 2020-07-11T15:44:05+00:00

[deleted]

SecureTheInevitable · 2020-07-11T21:53:04+00:00

a mixture of North Korea's intranet and China's firewall is the most ideal. A intranet will increase the speed of the internet, cyber security and the government can curate the content of websites. I don't think a intranet can be the sole way of accessing the web because international commerce is a public interest and academic research in foreign countries. The government will be able to whitelist and blacklist sites that harm their populace but I would take it a step further and sandbox the internet. There is no possible way of using a VPN unlike in China to skirt content restrictions if you don't have direct access to a foreign IP Address. It would slow down the internet considerably but companies that need the speed like real time applications such as video games and content streaming services will have to register with the government.

aukofthecovenant · 2020-07-12T02:37:57+00:00

Leave it alone.

LadyEuropaEffy · 2020-07-13T00:34:44+00:00

Well, I recognise the internet is not 100% controllable due to its global nature and the dark web, but porn and other degenerate material would be banned and relegated to what it was decades ago, something only weirdos will put the effort in to seek out. Not like now where you can access the most screwed up stuff after a 2 second Google search.

I'm not against free speech or the whole 'marketplace of ideas' concept, so I would allow social media, etc to platform all political views (excluding treason and incitement/threats of violence). I'm assuming this ethnostate exists sometime in the future of our current reality and the population would be educated in Race Realism, the JQ and the history of the failures of multicultural/multiracial societies such as modern day USA, UK, France, etc. There would be no White Guilt.

So yeah, when someone starts feeling sorry for starving Africans or some other third world group living under a shit regime of their own creation and starts to bellyache that they should be given refuge, sane society will just ignore them or politely tell them to go fuck themselves.

RebeccaCuntsley · 2020-07-11T21:45:11+00:00

I'm not sure if there is a solution here. You can censor and control narratives but at the end of the day it's all window dressing.

I'm beginning to realize that there is a shocking widespread lack of rationalism among the world population and I'm toying with the idea of there being problems that can't be solved without deeper neurology. When a BLM activist says "defund the police" you can roughly translate this to "make life better for us". There is no adaptation to objective reality to these people- they don't process the calculus of what they are saying. So when Don Lemon says that something is "his truth", he is being sincere. You can't fight that with speech regulation.

debatealtright

Got user flair? ⇧ ⇧ ⇧

MODERATORS