all 24 comments

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist[S] 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

...

I hate to keep telling you this, but let me just say: three years ago, I was the first person banned from everything on the internet. The media called for my ban. I wouldn’t have been banned if it wasn’t for the media. They said: “This is a special case, this man is a neo-Nazi and a white supremacist, he must be silenced, we need to make a special rule just for him.”

Now – a mere three years later – they are openly frothing at the mouth, demanding the President of the United States be silenced for “disinformation.” They have decided what is true, therefore, being the arbiters of truth, and the ones who determine the nature of reality itself, they are in a position to decide what you think.

...

[–]marc_gee 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

However it is good. We need conservatives to be banned so they will fight the system.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

also so we dont have to read their schizophrenic takes

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

No, we need to enforce the First Amendment. I'm not anywhere near ready to just ignore the arguably most important law in America just because our enemies do. What we need to do is sue the fuck out of anyone that dares to violate our civil rights.

[–]marc_gee 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Conservatives getting banned is one possible way the first amendment could become enforced on social media.

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, I suppose maybe. I've just got a knee jerk reaction against a rash of "First Amendment is for children" theme around here lately. IMO without 1A there is NO freedom or control of your own destiny beyond solitude.

[–]ifuckredditsnitches_Resident Pajeet 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

No, we need to enforce the First Amendment.

You and what army?

What we need to do is sue the fuck out of anyone that dares to violate our civil rights.

Probably good for raising awareness about the corruption of the System

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You and what army?

The US army. What the fuck is with all this anti-1A around here?

[–]ifuckredditsnitches_Resident Pajeet 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'm not anti-1A I'm just realistic that at this point it's lost forever, just like 4A was.

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

lol no

[–]Wrangel 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

At no time in history has a movement been allowed to use the system's infrastructure for a revolt. Do you think East Germany allowed dissidents to get airtime on TV? Do you think the Bolsheviks could use their "rights" in 1914? People on the dissident right are pissed that they can't use mainstream media as an equal platform while forgetting that people who fight against the system are usually shot or thrown in a gulag. We aren't especially mistreated by the system, we are treated shockingly nicely and we should be grateful for that.

We have to stop living in fantasy-land and thinking that we can make some good arguments and make some funny videos and win in a fair election. We have to get real and realize that every system will defend itself including this one even if this one is unusually weak and mild. There have been lots of successful regime changes, massive shifts that have happened with far greater resistance but they have planned accordingly.

[–]VarangianRasputin 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

including this one even if this one is unusually weak and mild.

I just want to highlight this. There is this weird angle that Blackpillers and SiegeFags like to use where they basically say, "This system is too strong it has it's fingers in so many pies, its over bro."

I don't think a system has ever handled dissent as poorly as this rotten one. There's no subtlety or tact; this election is proof of that. Literally nobody believes this election was legit besides a small fraction of braindead looneys. Even Biden-Supporters can see it, it's just that they don't care.

The system is akin to a clown juggling knives while doing laps on a unicycle; all he needs to go down is for somebody to throw a pie at him.

[–]AFutureConcern 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The difference is that the system today has a vastly larger amount of power. The majority of people are glued to their smartphones and absorb media all day, every day. In 1914 most people formed their opinions from their real-life experiences, and groups could form and freely associate. Today, freely-associating groups can form on Facebook but they'll be shut down the moment they pose a threat to the system. In fact, with Trump out of the picture, even milquetoast right-wing populism will be purged from online spaces, as already happened to r/The_Donald.

I fear that the level of technology may mean we soon are past the point of no return, and the system will have control forever.

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

the system's infrastructure

The internet is not "the system's" infrastructure, it's the people's infrastructure.

...we are treated shockingly nicely and we should be grateful for that.

Fuck that noise. Yes, I know the gulag is coming if we don't nip this censorship in the bud.

[–]president_camacho 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I noticed that right before the election former never Trumper Paul Singer attempted a coup at Twitter, trying once again to oust Dorsey. I doubt the timing was coincidence. Singer failed by a narrow margin, but either Dorsey got the message, had to agree to more of their demands and give up some control, or read between the lines and knows that he has to go out of his way to please the Jewish oligarchs that have been gunning for him for years. His increasingly brazen attempts to censor Trump likely arise in part from this.

Jews desperately want control of twitter, as its perhaps the only mainstream platform left that allows any criticism of them, mainly because they havent yet perfected the AI or hired enough kosher approved monitors to police everything. That will change the minute Singer or any of his fellow tribesman total gain control. Singer probably already has enough leverage now to begin forcing a serious crackdown on twitter, which will likely be oncoming once the Jews that will inevitably swamp Biden's administration set up shop.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you. Yup, and Singer gave Trump's campaign millions of dollars. Singer then pretended to hate Trump. The target is not Trump, it's you and me.

Paul Singer is a Zionist Jew.

Where ever censorship starts, it's always a wealthy Jew, usually a Zionist, taking control.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

By now it should be apparent to even the less astute that the two party system of government is controlled by two complicit factions. The Zionist Party of Israel ( GOP ) which conducts war hawk foreign policy agendas for Israel and a complicit MIC that profits off the wars and the useful statists at the DNC who do whatever the Council on Foreign Relations orders them to do which has free hand with the domestic stuff. Then you have people like Bill Kristol who could care less about your livelihood in the US, why should he though– he only cares abut using American soldiers for Israel’s wars. He’s totally fine with unimpeded mass immigration into the US, admits to it in fact, but we have Trump to stop him. Oh wait Trump is friends with all the Neoconservative Zionists and his literal WALL will never be built and why should it be built when more illegals have entered the country under his watch than did under the deportee in chief Obama. It’s almost as if Trump is a controlled opposition but he does the occasional flag hugging as a publicity stunt, so NOW I’M REALLY CONFUSED. Americans no longer enjoy Representative government, because we get what we allow and deservedly so. Todays world is PSYOP’s stacked upon more PSYOP’s, socially engineering us into the coming totalitarian technocracy.

BACK TO SINGER

As well as contributing to private initiatives, Singer also actively seeks to persuade other Republicans to support gay marriage.[11][107] He has joined other Wall Street executives in support of LGBT equality and stated that same-sex marriage promotes “family stability” and that in a time when “the institution of marriage in America has utterly collapsed,” the fact that gay couples want to marry “is kind of a lovely thing and a cool thing and a wonderful thing.”[108][109]

I don't think it really promotes family stability because you can not have babies in the traditional sense, but whatever. It's weird that he also brings the negative into the equation, that negative being traditional marriage.

OH BUT WAIT FOLKS!!!!!!!

Singer was a MAJOR funder of the #neverTrump campaign, Singer – the CEO of $34 billion hedge fund firm Elliott Management – left no stone unturned in an effort to stop Trump from gaining the Republican nomination last year. One example: The Washington Free Beacon, a conservative website backed by Singer, was the first to engage Fusion GPS, a political research firm, to do opposition research on Trump and other Republicans, the New York Times reported Friday.

So he loathes Trump, BUT WAIT!!!!

He [ Paul Singer] supported Trump’s inaugural committee with $1 million together with 25 other billionaires.[83]”

Oh okay, I get it now.


This here Proves that Zionists control BOTH SIDES and play it off like they hate the other side when they support the other side too.

[–]asterias 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

And this wouldn't have happened if Trump had created an account on Gab or other sites a couple of years ago.

[–]VarangianRasputin 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Trump didn't crack down on media censorship in the last 4 years. Like, he did literally nothing about his supporters getting doxed and the like. His inaction is being punished now, and he should have seen it coming. Really makes me wonder if he knows what he's up against.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's not really Trump that matters, he's a ZioCon after all. The target, I've seem is woke progressives who now about the people who did 9/11. Anyone who exposes Zionism is eventually shadow-banned.

Hundreds of Palestinian accounts I saved are now gone.

[–]ifuckredditsnitches_Resident Pajeet 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Good. Trump should be banned and actively promote Telegram.

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You're not American are you?

[–]ifuckredditsnitches_Resident Pajeet 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm from America I just want Trump to be forced to go against big tech