all 10 comments

[–]Minedwe 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Something like Orania could work, there's immense open spaces in Australia, even if you exclude uninhabitable regions. It would face backlash but there's not much they can do (at least for now) if done right.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

There's many areas right now that are functionally Oranias though not explicitly so. As you can guess most of them are outside of urban areas. Many of them are on the most beautiful coasts we have where you'll barely ever see a non-White face.

[–]Minedwe 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

That's good. Hopefully they stay that way, however with Australia's current trajectory that seems somewhat unlikely.

[–]Jacinda 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I quite like this video It's put out by Sustainable Population Australia.

In Canada the immigrants are being encouraged to move to non-diverse areas — I wouldn't be surprised if Australia didn't attempt something similar.

[–]sylla94 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I went to Sydney about half a decade ago and had to keep checking that I wasn't in fucking hong kong or singapore or some shit, especially in the city/malls. was a pretty major redpill

[–]Jacinda 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The real problem is mass migration which is creating problems for everyone without providing much in the way of economic benefit.

The Population Ponzi Primer [14:00]

Leith van Onselen points out that current growth projections mean the government's 'Big Australia' policy will push the population beyond 40,000,000 by 2050, most of it concentrated in the main urban centers.

The blog Macro-business has a number of articles on immigration. Here is one describing the costs to the nation's infrastructure.

Macro-business:

After all, it is the extra 100,000-plus people flooding Melbourne every year that is causing the congestion and driving the costly infrastructure ‘fixes’. And in an already built-up city like Melbourne, the cost of retrofitting new infrastructure to accommodate greater population densities necessarily becomes prohibitively expensive because of the need for land buy-backs, tunneling, as well as disruptions to existing infrastructure – basic ‘dis-economies of scale’.

Don’t just take my word for it. The PC’s Shifting the Dial: 5 year productivity review, released in October, explicitly noted that infrastructure costs will inevitably balloon due to our cities’ rapidly growing populations [Cont...]

It is estimated that is costs over 100,000 in public money for each new person added to the population.

It's essential (both for Australians and for the environment) that the immigration spigot be turned off.

The economic benefits are essentially zero.

VDare:

[I]mmigration is economically unnecessary: It was a British economist, the great Peter Bauer, who first and most forcefully made this point to me. You can't reason from more people to more production. The key factor, rather, is technical innovation–new ideas. Thus, the idea that third world immigration is necessary to support ageing first world 'baby boomers' does not add up. (Of course, it is always possible that first world governments will make a mess of things and turn to immigration to stave off the problem).In the US, the validity of Bauer's point has been born out by the National Research Council's 1997 compendium, The New Americans reflecting the consensus among labor economists. It found the net aggregate economic benefit to native-born Americans from the enormous influx accidentally triggered by the 1965 immigration act is nugatory–less than $10 billion a year, in an economy of $10 trillion.

Immigrants do increase gross domestic product (GDP), but they receive most of the benefit themselves. Moreover, this doesn't count transfers like education, which amount to a significant net loss. The Economist has rightly characterized this as “chickenfeed”–without, typically, altering its generally romantic view of immigration. America is being transformed for nothing. I have no doubt the same is true for Europe. [Cont...]

[–]UserAetheria 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Its sad to say but I think Australia will be extremely difficult to save. It certainly isn't impossible but right now it feels like a lost cause. The problem is that there isn't any awareness about the system that is replacing whites, nor is there any white consciousness to fight that system. People think that the same level of white people will just be around forever, or worse they don't care. It doesn't help that white flight causes people to not notice the problem. Australian apathy is a huge issue.

I live in Western Sydney, which is the area they've placed many muslim migrants and other non-white ethnicities. Its an ethnic hellhole. When I go shopping at the local mall I always make a conscious effort to count the amount of young white people that I see. My count normally results in 0. But there is always an uncountable amount of arabic looking men, or women wearing a hijab. We are losing so many whites in my area and only non-whites are moving in. This won't stop, it will just continue to accelerate as they allow more people to immigrate and those previous immigrants to birth more children.

I think that this will continue to happen all over the country. First the major cities and then the smaller ones. The rural and coastal towns retain a majority white population. But the problem is that they don't get to see the takeover happening. This is a problem because white consciousness doesn't increase if people don't get to notice the problem. I can compare my childhood to now and see how much things have changed and it's only going to accelerate.

I've mentioned muslim migrants in my area but the biggest issue is actually china. Asian immigrants, mostly from china, are pouring into this country. Give it maybe 100 years at this current rate and Australia will probably end up looking more like an Asian country than a white or muslim one.

What can be done? We don't have control of media, financial institutions or government. Those same institutions hate us and regularly poison the message of our ideology. We'll get a few unimportant towns voting for our nationalist party (One Nation) but that's it. They're allowed say anything they want about us. They can say we're not human (by falsely labelling us as Nazi) and that seems to be perfectly fine. But if we say a transgendered woman is actually a man, we get viciously attacked. If we don't act perfect, if we act out even by a single person, our entire ideology gets roasted. Social media goes through a series of bans, payment processors go after any website hosts, etc.

Australia can't really save itself. We need Europe or North America to do the heavy lifting. If America somehow reversed itself back into a white ethnostate (won't ever happen I know), then the sheer weight of its cultural influence would help Australia look back to that path too.

Apologies for the somewhat rambly post.

[–]Nasser[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you're still in Australia I recommend you keep pushing but stay safe and remain secretive. Spread awareness, if you have a printer, I suggest you put up posters containing the information presented in this thread regarding the negatives of immigration. Participate mainly in social media where you stay relatively hidden like here, reddit, maybe twitter etc. If you have right leaning friends, keep trying to push them further.

[–]Nasser[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Those unimportant towns can add up. We should also look into infiltrating out enemies.

[–]IRONICALLY_A_NAZI 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

As a non american as well, you must realize the head of the snake must be chopped off. If America is still around, any other country being "saved" will be destroyed swiftly. The US must be dismantled before any other white nation can be rebuilt.