all 38 comments

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

David Frum's twitter feed response is the most annoying fucking jewish bullshit with "scare quotes" around so called "replacement". When I go to the store and I'm the only White person in sight in a city that was 90% White 50 years ago, yeah, I call that replacement, you fucking lying Jew.

e.g.

The most politically important "great replacement" under way in the United States is the "replacement" of conservative Christians by their own liberal and secular children and grandchildren.

Gee Dave, where'd they get the idea to be so liberal? Perhaps the 24/7 media and academic guilt bombardment? As if he cares about the decline of Christianity, which I suppose he does since it removes the bullshit "they hate Jews because we killed Jesus" lie.

[–]Jacinda 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The ridiculous thing is that even the UN talks about replacement:

Kerry Bolton:

The Rightist claim that Europeans are being replaced in their own homelands by alien migrants and refugees is lambasted as a ‘lie’, and in the words of the ever-dubious Wikipedia as a ‘nationalist right wing conspiracy theory’. [...]

Yet from at least 2001 the United Nations started referring to ‘Replacement Migration’. The theory laid the foundation for the U.N. Migration Compact. The U.N. document Replacement Migration, Is It a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations statistically examines the demographic trends of ‘developed’ states, USA, Europe, E.U., Russia, Japan, and Korea.

The issue is that of aging population due to low fertility and the increasing duration of life expectancy. Hence, a looming economic crisis with the demographic imbalance. The solution is to replenish the labour market with migrants, by population transfers from the developing to the developed states. [Cont...]

His article, critiquing the UN's aims from a right wing perspective, deserves to be more widely known:

Kerry Bolton:

The UN Global Migration Compact: Origins and Aims

[Snip...]

Economic globalization is the real push for open borders, and a primary means of destroying the barriers to international capital, not only economically, but socially, culturally and ethnically. This explains why the international oligarchs hatched this Compact, under the guise of what is now called “social investment.”

While the U.N. refers to the integrity of the states, this is more double-speak as is also refers to states as being fluid and without fixity of heritage or destiny, “making us all countries of origin, transit and destination.” This means a globalized mass humanity without roots, able to be relocated across the world as marketing needs require; the perfect scenario for what G. Pascal Zachary lauded as “the global me.”

[Snip...]

The U.N. Global Migration Compact is an initiative of global capital. The aim is the free flow of labour, as part of the free flow of resources and capital to benefit an international oligarchy. As is usually the case, it is done behind a humanitarian façade. [Cont...]

Replacement, or white shift as sociologists like to call it, is only a conspiracy if we mention it.

[–]arainynightinskyrim 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

The comments on the NYT article are something else. I'm glad such a popular person like Tucker is starting to tell the truth about the situation we're in, I would have never expected that he'll use the term "replacement".

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

The comments on the NYT article aresomething else.

Link?

[–]arainynightinskyrim 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I hate these rootless cosmopolitans.

[–]arainynightinskyrim 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

We all do.

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

They should just call it "editorial board addendum", since no divergent comments will be published.

[–]arainynightinskyrim 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I remember reading some articles from 3 or 4 years ago that were clearly anti white and the comments were not that bad but now it's just pure anti white propaganda. In the end it's the Jew York Times that we're talking about so no surprise here, actually the only surprise is that they even allowed comments that go against the narrative to begin with back in the day.

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Are the comments pro or anti Tucker?

[–]arainynightinskyrim 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

The article is not about Tucker but about "Whites fearing demographic change". https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/06/us/politics/capitol-riot-study.html#commentsContainer

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Whites should well fear demographic change. It is patently obviously detrimental to our well being. (grammar?)

[–]arainynightinskyrim 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Of course they should fear, the thing is that the vast majority of them are not even aware it's happening.

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[removed]

    [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I love comments like that because they get past all the usual bullshit the left tells us when they try and sell an unwilling population the mass immigration proposal -- things like 'it's good for muh economy' and such -- and breaks it down to what it really is RACIAL REVENGE. Those type of comments turn people into White racialists because they suddenly realize what the shot is.

    [–]EuropeanAwakening14 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Their argument for mass immigration is that natives were destroyed by mass immigration. They also hold Whites today responsible for what our ancestors did wrong (no other group is held to that standard), but at the same time we can not take credit for their good accomplishments and we can not be privileged from their accomplishments in our own society. They are so dishonest.

    [–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    It is mostly a lying narrative. Every thing about Trump and Conservatives in framed through the lens of of the race by liberals and leftists. Ironically their ideology is far more racial than the average conservative. The January 6th event was automatically framed as an insurrection driven by white supremacy when it happened. The reality most of those people are just conservatives getting caught up in hyper politicization of our society. They are trying stop "communist" democrats from taking over America rather than taking America back for white people.

    [–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    On another note, Tucker's segment on "gun control" was REALLY close to the bone, saying "they're not doing gun control where the real gun crimes are, they're not even prosecuting gun crimes, they're disarming the exact opposite, the places where guns are ubiquitous and gun crime is practically non-existent".

    edit: He goes on to state that 5% of murders with gun were committed with rifles of all kinds, let alone "assault weapons". But that's what they're going to try to confiscate and outlaw. Meanwhile Quantarious will still have a stash of handguns for drive-by's, and won't be prosecuted when caught. Tucker said "it's not about saving lives, it's about disarming the citizens".

    [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

    Tucker's now so big he can say more than ever before.

    [–]DragonerneJesus is white 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    He backstabbed the right during election season.
    He lost so many of his right wing viewers because of that. Now he is given leeway to get back those viewers, so he can subvert them better in the future and get a chance of backstabbing again.

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Honestly, Trump losing was the better outcome. It would've been 4 more years of based black guys and plan trusting.

    [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    What you say is true; but Tucker should have stood up strongly against the election fraud. He knows it was stolen. He frames himself as 'fair' and 'truth driven'. Stolen elections are a major problem in a republic. The populace has the right to know if they've transitioned into some type of Oligarchy or Kritarchy now complete with fully manufactured elections. We can't have republicans continuing to go out to vote or engage in the political process under these new circumstances. That's time that could be spent moving towards the dissident right and parallel institutions. The dissident right needs warm bodies. There will be a time where we are totally isolated from the NPC population and will be forced to work with the number we have.

    I haven't watched anything from him since the election and don't plan on watching him again.

    The biggest frustration for me is that Tucker has a large enough audience and a loyal enough audience that he could go fully independent and deal a severe blow to legacy media formats. Tucker would still command a LOT of eyeballs and there is money to be made in independent media. Especially as more mainstream commentators transition and legitimize it.

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I don't know. Tucker honestly looks like a made guy who is secretly sympathetic to WN causes. He's one of them, since he's the no 1 talk show host in the US, I wouldn't be surprised if they even had blackmail on him, he is an important person. But I think he sympathizes with the WN cause and tries to test the limits.

    He also got fed up with Trump towards the end. He couldn't openly call Trump a charlatan and a fraud as that would've been a violation of finklethink, plus boomertards would immediately stop watching him. I guess he saw Trump's defeat as a good riddance moment.

    That, plus I don't think the election fraud was allowable discussion for the kosher right media. I never watch MSM because its all too boring and cliche, but I don't think any fox host promoted(or allowed to) election fraud.

    [–]angryturtle 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    What's notable about this are the groups that are openly calling for Carlson to be fired. The ADL and other Jewish lobby groups, including J street(literally a pro Israel lobby). Carlson never said a word about Jews, or race, or any other country besides the US, so it's interesting they would be the ones freaking out. His piece was exclusively about democratic party electoral shenanigans.

    What's particularly hilarious is J street and the ADL, two blatantly Jewish nationalist organizations both specifically complained about white nationalism. Both groups bitterly oppose any non Jewish immigration to Israel. So it's nationalism for me but not for thee goy.

    [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    There's a Biblical phrase which I'm always reminded of when this type of thing happens 'The guilty flee when none pursueth' and it's so true of Jews. When Trump was railing against the financial, globalist elite during the 16 campaign the Jews went out of their minds because they automatically thought -- rightfully so -- that Trump was in a way talking about them. Of course no one mentioned them by name but the guilty flee when none pursueth.

    So now when Carlson -- who's a philo-semite at least on the surface -- talks about replacement levels of immigration who's losing their shit? The guilty Jews of course who know they've pursued this policy and are rather worried that people might find out.

    [–]Girondin 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    He did he did not mean it in a racial sense in the end of monologue which shows the libtards short attention span. This Nikki Martinez is clearly retarded and should learn to spell. She is so obviously white but she larps that she is "mexicana" (I understand that mexico is a nationality and you can be any race but she is clearly using it to gain POC points)

    [–]arainynightinskyrim 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Greenblatt himself retweeted her so she's probably a jew.

    [–]Jacinda 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Kevin MacDonald has written a 3,000 word response:

    Sailer points out that the same ADL, calling for Carlson's removal, is against replacement migration when it applies to Israel:

    Unz:

    ADL: Immigration and high fertility of minorities would lead to a catastrophic great replacement

    He quotes the ADL:

    With historically high birth rates among the Palestinians, and a possible influx of Palestinian refugees and their descendants now living around the world, Jews would quickly be a minority within a bi-national state, thus likely ending any semblance of equal representation and protections. In this situation, the Jewish population would be increasingly politically – and potentially physically – vulnerable.

    It is unrealistic and unacceptable to expect the State of Israel to voluntarily subvert its own sovereign existence and nationalist identity and become a vulnerable minority within what was once its own territory. [Cont...]

    The commenter NotSaying (Comment #20) suggests quite reasonably:

    Tucker Carlson should discuss this on his show. He should tell his viewers what the letter to Fox said and then quote the ADL position on keeping Israel majority Jewish at all costs.

    Let him ask the ADL to why America is different than Israel when it comes to immigration. Let him show graphics that show that whites will soon be a minority and ask them to explain how what he said was inaccurate.

    [–]arainynightinskyrim 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    If and when Tucker calls out the ADL and Greenblatt on the hypocrisy about replacement in Israel that day will be a good day.

    [–]angryturtle 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    At some point people are going to have to take a stand against the adl. Pewdiepie started to then punted it away. To date no one else has done it, which is puzzling because even non jewish far lefties(real ones) hate the adl. Almost no one legit likes them. They dictate through fear. They are bullies, so taking them down would make a lot of people relieved.

    [–]arainynightinskyrim 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    The vast majority of jews support ethno nationalism in Israel but hate it when it's europeans being nationalistic which means that the vast majority of them also support the ADL.

    [–]ifuckredditsnitches_Resident Pajeet 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    This is good but let's not forget that Tucker is no ally. Man wears a kabbalah bracelet and eats at Comet Ping Pong

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    kabbalah bracelet

    Bruh...

    [–]ifuckredditsnitches_Resident Pajeet 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    [–][deleted]  (5 children)

    [removed]

      [–][deleted]  (4 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]Girondin 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Search up native american groups in the united states look at their leaders, look at their members. They are all white! At Most some could be argued to be castizo. It isn't disgenenous since they have actually the most native blood even though it is small.

        If they defend native americans they defend whites.

        [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

        Those poll numbers are nuts. Trump had a higher approval rating among Amerindians than whites.

        [–][deleted]  (1 child)

        [deleted]

          [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          There seems to be a certain bond between Amerindians and whites.

          There clearly is. Amerindians - when they mix - almost always mix with whites, especially their women. The Pocahontas story is a cliché for a reason.