Is colonialism analogous to mass immigration?

submitted by [deleted] from self.debatealtright

[deleted]

all 6 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]arainynightinskyrim 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Mass migration is worse, colonialists were tiny in number and eventually left, migrants are ethnically replacing a population and destroying it.

[–]Nasser 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Possibly but I see as a whats done is done situation at this point. The nations of Australia,US and NZ were founded and primarily built by Whites. The institutions,laws,culture, economy etc were all established by Whites and we can and we should preserve that out of respect for the ancestors and descendants who inhabited and will inhabit the nation. The natives of those nations fought back and resisted but they failed, as is the current of history. Right of conquest. Whites are in a similar position except our threat is internal. The primary thing that we can do to preserve those nations for the White race(70% of the work) is to ban all non white immigration or even all immigration all together. The rest involves securing the borders and a White natalist campaign. Our enemies are mainly internal globalists,race traitors,cosmopolitans,parasites,kelptocrats etc and some external e.g American influence or non whites arranging overwhelming mass migrations such as the central american caravans or Erdogen calling for Turks to breed out 5 children.. The internal enemy for us is the biggest threat and the one we are working to defeat. The natives of those nation should 100% be treated with respect and should have their own reservations that support maintaining their culture at a high standard of living. They are not a demographic,economic or influential threat to Whites whatsoover.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No. There is a big difference. Colonialists went to new territory to extract resources, labor, and build great nations. Non-white immigrants are invading the west because they lack the intelligence required to maintain the quality of life they see whites enjoying and see invasion as a solution to obtaining it.

Obviously this isn't a long term solution because they will just drag the west down to their level of poverty, corruption, and stupidity. No magic dirt to be found here.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well for one the conquering of the Territory I live on was done 100's of years before I was born. What exactly do you want me to do about that? Travel through time?

Second this isn't about moral consistency it's about, to steal a term from our Jewish friends, facts on the ground. Im Australian and we've created a society here that is a reflection of white Europe. We're not just going to up and leave. What I call for is simply a complete moratorium on immigration, paid repatriation programs for those who desire to leave and pro-natal policies directed at Europeans to encourage higher birth rates. Obviously these aren't exactly going to happen tomorrow but they policies that could be adopted tomorrow if the will was there. I can't go back in time and stop the colonisation of the Australian continent. That's just something that can't be done.

Furthermore in Australia natives are citizens of this fine country who enjoy all the rights and privileges that comes with. They have semi-autonomous zones that are theirs much like native Americans and they have rights explicitly guaranteed by our constitution.

Finally to put it simply two wrongs don't make a right and I actually think it's for the people who support the idea of mass immigration and the displacement of whites today yet decry the evils of whites doing the same in the past to explain to me how one can be good but not the other. Scratch the surface of that type and get past all the cant and usually the answer is simply that they view immigration and displacement of whites as payback for historical crimes.

[–]Richard_Parker 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Colonialism is immigration. You wouldn't have Israeli settlers in Palestine without Jewish immigrants. You wouldn't have Japan colonizing the Korean Peninsula without Japanese people.

However, the world before the 1900s had everyone play by the same rules of conquering, so it's a bit lame to apply modern problems to ancient issues. So it's no more analogous than trying to prosecute Genghis Khan for war crimes before there was even a Geneva Convention.