all 6 comments

[–]Erasmus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The ultimate goal of the APA is to declare racism a mental illness in the DSM.

We already have mechanisms in place to take away the rights of the mentally ill, and since only whites can be racist according to their definition, any white who pushes back against the anti-white system will have some or all of their rights taken from them. We're not far from this.

The mental health industry already uses loaded terms like calling racism a "pandemic", and pointing out that they treat white people and non-white people differently isn't going to make them stop doing it. That's sort of the point of creating these systems in the first place.

You would think this would bother more white people than it does.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I also encourage you to look at their staff page who make up this website.

https://mhanational.org/mha-staff

Plenty of Whites are still in control of these organizations, and yet they support or publish articles that do nothing but speed up white replacement. So there's clearly an internal struggle going on where Whites are fighting against their own interests.

[–]insta 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The whole argument of racial trauma presupposes the existence of a white supremacist state. Anyone who believes that are unlikely to be swayed by any arguments you can make.

Look forward to seeing your work tho.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The whole argument of racial trauma presupposes the existence of a white supremacist state.

Maybe the Left thinks that way, but I would like to flip this idea on its head and make the concept universal.

For example, I don't think it's a complete lie to say that exposing people to certain media can have a psychological effect on them. This is already proven with other studies like Women's anorexia, or showing children professional wrestling videos can raise aggression levels.

So when it comes to "racial trauma", it's very candid of this organization to leave out zero mentions of White people feeling fatigue or being oppressed. Did they think no one would ever try this experiment out and later come back to refute them with it? And once that information is out, they can either try their best to suppress it, or become forced to admit they were wrong and make changes to their article that accepts White people are being physically harmed as well. The later is how science normally works. New evidence displaces the old.

[–]insta 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But the whole argument presupposes a white supremacist state. Whites as a class by definition can’t be oppressed in any meaningful way in a white supremacist state.

That’s the problem with all this “scientific” research, they start their research on a faulty premise then purposefully use a fucked up methodology. It happens all the time.

[–]aukofthecovenantWhite man with eyes 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So the Left has evidence that unconscious racism can cause serious health effects in populations.

A bit more skepticism on your part would do you good. What you quoted is not evidence - it is say-so from people with obvious conflicts of interest, ideological and probably also financial. You should not just believe it outright.

For example, in a 100% white community, are we to believe that white supremacy is causing these people health issues?

By "these people" I assume you mean whites, since there would be no one else in a 100% white community. In that case the obvious answer is no, because whites are presumably immune to the miasma of "wHiTe SoOpReEmAcY" that they supposedly emit.

Or, how exactly can you cure a group of people who are carrying the "white supremacist" genes and spread it everywhere they have white children?

Basically, by requiring whites to subordinate their desires and interests to those of nonwhites. It would never be "cured", because then the racket would have to end, but we already see calls for white people to "make room for Black voices" and such. That nebulous verbiage could in time become a lot more concrete and backed by force.

Perhaps, the solution to racial trauma that this science article points out is to keep non-whites separated so their mental health levels don't decline?

That would work. Obviously a counterargument would be "White people just have to do whatever the nonwhite people ask them to do, then everyone will be happy", and some normies will have trouble choosing our position over that one.