Pro-life victories have at least two instrumental goods for the DR.

The first is simple. It plain and simply makes Leftists even more mad, like a smaller version of Trump's victory. That in itself is meaningless, but consequently they then threaten to do various things which benefit us. Emigrate? They will move around other people like themselves, leading to increased self-segregation. Commit violence? Pigs and Leftists fighting just means two problems weaken each other. They also only commit violence in their own areas (i.e. 'blue' cities—Portland has been Democrat-controlled since 1980). Suicide? Who cares if they off themselves? They become more deranged, insufferable and radicalized when they feel that an 'American Reich' or 'Gilead' is just around the corner to threaten 'progress'. Is there a single thing that they do at that point which is bad for us, excepting those in power? Fence-sitting is increasingly impossible—people increasingly need to define themselves in relation to the hegemonic Left; that is, I'm either with them or against them, but I cannot ignore them any longer. That leads to my second point.

It leads to increasing polarization along party lines, which is always good in countries where we are sympathetic to neither party. Polarization in a country where one party approaches being deserving of our support (e.g. Hungary) can work against us; polarization in a country where both parties are undeserving (e.g. Britain, US, Germany) only works for us. Dems and Repubs hating each other more and more is a good thing, since it damages the Dem-Repub duopoly and encourages the proliferation of new political parties (any of which may be better for us, few of which could possibly be worse than what we already have). The weakening of the duopoly also increases the chances of any other party actually forming government, which is simply impossible in the contemporary USA.

Alot of the pro-choice 'advantages' for the DR seem so pointless to me to the point that I can't add them to any comparison of the pros and cons of abortion. Hoping that it will reduce the number of non-whites so that White minoritization is delayed seems pointless. You're delaying it by, what, maybe a few months or years at the very most? National IQ will also decrease regardless of abortion, which at best just decreases the speed of the decline very slightly. Finding these arguments appealing just shows desperation. It's clutching at straws. I'd rather increased polarization, self-segregation, secessionism, etc.—things that encourage the creation of spaces in which we can survive while everyone else suffers the consequences of their own stupidity—over a minuscule delay in minoritization that changes nothing in the long run. So what if what would normally happen in 2033 is delayed till 2034 or 2035?

Even if abortion became so unpopular that opposing it destroyed the GOP, the void will likely only be rapidly filled by the Libertarians who would get most of the Republican electorate and who are barely any different or worse in the current year. Potentially better parties will inherit much of the rest and have a chance of becoming a serious third-party. So I do not care if the GOP commits collective suicide either, since they are but a few years behind the Dems on most issues like alphabet acceptance. The 'Caitlin for Governor' thing shows that they're even pro-trans in 2021. There will be exceedingly little difference between them, especially if the GOP establishment restores its control over the party.