all 10 comments

[–]thefirststoneThat's my purse! I don't know you! 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I do find it hilarious that the left-wing media tells us all the time how "evil" racism is

This is no gotcha.

"Racism" means power belonging to Whites. Any ethno-centric policy which eliminates Whites is anti-racist. This is the entire basis for "anti-colonialism", like the 1619 project.

You can't project your own definitions and beliefs of rationality on these people. It isn't hypocrisy for them to hate Whites. It's just openly, willfully malicious. This is the essence of politics.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

By the way, if you want to know why this story should make your blood boil, Liberals have come out in defense saying that these laws are to stop "Native American Genocide". I'm not making this up.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/texas-is-attempting-to-repeal-law-aimed-at-protecting-native-children-from-being-forcibly-placed-with-non-native-families.485824/post-73286836

It is not primarily about fairing better with tribal members vs outsiders. It is primarily about avoiding genocide. And while America is a pariah state on both the Convention on the Rights of the Child and UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, failing to give preference to tribal members is a violation of both human rights.

Now imagine if we apply this logic to what's happening in White countries? Millions of immigrants, illegals, refugees arrive. They refuse to assimilate, while also burning down statues and voting for political parties that threaten more immigration. The White population begins to dwindle or gets mixed out of existence like Brazil without being allowed to stop this.

But calling this process "White genocide" is suppose to be a conspiracy theory right?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It is a good law and should be applied on all adoptions. When you are adopted by person of your own race you have better outcomes.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

When you are adopted by person of your own race you have better outcomes.

For non-whites, their IQ goes up when raised by White parents instead of their own.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Transracial_Adoption_Study#Background_and_study_design

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Dunno. Still I think it's best to be raised by parents of same race.

I know a guy who has huge mental health issues and inferiority complex by just being a black person in a 99% white country. Could you imagine the mental health problems after being raised by white parents to boot? Complete rootlessness.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In the long term, I agree it's better for races to be segregated.

If non-whites want to overcome the IQ barrier, it would be better if they engaged in selective eugenics. Only let the high IQ members of each race adopt and raise children, instead of putting them in Low IQ (and thus poverty) environments.

[–]Salos60000Pragmatic European Nationalism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Honestly, does anyone really give a fuck about hypocrisy at this point? Calling it out has become completely meaningless.

[–]thefirststoneThat's my purse! I don't know you! 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Only because it isn't.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It gets attention because the Natives in particular have been getting aggressive lately.

They want more gibs, they want more land, they want more monuments destroyed or taken down. But, they get to hide behind genetic superiority so no other race can question them on it.

It's unironically Nazism, but in reverse. The Indians are the losers but somehow the government still listens to their every whim because of their racial status.

Edit: And to drive the Nazi point even further, there was even a book burning this week to get rid of media that offended Indians.

https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/book-burning-at-ontario-francophone-schools-as-gesture-of-reconciliation-denounced

[–]Jacinda 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

...they want to hoard ethnonationalism for themselves.

"Hoarding ethnonationalism" is a great turn of phrase. I might borrow it.