RICHARD SPENCER & ED DUTTON | Cruel To Be Kind: The Case For Abortion | RADIX LIVE | 2021-09-12

submitted by EthnocratArcheofuturist from self.debatealtright

Richard and Ed make a great case for abortion. Apparently abortion rates have been going down since the 1970s. It seems the people who are more likely to abort their offspring - aka crazy lefty women - are slowly selecting themselves out of the gene pool.

Video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gURvRTSTcI

all 10 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Just look at abortion stats. The only people who get abortions are the dregs of society anyway, who the fuck wants more of them?

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Many college-educated women have abortions. You're losing the offspring of intelligent women as well.

[–]TheJamesRocket 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Womens IQ scores are clustered more tightly than mens IQ scores. That is to say, there is less variation in female intelligence than in male intelligence. The fact that educated women chose not to reproduce doesn't matter very much.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's true but I think the mother's heritage does matter in the long run. It's entirely plausible that while she may have an IQ of 105 her father might have one of 120. By not reproducing, she's depriving society of her father's genes

[–]sylla94 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

inclined to agree. trash, especially non-white trash, love to sacrifice their unborn far more than even white trash.. which imo is good thing. the problem is decent whites across all societal brackets (but especially middle/upper class) not fucking enough

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]sylla94 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    some people might argue that mothers sacrificing their babies so that they can continue to engage in sexual gratification rather than deal with the resulting consequences and responsibilities of raising children is rather satanic.

    fortunately, we intellectual centrists are far more open minded

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    You care about babies being butchered in the womb so momma can be a zog bot at amazon? Bruh that's so cringe.

    Focus on something important, like Palestine.

    [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Exactly.

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    It seems the people who are more likely to abort their offspring - aka crazy lefty women - are slowly selecting themselves out of the gene pool.

    This type of hyper biological reductionism is why Dutton isn't really a good voice when it comes to politics. I think a much more likely scenario is the easy availability of the birth control pill. Women don't need messy abortions, they can just go on the pill and keep those pesky babies away.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I wouldn't say abortion has anything to do with society ending up having less libs.

    Most of our issues are societal and not genetical, it only works strictly as eugenic tool, meaning like literal health of the race (less genetically disabled people and mentally ill).

    I think it's far more likely that people become libs because it's "trendy" rather than it's predetermined by genetics.