Somewhere on reddit, a lightbulb goes off in White Man's head.

submitted by radicalcentristNational Centrism from self.debatealtright

For context, there was a story published recently that said 2/3rd's of Canadian are proud of their history, despite our interactions with the Native Indians. Naturally, shitlibs lose their minds and want Canadians to feel bad about themselves, whereas others are waking up and seeing the real agenda, like this post:

https://www.reddit.com/r/canada/comments/rnajzx/two_thirds_of_canadians_proud_of_countrys_history/hprvjqy/

No, they want you to feel shame if you were born white. Any kind of white, they are lumping all white people together but screetch if they get lumped together.

Careful with such antisemitic statement, Monopolisk. The Canadian government wants White people to be replaced, and it's very naughty to question why they're doing it.

Meanwhile, another White user points out that his parents fled Communism to come setup farmland in Canada

https://www.reddit.com/r/canada/comments/rnajzx/two_thirds_of_canadians_proud_of_countrys_history/hpropwx/

Same here. My ancestors fled from Ukraine because Stalin wanted to kill them and take their farmland. They weren't "settlers", they were refugees. They knew how to farm, though, so they became farmers here too.

Again with the antisemitic facts FaceDeer! Didn't you know Stalin was allowed mass murder millions of Europeans because it was the "progressive" thing to do?!?!

However, on another subreddit a "Conservative" Canadian misses the plot completely.

https://www.reddit.com/r/CanadaPolitics/comments/rna75d/two_thirds_of_canadians_proud_of_countrys_history/hpraa6o/

Because the two are not mutually exclusive. You can recognise Canada did the wrong thing in the past without hating it in the present. A few radicals on the left don’t realise this, and the harder they attack a multicultural and diverse nation the closer we come to a Tory government

"You see guys! Liberals are the real racists! If we import millions more third worlders, we will preserve both our culture and win elections!"

As for my own thoughts on the story, I don't feel sorry for the Indians one bit. I'm tired of hearing how they are the eternal victims who did nothing wrong. Europeans came here with superior weapons, challenged them to war, they lost and the winner got to build a 1st world civilization on land that was completely empty.

On top of that, Canada has already given the Indians tax free status and millions of dollars in free shit. Yet they keep buying mouthwash and drugs with the money, instead of investing it in building a semi-livable city. They're a race of idiots and we should have forcibly put them all on reserves without any internet or electricity access.

all 23 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (20 children)

If you don't feel sorry for native Americans one bit, why do you whine about negro-jewish alliance in great replacement scheme?

World would be much better place if there weren't colonial drives of Europeans, now every single bit of "superior technology" is bouncing off of our heads.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

If you don't feel sorry for native Americans one bit, why do you whine about negro-jewish alliance in great replacement scheme?

Because blacks & Jews don't build world class civilizations. In fact, they both aim to completely reverse it and create neo-Brazil or South Africa.

When the Native Americans got conquered by Whites, it was actually a major upgrade. Instead of getting their scalps cut off by Chief Wahoo, they now get to run Casinos without paying taxes. No other race gets such pampered treatment despite not contributing to world history.

World would be much better place if there weren't colonial drives of Europeans,

The Chinese love colonizing the world. The Muslims love colonizing the world. How come Whites are the only group not allowed to expand?

Prior to WW2, Europeans were 25% of the world's population, and nobody (except for other Whites) had a problem with it. Only after Hitler was defeated, did we see the creation of "white guilt" and "equality" that told Whites to be ashamed of their status as conquerors and scientific geniuses.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

conquering land is part of human nature, it's an innate drive, same as how we want to colonize space, probably not possible but it explains why things like star trek and other sci fi is popular.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

They had their own way of life, casinos and alcohol are just continuously ruining them.

I'm not saying Europeans should feel guilty about colonial past because white people aren't being attacked for colonialism anyways (as a Slav...), but it definitively didn't do us any good either and it's not something you should celebrate, first our own indigenous cultures got ruined, than we ruined other indigenous cultures.

Science and technology are not good for most people, and that's perfectly fine.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

They could always give these things up. In fact, I am in favor of completely segregating them from Western society, and having them return to their primal life on the reserves.

But we know they wont do that because it would mean admitting that the Indians were completely inferior to Europeans before they showed up.

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Well certainly on the north west the Indians were rich and did very well out of trapping and trading before and after Europeans showed up so going back to that would actually be working harder.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How "rich" where they?

It's like saying Africans were rich just because Mansa Musa had a lot of gold. Yet Mali today is still one of the poorest countries on Earth.

I just don't find any Indian achievement to be impressive. I would have more respect for them if they did admit they were outmatched and outsmarted by Europeans who showed up, and we went our peaceful ways and split. But I've never seen an Indian Malcolm X who wants that. In fact, this year alone Canada has been passing "truth and reconciliation" and even special holidays that are dedicated only to Natives without any of the Indians speaking out against it. It tells me they're fine with watching the status quo of White Canada being annihilated.

[–]negrogreBeing black is anti-white 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I get the feeling that you want to be taken over by the Japanese.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Japan being in charge of Asia would be infinitely better for everyone.

But Europe can still be ran by other Europeans.

[–]negrogreBeing black is anti-white 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I didn't say or imply Europe. I meant you specifically.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's just being stupid.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

why do you whine about negro-jewish alliance in great replacement scheme?

There's a difference between 'whining' about something and attempting to wake white people up to a threat. Whites have been so successful as a race that many of us have taken a poison pill of subversive ideologies. These psychological operations have blinded us to genuine threats.

You make a very strange and illogical argument. You're saying that if you don't have sympathy for a conquered nation then you yourself can't say anything when being conquered. Can't you see the faulty logic here? The Indians had a right to resist European encroachment and Europeans have a right to resist Jewish subversion of all forms.

I would also strongly push back on the idea that Indians were a nation or were really conquered. They were not very unified. They did not control all of North America. They had not resided on North American soil for as long as we are told by 'approved' academics. Large quantities died just from disease brought by explorers. Furthermore, Many tribes still have large tracks of land. Something that the bulk of whites cannot access or afford to have of their own. If 'land' is truly of value, which I believe it is, then Indians are being giving a massive resource and they are squandering it. Why should I sympathize with such a group?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

It's not illogical from different POV, that of a conqueror. Basically the golden rule, do unto others as you would have them do unto you, I'm not talking about "right" to resist, resistance is natural instinct.

I never claimed they were a nation, just that we have ruined their tribal way of life. Also I don't know what squandering means in this context, you mean like they didn't utilize it to fullest extent? If so, who cares.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I never claimed they were a nation, just that we have ruined their tribal way of life.

There where other Indians on the continent who arguably, would have done worse had they contacted them. Look at the Aztecs? If they made their way up to Canada, do you really think they would have shown those tribes mercy? They more than likely would have erected another temple, and start ripping out the hearts of every prisoner.

It's not fair to say Europeans completely ruined them when Indians today literally have a choice. Forget what happened hundreds of years of ago and either forcibly separate or move back to the reserves. I'm not against this. I'm saying, I WANT THIS.

Same with the Blacks in the U.S. I don't give a damn what the Confederacy and Slavery did. All those people have been dead for hundreds of years. But Black Americans absolutely can choose to either move to Africa or form their own country if they wish to escape "White oppression".

But neither the Indians or Blacks do this because they know life under White Man is not bad. They in fact, demand to get closer access to white people because they're deathly afraid of going back to savage.

The only other solution is for a White Nationalist government to seize power and make segregation mandatory. In which case, the whining will finally stop.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

That's the thing with technological society, it's not superior at all, it's like sugar, it's bad for you but it's addictive as hell. There's no point in talking about this now because it already happened, I simply said I wish Europeans didn't colonize these people in the past.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

That's the thing with technological society, it's not superior at all, it's like sugar, it's bad for you but it's addictive as hell.

It's more like protein and carbohydrates. The Whites had brandished guns which made them superior at hunting food or defending themselves from outside threats. Whereas the Indians only had sharp sticks or arrows to survive.

I simply said I wish Europeans didn't colonize these people in the past.

Truth be told, it wouldn't have made a difference. There are European countries that never colonized anyone, yet "white guilt" are still levied at them. I brought up WW2 in my original post, and Germany had been stripped of all its colonies.

Yet why does the media still call Hitler's Germany the worst thing ever? Because it was full of White people.

Meanwhile, Britain, France and the USSR had invaded the world many times over but they were still called the "heroes" of WW2.

[–]Foidblaster9000 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yet why does the media still call Hitler's Germany the worst thing ever? Because it was full of White people.

Meanwhile, Britain, France and the USSR had invaded the world many times over but they were still called the "heroes" of WW2.

I wonder why that might have been.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's Jewish control of our media, coupled with arrogance.

For example, remember how one argument against Germany was because they invaded neutral countries?

Well, both the UK & the Soviet Union did just that. In fact, they did so together!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Soviet_invasion_of_Iran

Yet no high school textbook calls these countries the aggressors or the bad guys.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sigh, I already said it's not about "white guilt".

[–]negrogreBeing black is anti-white 0 insightful - 1 fun0 insightful - 0 fun1 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

What you're saying is that they have the choice to leave without being condemned for some atrocity. Otherwise, someone could say the same kind of thing for whites.

Forget what happened hundreds of years of ago and either forcibly separate or move back to the reserves. I'm not against this. I'm saying, I WANT THIS.

It's much easier to blame external forces than to take responsibility for your own group's deficiencies, and that is compounded by being given everything.

They in fact, demand to get closer access to white people because they're deathly afraid of going back to savage.

They demand access to white people because they know white guilt lets Amerinds drink themselves to stupor and blacks stop crying racism for a short while. As we have seen last year, blacks are not afraid of going wild. Only the educated blacks who oppose 1619 and CRT are afraid of returning to savagery.

The only other solution is for a White Nationalist government to seize power and make segregation mandatory.

There's no way that that won't happen extralegally. And even then, that government would need allies to defend its right to exist. I just don't see that happening in any country with a representative democracy.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What you're saying is that they have the choice to leave without being condemned for some atrocity. Otherwise, someone could say the same kind of thing for whites.

If it was true for Whites, why is every white nationalist independence or separation movement condemned? White people are clearly fine with having new territory carved out for themselves, it's non-whites and jews who seem more opposed to this idea.

It's much easier to blame external forces than to take responsibility for your own group's deficiencies, and that is compounded by being given everything.

Not true, or else the Japanese would have all moved to America when their country was nuked during WW2. Races that have high IQ can clearly think past this mentality.

They demand access to white people because they know white guilt lets Amerinds drink themselves to stupor and blacks stop crying racism for a short while. As we have seen last year, blacks are not afraid of going wild. Only the educated blacks who oppose 1619 and CRT are afraid of returning to savagery.

Blacks literally leave their own countries by the millions for White ones. The African slave traders who sold their own people have also never requested that they come back to their own continent. Their conscious was always aware that they are savages on the inside but they are too scared to admit it. The Indians don't fall far from this. All their reserves look like warzones propped up by wooden shanties. But even with the millions in free aid the government gives them, they spend it all on getting closer to White civilization.

There's no way that that won't happen extralegally. And even then, that government would need allies to defend its right to exist. I just don't see that happening in any country with a representative democracy.

Oh, I agree it wont happen "legally". But it's absolutely still going to happen when all other options are exhausted. Assuming the last population of Whites on this Earth don't want to go extinct, they will disregard what international opinion thinks about them and go about creating their own country.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

indians should have built a wall

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Canadians should feel bad, but for the present state of their country.