https://unherd.com/2022/03/the-truth-about-ukraines-nazi-militias/ Some relevant sections from a recent article -

Instead, the threat is to the future stability of the Ukrainian state itself, as Amnesty and Human Rights Watch have long warned. While they may be useful now, in the event of the decapitation or evacuation of Ukraine’s liberal government from Kyiv, perhaps to Poland or Lviv, or more likely, in the event of Zelenskyy being forced by events to sign a peace deal surrendering Ukrainian territory, groups like Azov may find a golden opportunity to challenge what remains of the state and consolidate their own power bases, even if only locally.

Senior Azov figures have been explicit, over the course of years, in stating that Ukraine has unique potential as a springboard for the “reconquest” of Europe from liberals, homosexuals and immigrants. While their broader contintental ambitions may have a very doubtful chance of success, a broken, impoverished and angry postwar Ukraine, or worse, a Ukraine suffering years of bombardment and occupation with large areas outside central government control, would surely be a fertile breeding ground for a form of extreme Right-wing militancy not seen in Europe for many decades.

Right now, Ukraine and Zelenskyy may well need the military capabilities and ideological zeal of nationalist and extreme Right-wing militias simply to fight and win their battle for national survival. But when the war ends, both Zelenskyy and his Western backers must be very careful to ensure that they have not empowered groups whose goals are in direct conflict with the liberal-democratic norms they both pledge adherence to. Arming and funding Azov, Tradition and Order and Karpatska Sich may well be one of the hard choices forced by war, but disarming them must surely be a priority when the war ends.

As we have seen in Syria, there is nothing that radicalises a civilian population more than dispossession, bombing and bombardment. Just as in Syria, there is surely a danger that temporarily empowering extremist factions for their military utility, even indirectly, may have grave and unintended consequences.

If the European movement wasn't so disorganized and filled with petty nation-statism this is what would be the goal for Ukraine but of course it is not just a lack of organization but there is also a lack of revolutionary will to organize for. There is no better nation right now to become the base of new European movement than Ukraine. Their poverty, wars, and struggle has made them strong. Their place against geopolitical rival Russia has allowed both Ukraine government and globohomo to allow the arming of radical rightwing militias that no other European nation could ever have.

Communists took advantage of the chaos caused by war to seize power in many nations a century ago. They were a minority but they had organization and revolutionary will, why cant revolutionary nationalists do the same? That is what should be desired right now instead of cheering for Russian Eurasianism and calling Ukrainian nationalists cucks for fighting for their nation.