All love is valid!

submitted by FediNetizen from i.imgur.com

all 13 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–][deleted]  (5 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted]  (4 children)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted]  (3 children)

      [deleted]

        [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

        You can't just eat any old supermarket pussy raw though, that's how you get diseases. You need sushi grade pussy.

        [–]jet199 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

        At least include one sexual straight thing to make it fair.

        As though men and women don't get down and dirty and call it "making love".

        [–]FediNetizen[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        Actually, you caught the real joke. This meme is just bait for the conservatives to upvote without realizing you could describe casual straight sex in exactly the same way.

        Pressing the "insightful" button and actually meaning it for once.

        [–]madcow-5 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

        Ackchyally..

        [–][deleted]  (4 children)

        [removed]

          [–]FediNetizen[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          On any other website I would think this is satire.

          [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          Be a good servant to me in this life and I will reward you in the next.

          [–]madcow-5 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

          I do think homosexuality amongst men is more sexual than it is love / romance. If you look at fidelity statistics it's something stupid like 50% of gay marriages are polygamous.

          There's no such thing as a loving couple that's polygamous. When it happens among straight couples, it's usually abusive, like a cult leader providing for women who have nowhere else to turn, or a soyboy who's been convinced it's sexist for them not to let other guys bone their girlfriend. If it's not abusive, then it's not a loving relationship, rather a fuckbuddy situation.

          All that said, I don't really have anything against homosexuality, I just think society is looking at it through a warped lens.

          [–][deleted]  (2 children)

          [deleted]

            [–]madcow-5 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

            I half agree.

            If a guy loves a woman, he's not going to be interested in other women. As far as the physical urge being there, yeah it's always there to some extent, but sex with the person you love is 1000x better than casual sex. You could argue this is men kept from promiscuity because of women, but I don't think that's relevant. By that same logic, women who don't cheat in relationships only don't cheat because it will ruin the relationship, therefor men keep women from being promiscuous.

            Also, personally, I'd be less concerned about a woman I'm with sleeping with another woman than a man, but it's not something I'd be okay with.

            As for the promiscuous behavior in general, yeah it's mostly men, and men will be promiscuous if they're not in a relationship with someone they care about it. But that's my point. These relationships seem more on par with casual sex partners / fuck buddies than a real marriage.

            [–]FediNetizen[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

            Weird fetishes aside, there's no such thing as a loving heterosexual couple that's polygamous.

            You're even contradicting yourself here, bud. You can call it a "fetish", but there are polyamorous primates, like the Bonobos. It's not that surprising that some humans then aren't purely monogamous.

            [–]madcow-5 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

            What do polyamorous primates have to do with loving human couples though?

            Like, how do we know the polyamorous primates are in loving healthy relationships, and not in the same situation as human beings who engage in that sort of behavior?

            [–]FediNetizen[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

            Why do you think love necessitates some kind of exclusivity contract?

            [–]madcow-5 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            Because it does in every healthy human couple. It's not that I think either, I know.