Pro-Vax Bully Peter Hotez Implicated in Virus Engineering Program

submitted by iamonlyoneman from americafirstreport.com

all 7 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]IkeConn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I hope they catch and expose them all.

[–]CreditKnifeMan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

How can they modify a "virus" they haven't singularly isolated?

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Your question is based on a false premise.

[–]CreditKnifeMan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I assure you it is not.

When you decide to objectively look into the actual research. The original sources. Then we will be in agreement.

It's easy to dismiss what I'm saying, but that's how I know you haven't looked at the original sources.

Go look for yourself to prove me wrong.

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I have seen photomicrographs of sars-cov-2 so

[–]CreditKnifeMan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I have seen photomicrographs of sars-cov-2 so

You saw a photo of something, and someone told you it was something.

But when you go step by step through the virus "isolation" process, it's abundantly clear that they isolated nothing. Purified nothing.

No refined filtration. No separation of materials through centrifugal gradient bands.

Nothing that actually separated the materials of interest.

It's a chemically adulterated soup of cellular debris.

They'll inject this soup into another animal, and the animal will get sick, and they'll claim it's a virus that made it sick.

However, the exact same process has been performed on tissues that weren't allegedly infected with a virus, and the results are identical.

The results that are claimed to be "viruses" are actually artifacts of the process itself.