all 7 comments

[–]VimRazz 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Misleading thread title. In the second paragraph she's quoted as saying he shouldn't concede (that is: he shouldn't throw in the towel before all votes are counted), not that he shouldn't accept the final results.

[–]Canbot 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Oh, you mean she is saying that no matter how much of a landslide victory it is the mail in ballots are going to be so corrupt that it will swing any disparity back in his favor. Interesting.

[–]VimRazz 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, I said exactly what I meant.

While I wouldn't put it past Clinton's camp to try and meddle with results, I suspect it's more of matter of her being out of touch than anything else. The DNC still hasn't come to terms with why so many of us turned away from them in 2016, and they seem to be doubling down on the stupidity rather than making any substantial change to their approach this time around.

[–]scrubking 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

They want a communist Revolution (if the riots in the streets hadn't made that clear already).

[–]Klondike 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Nope. Hilary is a corporatist through and through.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't think you get it. Communism is not what it says on the brochure. Communism is a dictatorship with better PR.

[–]Klondike 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ok, my point was Hilary doesn't hand out communist brochures. Hers are pictures of Wall St that make it look like the Las Vegas strip.