Laura Loomer Blasts Republican Party Leadership for Being Hypocrites Who Are 'All Talk, No Action' on Censorship

submitted by scrubking from thegatewaypundit.com

all 34 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]thoughtcriminal 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

She's absolutely correct. The republicans have done nothing about it for 4 years and it's gotten to the point that I'm not sure it even matters anymore. The propaganda and bias is so strong that even if the Biden emails for example were not being censored, no one will believe them anyway.

We already have direct evidence Adam Schiff lied to the public about there being a connection between Trump and Russia. We already know Russiagate was a hoax. We already know Hunter/Biden did the same thing they impeached Trump for. None of it matters, facts don't matter anymore. It's a very dangerous game and we're all playing it. I'm not sure getting rid of the censorship will fix anything at this point. We've waited too long, we're in the midst of an information war and freedom is losing.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That's why it is upmost important that we vote for the Zionist Jew Loomer. /s

[–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

"Russiagate" was not a hoax.

"Facts don't matter anymore" indeed....

[–]kazenmusic 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (10 children)

Great report on a woman of astonishing character. More power to them all, it's a damn big machine but it would be fantastic if she prevails.

[–]Jesus 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Why? So, we can have another Zionist in power? She censored me the very moment I questioned one of her stances on Twitter. She is a Zionist stooge and heavily favors Israel the terror state.

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Not listening to you is not censoring you. Everyone else on the site can still see what you said.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, she outright banned me, and then a Hasbara account banned me from twitter. I tried to get back on and twitter IP blocked me.

[–]insta 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Great report on a woman of astonishing character.

You can support Loomer but let's not lie. This chick is a Muslim-obsessed nutcase.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Well, she does know Zionist Jewish Likudniks did 9/11, so, Loomer being an Ashkanazi Zionist Jew, knows she is outright lying about a false flag purim blamed on muslims to start a war for Israel.

Totally, pro-American. /s.

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Being banned from twitter is hardly notable at the moment.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Well Twitter is owned by a CIA asset and Zionist Jew Singer.

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

It's a literal pro-paedo site.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Is that what the PsyOp department told you? Human traffickers and pedo's are everywhere says Trump and "we are here to stop them." Dumbest PsyOp to date. They want you to focus on rabbit holes that don't exist.

Kick out Zionist blackmail mossad agents like Epstein and then maybe the US will care a little more.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's a pro-pedo site "shut it down" as the excuse we need to censor everything else.

[–]Jesus 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is pretty obvious at this point that Zionist Jews have subverted and hijacked the anti-censorship crowd. They use it as a melting pot to hide the fact that the real people who are being censored are those who expose Zionism and the 9/11 false flag orchestrated by ZioCons. Loomer is a Ashkenazi Zionist Jew and was a degenerate one before getting the needed money to campaign against another Zionist Jew in a heavily populated Jewish community.

Also, thegatewaypundit is Zionist owned.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Imagine thinking this Zionist Jew who has a long history of lying and censoring others who are against Zionism would actually be against, you know, lies.

[–]FediNetizen 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

They're "not doing anything" because they can't. Websites can delete whatever they like and give the boot to whoever they like. The government can't force a person (or company) to host views they don't agree with; that would be a textbook violation of the 1st Amendment.

If you aren't happy with websites like Reddit, Facebook, and Twitter, the solution is to use other websites.

[–]Velocity 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

If you aren't happy with websites like Reddit, Facebook, and Twitter, the solution is to use other websites.

From someone who despises Saidit's user base......yet here you are.

[–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

I'm not sure what the logic is supposed to be here. The fact that I dislike racists, alt-right chuds, and conspiracy theorists, means I'm supposed to like Facebook and Twitter? Is Saidit a website meant for racists and conspiracy theorists to you?

[–]Velocity 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

You know exactly what I mean. You squeal with delight when alternate and dissenting viewpoints get censored on establishment platforms. Yet, that's not enough in your diminutive mind. You insist on coming here to spread reddit tier establishment mind garbage all over the place. Yeah, dissenters from establishment opinion can go to other platforms, but here you are following them around like a lost puppy, looking for some purpose in your life that has devolved into heckling the "other"...where ever they go. You are accomplishing nothing but increasing other's resolve.

I dislike racists, alt-right chuds, and conspiracy theorists,

So brave, so stunning, so unique, so much self ascribed virtue! You dislike people your tunnel vision mind can't comprehend, preferring to slander them instead.

Are you increasing love, mutual understanding, and attempting to grasp other's concerns? No. The majority of people here have evolved beyond your simplistic juvenile understanding of reality. I would suggest that you do the same.

[–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

You squeal with delight when alternate and dissenting viewpoints get censored on establishment platforms.

I definitely don't do that. In fact if you read my comment history you can find a number of times where I complain about precisely that. You go on this entire rant, claiming to have me figured out, but completely missing the mark.

It seems like you're upset by the fact that I look down on people like you, so let me be clear. As long as you're not advocating for harm against others, I don't think you should be kicked off of a website. If you're a racist or anti-semite or something like that, I think a quarantine or "hide-by-default" option is fine.

That being said, your entire rant is based on nothing but your own delusions. Between this and your retarded-ass comments claiming that COVID-19 is about as deadly as the flu, you do seem like just another right-wing tard.

[–]Velocity 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

your retarded-ass comments claiming that COVID-19 is about as deadly as the flu, you do seem like just another right-wing tard

Imagine being such an isolated shut in that you go through my comment history to cherry pick a statement so you can have a contrived excuse to hurl an ad hominem. Most of us here know that when you emotionally react with slurs, that you are de facto admitting defeat.

It seems like you're upset by the fact that I look down on people like you

Gosh, thanks your Highness. Perhaps this is why you fail miserably at creating understanding. Like everyone else, you are just as much a peasant on the global economic plantation.

The Covid hysteria isn't a left/right issue. But, here you are spreading hatred, and division, not building bridges, and understanding. Go put your muzzle back on.

Like many here have noticed, your behaviour is strange. I can only guess that you are one of these options:1. A paid shill 2. Have been diagnosed with a mental disorder/on medication. 3. Are dealing with a pathological obsession displayed as an irrational, and intense hatred of the "Other". 4. You have convinced yourself that you are the one eye man in the land of the blind. Thinking that you are the smartest man on the site brings you a rare sense of feeling important in your otherwise impotent existence.

[–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Imagine being such an isolated shut in that you go through my comment history to cherry pick a statement so you can have a contrived excuse to hurl an ad hominem.

You spent more time writing this than I did looking at your comment history, so what exactly does that make you? Furthermore, this isn't cherrypicking; in the few minutes that I looked at your comment history, I saw a number of comments indicating the same position, this one just happens to be the one making a clear claim which is trivially easy to disprove. You can compare the 2018 flu season, which is considered the worst flu season we've had in the last 40 years, and which killed as many as 80,000 people, to COVID-19's impact.

Notice how one only caused a modest rise in the total death rate, and the other caused total deaths to absolutely skyrocket? Now note the date on the article, and note the date on your comment. The fact that you're still repeating a flu bro talking point in fucking August, combined with your apparent dislike of me, a guys who is obviously a lefty, is why I called you a right-wing tard.

You've affirmed multiple times that you think COVID-19 is way overblown and your claim that it's no more dangerous than the flu is consistent with that view. The example I mentioned isn't cherrypicking. Learn what words mean.

But, here you are spreading hatred, and division, not building bridges, and understanding.

Let me ask you something. Do you think you're the first right-winger I've tried debating with on here? Hell no. I've had plenty of conversations, but even when you give them direct links to the actual papers on the subject, it's like talking to a brick wall.

I tried pointing out to the racial realists that socioeconomics is an important factor, and I cited my sources with good papers like this one. The response I got that it was still all about race. I tried pointing out to the Trump-tards that HCQ wasn't working and most large studies showed it had no impact, citing my sources with the largest clinical trials of HCQ available.

At the same time, there are people on this site that I get along with even though some of their politics are different. Those chats work because neither of us are stubbornly holding some disproven falsehood as a core belief. If you think I'm "spreading hatred and division", it's probably because you spend too much time hanging out with either the racists, or the stubborn and/or ignorant users. And given that you believe that COVID-19 is no more dangerous than the flu, I'd say you're in good company.

[–]Velocity 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Yep, got any more of those mainstream trash"news" and "studies" for me that you have to mentally masturbate to because you can't articulate a coherent winning argument? Seen it all before and it's been debunked. Science is real, you are vapid. With you being the low Iq resident normie, it's what we expect.

[–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

can't articulate a coherent winning argument

Honestly, I didn't think my comment was that hard to understand. Maybe for you it was, though, who knows. Really ballsy to accuse me of being the low IQ one when you can't seem to make very basic connections, like "If there are over 200,000 people dead, then this has to be more dangerous than the flu".

You can tell yourself I'm stupid for following the science all you want, I guess. This is saidit, there are tons of creationists and conspiracy theorists alt-righters and other anti-science chuds on here, so you're in good company.

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/fw9htu/hydroxychloroquine_nyu_clinical_trials_placebo/

Not that it matters, since you have been pulled way off topic. And at some point, it's best to simply disengage.

(Edit:Changed link to non-participation link)

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I think establishment-lovers like you should have free access to sites, not quarantined, or whatever. You deserve to spread your lies elsewhere, just like others are free to meet them head on.

You are a good laugh, Federal-Net-Citizen. Gonna call me a "tard" of some kind?

[–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

When you're at the point where you're calling large clinical trials and the consensus of fields of hard science "lies", you're basically on the level of a creationist, and I'll repeat that as many times as you need to hear it.

Also, that's not what FediNetizen stands for, and I've said what it does stand for multiple times already. If you were smart, you could find one the relevant comment pretty quickly, so I'm guessing it will take you a while. To answer your question in short: Yes.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you for the subtle diss. Very good.

You can tell me I'm a creationist as much as you'd like, because its true (I can see your approval of me plummet lower, if that could even be possible). I do believe in a Creator, I just think it's silly to act like we can know anything about it without some radical change in our minds, which it seems no one has had, so their bunk is basically just bunk to me. You seemed closed off to pretty much everything except establishment narratives, so I'll just enjoy watching your fantasy and interacting with it.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Absolute cuckery. Every social media giant should be nationalized.

[–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Can't do that either.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Watch me cyka

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

As a publisher, yes, they have a right to censor anyone they please. As a platform that enjoys Section 230 protections, they are not allowed to do this. If they choose to control what is, and is not published, and to skew facts with erroneous 'fact checking' they are acting as an editor, and a publisher, and are responsible for the views being presented. This also included the liability for said views.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]SaidOverRed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    So we need a hundred more Laura's so we do get legislation.