"The Jogger"

submitted by Tarrock from media.consumeproduct.win

all 13 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Why not post something more reliable as a source (albeit also misleading):

https://www.ibtimes.sg/ahmaud-arbery-case-new-evidence-claims-arbery-often-pretended-be-jogger-while-committing-crime-56562

The argument that you see here is being used by defense attornies as:

New evidence presented in the case of the fatal shooting of Ahmaud Arbery by father-son duo Gregory and Travis McMichael

But it won't work. Believe it or not, it's illegal to pursue people in a truck and shoot then like you were hunting wild game. He was unarmed, hadn't stolen anything, was not tresspassing, was not in the process of stealing anything, but most of all: he had every right to be jogging outside, and did not deserve to be murdered whilst doing so. Think of this happening while you're jogging.

[–][deleted] 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I've seen the video. This "jogger" attacks them and attempts to take their firearm before forcing them to shoot in self defense. The nonsense you're spouting about hunting wild game is pure leftist propaganda.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

So if someone is threatening you with a gun, potentially to shoot you, and you try to take the gun, then it's your fault if the person shoots you? The person who brings the gun, and then manages to kill you, is definitely guilty. If you do this to any unarmed person, your claim that this is self defense is false, because you brought a gun, pointed it at the unarmed person, and threatened to murder him, implicitly or explicitly.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

If someone has stopped me and is armed, no way in hell am I going to try to jump them and take their firearm from them. Especially if they've called the police already. I would comply with their demands. Resisting in that situation is something only a dumb criminal ape would do.

Keep in mind, performing a citizens arrest is not illegal. Assaulting someone is. Amaud is the one that assaulted the two men attempting to perform a citizens arrest, and thus the two men will walk in this case. I assume you'll be joining the rioters and burning down the cities when that happens?

[–]wristaction 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The irony here is that socks was in another thread about the carjacking/murder in DC arguing in bad faith that the Uber Eats driver should have just relinquished his car.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If someone has stopped me and is armed, no way in hell am I going to try to jump them and take their firearm from them. Especially if they've called the police already. I would comply with their demands. Resisting in that situation is something only a dumb criminal ape would do.

Seriously? Look at the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-nKf0TW-L1M

Arbery saw men with guns trying to get him and once he turned the corner at the truck he was shot. WTF are you talking about. He fought with the guy with the gun AFTER he was shot. Then he was shot again. So you're saying - let the person shoot you - and then wait and see what happens. Makes absolutely no sense.

Amaud is the one that assaulted the two men attempting to perform a citizens arrest, and thus the two men will walk in this case.

This is insane. How could he assult someone if his first contact with them was to get shot. He also tried to avoid them.

[–]Feldheld 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

it's illegal to pursue people in a truck and shoot then like you were hunting wild game.

Of course thats illegal. Why do you mention this here? It has nothing to do with the case.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

"like" is the operative word in that sarcastic line

If you need to see this in legal terms: two armed white men pursued an unarmed person of colour supposedly in order to arrest him (per the attorney), shooting him upon his approach, and then shooting him again after a fight. Arbery tried to avoid them. The person with the shotgun is guilty of murder. It's on video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-nKf0TW-L1M

Hope this helps

[–]Feldheld 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

A NY Times video ...

So youre the typical fake news addict. What a surprise ...

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Are you implying that the video is fake?

[–]jykylsin2034 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Post the link

[–]SaidOverRed 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I'm sure that's what he looked like on his "jogs" too. Sigh

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

u/dcjogger