all 15 comments

[–]EternalSunset 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Teen getting married to a man that is going to provide for them: "Oh no the horror"
Teens going into nightclubs, using tinder, having an onlyfans, hooking up and getting pregnant while single, etc: "Slay queen!"

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Teen getting married to a man that is going to provide for them: "Oh no the horror"

I don't necessarily disagree with you on this. However, I must have seen hundreds of posts here specifically denouning the LGBT for being 'groomers', and it is somewhat amusing to see the same people defend literal grooming in a different context. Now you seem to at least realize that you object to the homosexuality not the grooming, so I'll give you points for logical consistency. I really just wanted to cause a bit of cognitive dissonance for people that can't manage even that, I personally could not give less of a fuck if some 16-17 year old wants to get married to an older man

[–]EternalSunset 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Most of the rage I have seem online against groomers is due to things such as parents taking literal toddlers to drag queen shows and primary school libraries having books talking about kinky sex and whatnot. To be clear I think those things would be objectionable even on a heterosexual setting.

I think post-puberty teens getting married at 15+ years of age, on the other hand, is perfectly normal and healthy. This has been the norm on most human societies around the world for thousands of years; your grandmother did it, her mother did it and the one before her did it too, etc... The idea of making sex illegal before 18 is purely a modern invention.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Most of the rage I have seem online against groomers is due to things such as parents taking literal toddlers to drag queen shows and primary school libraries having books talking about kinky sex and whatnot. To be clear I think those things would be objectionable even on a heterosexual setting.

Yes, I think that is the real objection as well and I agree, but this does not meet the definition of grooming, as that requires the indoctrinator being motivated by themselves having sex with the victim they are indoctrinating, what is happening is purely ideological indoctrination on an industrial scale that has nothing to do with grooming in most cases, but instilling woke values in young and impressionable kids. This is about social control and political power. What I object to is the rhetoric, because it's in bad faith and gets people holding contradictory beliefs, which erodes the principles people care about, and makes them easier to manipulate by politicians when they no longer even understand what principles they stand for

This has been the norm on most human societies around the world for thousands of years;

It absolutely has been, I believe in biological adulthood as well as biological gender

[–]EternalSunset 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yes, I think that is the real objection as well and I agree, but this does not meet the definition of grooming, as that requires the indoctrinator being motivated by themselves having sex with the victim they are indoctrinating, what is happening is purely ideological indoctrination on an industrial scale that has nothing to do with grooming in most cases, but instilling woke values in young and impressionable kids. This is about social control and political power. What I object to is the rhetoric

I disagree with you only on the point of this being purely ideological. Clearly there are a lot of more young people 'coming out' as gay or trans than there ever has been in previous generations and I think exposing children to deviant pornographic content like this is a part of the cause for this phenomenon. If all they wanted was to be accepted there would not be a need to expose little kids to pornography.

If you want an example of that, look at this article from an actual mainstream publication defending drag shows for kids by an author whose child came out as gay at age 9 and loves drag queen shows:
https://www.salon.com/2022/06/30/drag-queens-rupauls-drag-race-parenting/

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I disagree with you only on the point of this being purely ideological. Clearly there are a lot of more young people 'coming out' as gay or trans than there ever has been in previous generations and I think exposing children to deviant pornographic content like this is a part of the cause for this phenomenon. If all they wanted was to be accepted there would not be a need to expose little kids to pornography.

I see your point, and I won't deny it has this effect, it clearly does. But I do think the vast majority of people and parents that are supporting this do so because they want to raise a child that has tolerant values like them, and thinks people that don't have these values are morally bad and a threat to society/democracy what have you. Now among the trans activist community, yes there are definitely some sick fucks and I don;t doubt some have some sick motives, but I don't think this phenomenon is being driven by the 0.5% of sex crazed lunatics, its the well meaning but brainwashed liberals who think believe in this woke morality and treat it like a secular religion that everyone else must accept, cannot be questioned, and stone the sinners against it. I also think the politicians encourage this for reasons having to do with power, not because they want kids to be trannies. They have built a coalition of identity groups with a woke ideology that all defend each other and the interests of the DNC. Anyone who isn't a straight white man basically

[–]iamonlyoneman 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

More than a hundred in a couple of years, huh? Out of 400 million people? More people than that choked to death eating caterpillars. This is a sign the system to prevent this WORKS.

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Nearly all of those are of legal age everywhere else in the world. 🤣

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Nearly all of those are of legal age everywhere else in the world. 🤣

So you'd be OK with the LGBT's grooming high schoolers too? I mean its legal age everywhere else right? Or do you only approve of some groomers but not others?

[–]EternalSunset 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not canbot, but personally I wouldn't be OK with LBGT grooming even a 40 years old. Homosexuality is degenerate and shouldn't be promoted or encouraged at all.

[–]1Icemonkey 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Or your White daughter can hook up with a nigger and be raped daily. All sex with niggers is rape.

[–]quantum-step 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

How many of those teen girls wed to older men were to Muslim immigrants?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Probably very few, none of the states with the highest rates of teen marriage cross reference to states with high muslim populations.

Top 10 Child Marriage States According to Article:

Nevada, Idaho, Arkansas, Kentucky, Oklahoma, Wyoming, Utah, Alabama, West Virginia, Mississippi.

These are states with high black and white populations

Top 10 Muslim States https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/muslim-population-by-state

Illinois, Virginia, New York, New Jersey, Texas, Michigan, Florida, Delaware, California, Pennsylvania

Not a single crossover in the top 10 Muslim/Child Marriage States, there doesn't seem to be any correlation at all

[–]quantum-step 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So there's no way a Muslim or Muslim convert could of moved and not reported it, but still reported being married to skim government benifits? LoL. Sure glownigger. Rag heads have been raping children they marry for hundreds of years. Just cuz you do it, or support it, doesn't mean they aren't the ones raping kids and lying about it.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So there's no way a Muslim or Muslim convert could of moved and not reported it

Thats not what I said, I don't like muslims, but what I said it is extremely unlikely that you can blame this solely on muslims based on the data