Apparently it's bias to ask why she keeps holding her bump.

submitted by jet199 from imgur.com

all 42 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]sproketboy 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (10 children)

Barren whore.

[–]jet199[S] 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

She just wants to keep her figure.

The worry is whether they are paying some poor woman with no other choices to have the baby while they sit in their chicken coop living authentically.

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Probably

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

There's no evidence, Airbus. This is meant to sell tabloids to racist assholes who - like you - will think it's plausible, but there's absolutely no evidence.

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Ok socks

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Who is worried? This is photoshopped nonsense meant to support an obvious racist agenda. There is absolutely no other reason to lie - and these are definitely lies - about Meghan's pregnancies. UK tabloids have done this in order to appeal to their racist audiences.

[–]Comatoast 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

You're aware that they do this sort of thing with celebrity pregnancies in general, right? I don't see racism in it, just something to create scandal and more clicks/tabloid purchases. It's just really weird that you're attacking her for posting something in an assumption that it's race-related at all when she hasn't even mentioned it. I see why you would go after people for not having reasonably valid sources for your standards, but damn. Come on, socks.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

No - I've seen no evidence of this being the norm for celebrity pregnancies.

What I have seen - as I see the UK news daily - are constant attacks with disinformation and misinformation against Meghan. Not that I have any interest in Meghan, but the only type of post on Saidit that tends to bother me is the racist post. I've seen that image before and I know it's photoshopped. There is an original that does not have the baby bump on her leg. I also don't care for the Meghan and Harry interview, but the one good outcome from that interview - in my view - is that the much of the UK public and royal family now have a bit more information on how others see their lack of concern for obvious racism against a member of the royal family, whereas Prince Andrew was made entirely off limits for the tabloids. If the Queen could do this for Andrew, she could do it for her grand-daughter in law. Good on Meghan & Harry for exposing some of the racist treatment in the royal family. As for the UK tabloids, one doesn't have to look for long before finding plenty of evidence of a racist campaign against Meghan, in order to sell news media.

[–]Comatoast 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

She's American, she's mixed, and she's got an extremely plentiful amount of dirt going on with her family. All of her family members wanted to talk shit to get cash.

Maybe they don't acknowledge the pedo shit because they would have a target on their heads for doing so or there's some level of being paid off? I'm not sure, but I think it's probably similar to the underbelly of pedo shit going on in Hollywood here in the states.

Tabloid journalists are dirty as hell and will do whatever it takes to make money, but I almost wonder if a lot of this doesn't happen so that people can stay relevant in a world where no one should give a shit about them.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

OK - but ya lost me. I wouldn't want anyone to be attacked by tabloids unless they absolutely deserved it. What did Meghan do? Certainly nothing that has warranted that massive campaign against her. There are plenty of assholes to criticize. No need to go after the innocent.

[–]Comatoast 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Because they're tabloids, and aren't known for being kind or caring about anyone's privacy or personal space. They're vultures. Wasn't there an instance over 20 years ago where your princess was killed by tabloid journalists in some kind of car accident?

[–]bobbobbybob 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

that's hilarious. poor guy

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's Photoshoped, obviously.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (29 children)

Perhaps for /s/shittyphotoshop

No need to try so hard to be a racist cunt

[–]jet199[S] 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (10 children)

Stop projecting and go take your pills.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Not really how projecting works, especially for those of us annoyed by racist cunts.

[–]jet199[S] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (8 children)

You are a racist, that's what I mean.

You judge people and their actions by their race.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I didn't mention your race, nor did I say anything racist. (Perhaps it's sexist to call you a cunt, however.)

Got better response?

[–]jet199[S] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

You don't need to mention it. Hate drips off you.

I was referring to your reaction to Meghan, away.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You're either confused or really stupid, or perhaps a bit of both.

Referring to another person as a racist cunt is not itself racist, nor is it necessarily hateful. It's a normal reaction to a racist post.

And you must know I was not referring to Meghan.

Though perhaps referring to someone as a cunt is vagina-ist, or vulvist. I'll have to think about that one.

So, why are you a racist cunt? What's the point of it? Does it make you feel better? How?

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

You are a sexist tranny

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Does this turn you on, Airbus?

[–]skank 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

HEY ASSMONKEY AIRBUS320 YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT. HOWS THAT?

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

😤

[–]Comatoast 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

Wait, why do you think jet's post is racist? There's nothing about race on here.

[–]Airbus320 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Exactly

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Not to someone who's been in a coma.

[–]Comatoast 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Wat

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Exactly

[–]Airbus320 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

u/magnora7

[–]Airbus320 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

Demented faggot

[–]jet199[S] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

Nah, it's just Socks finally outed himself as Prince Harry.

He can't stand any criticism of the princess of his heart.

No wonder his takes are so disconnected from the real world.

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Yeah, I dislike meghan too. A drama Queen

[–]jet199[S] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

I don't mind her, she goes out and gets what she wants, but I'm not going to eat up obviously lies fed to me and pretend to like it.

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Reasonable

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

/u/magnora7

[–]skank 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

mr socks,

i spoke way too soon about you.. you are a complete horse's rectum.

watch your fucking language faggot.

you are mother fucking asswipe.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frCnHr1CmDg

[–]skank 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

SOCKS,

YOU BRING IT MOTHER FUCKER. I WILL FUCK YOU WITH A GOD DAMM FRUIT BASKET.

FUCKING FAGGOT CUNT.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

continue to isolate yourself, schizo; see what that's done for another user

[–]skank 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

SOCKS,

HEY, YOU LISTEN UP HERE CUNT..

YOUR INSULTS DONT DO A FUCKING THING TO ME.

I DONT GIVE A FLYING FUCK WHAT YOU DO OR DONT DO.

CUNT.

ISNT THAT WHAT YOU CALL JASON? (CUNT)?

CUNT.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Is all caps a form of yelling? Should I be scared? Leave me alone Ed.

[–]skank 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Good Morning Socks.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1L6sVi8_ZqE