SUMMARY

The technocratic community started a narrative where our earth will die soon due to global warming and CO2.
They have taken over a huge part of the scientific organisations.

Facts show that this narrative is false.

Many of us have been gaslighted into believing the narrative. Especially children.

So I go point by point to explain the problems in the narrative.

Background

I am a sane environmentalist.
I first believed that the earth was warming, until I almost froze to death in my own house.
Then I started to study the subject a bit more.

First I recognized that the solutions that were pushed, were no solutions at all.

With my background in physics and satellites, I noticed that the models were very parametrized. Which means that there were a lot of hidden variables and guessing involved. This meant that the science was not settled.

I also noticed that things were ignored, like clouds and forests.

But most of all: the influence of the Sun was ignored. Which is due to a historical failure and over-simplification in astronomy science.

THE GLOBAL WARMING NARRATIVE

Narrative level 1) The climate science is settled.

This is a total lie, as different climate models are still being developed. This does not only mean changing parameters, complicated dynamics, but also different factors.

Climate Models for the Layman with Dr. Judith Curry

The funny thing is that the ones that work best, are those that do not use CO2 in their models (Russian model).

Newer models are still being developed that also include the sun's activity.

So the models are showing the opposite of what the narrative is telling us.

But what this narrative did is horrible:
It blocked all valid criticism.
And this turned most of the climate science into bullshit.
Because now the scientists had to maintain the myth. So they keep claiming that that their models were settled and that all data is showing it.
To maintain the myth, the first frauds were showing soon. (first climate gate).

Narrative level 2) How can science be wrong?

a) Lie 1 - There is a huge majority that supports the narrative.

This is also a lie. The majority was fabricated by the technocracy who selected a small group of climate scientists that had papers with this result.

Maybe they did it, because they were concerned.

b) Lie 2 - Specialists / experts in climate science know best.

Similarly: All specialists in astrology confirm that astrology works.

Explanation: specialists in an area often create a group-think that confirms a positive belief in their topic.

Specialists also use the same tool and same logic over and over again.
Even if the circumstances or data change.
So specialists in such a fixed state, will likely produce errors.

Narrative level 3) The earth is getting warmer. The data is correct.

To my surprise I found out that this is not true at all.

a) The data was often cherry-picked and manipulated.
b) Of different measurements of the same area the hottest were selected.
c) Gaps in the data were filled in with hot spots.
d) Cold spots were turned into hot spots.
e) Historical data was changed.
f) False measurements that showed extreme heat were used.
g) The maps in the media and the maps published by NASA are continuously different.

Instead of gradual warming up, the climate is following the sun's cycles as a clock.

With the latest satellite data we also see other related myths disappear:

a) The sea-level is not rising.
NASA scientist explains with extreme accurate satellite data

b) Sea ice is not shrinking.

Narrative level 4) We only have a few years left.

With a few degrees warmer, the temperature will run out of control!

Well.. No.

Even the IPCC who started it is now denying this myth

Any physical system is usually stabilizing. The earth has already been hotter than today and cooled down, so it is stable towards a nice temperature.

The scientists studying the run-away model, found that there were some huge mathematical errors in it.

The idea of a run-away temperature comes from a bad and old model of the planet Venus. Venus is hot and has a lot of CO2 in the atmosphere, and the old idea is that this may work the same for Earth. That is why 100 years ago scientists started to worry about this happening.

On earth water is the most dominant greenhouse gas. So it works completely different, even if Venus is hot due to CO2.

Climate Sensitivity to CO2 is -0.02 Degrees Celsius

There is no Climate Emergency - signed by 500 scientists - pdf

Narrative level 5) Many natural factors don't matter.

a. Clouds

Yes clouds are neutral in the climate model. Yet we can see that clouds have a lot of influence to our weather. They can keep us warm or keep us cold. The hottest days are usually with a thin layer of clouds. And clouds in the night keep the night warm. But think layers of clouds can reflect the sun, and make days very cold.
Rain and snow also transport the cold in the higher atmosphere down to the surface. This can lower the surface temperature in degrees per minutes.

b. Sun

Yes, the climate scientists ignore the sun.

It is even worse: When the sun produces the most energy, the dominant climate model sees its influence as cooling. That is because the sun has slightly less ultraviolet light. But evidence shows that the total electromagnetic energy is much stronger at those times.

See Climate Forcing

c. Volcanoes

Volcanic activity can melt ice in arctic regions. And at those times panic breaks out under climate alarmists. That is because the models do not incorporate the volcanic activity. Even though Iceland and a lot of regions have hot water springs.

When a volcano spews smoke, the smoke can block a lot of the sun. With huge outbursts this can change the climate dramatically and cool the whole earth a few degrees. Yet, this is also not included in the model.

d. Jet-streams and ocean streams.

Jet streams dominate our weather completely. If the Jet stream comes from the arctic, the land gets the arctic temperatures. This can be very cold (yeti-stream) in the winter, or moderate in the summer. Note: the northern regions can become moderately warm due to continuous sunshine.

The same is when wind comes from the Sahara or other hot regions. The air becomes desert hot.

The hot and dry summer days in Europe were dominated by a jetstream directly from the Sahara. And the cold spring and wet summer in the US were dominated by the jetstream from the north. That is how simple it works.

The weather models look a bit at the jetstreams, but for some reason they are ignored when talking about the climate.

Additionally we have ocean streams that also transport heat and cold from other regions. They are more stable, but change a lot too.

The narrative climate model tries to model the ocean streams, but there is still a lot of discussion around it.

Note: the jet streams change clearly with the sun's activity.

Narrative Level 6) Human factors that don't matter:

a) Buildings - Ever been in a city during summer?

b) Airplanes - On 9/11 plane-traffic was grounded. This was also the most sunny day on Earth.

This clearly means that cloud-cover is increased by airplane traffic.

c) Deforestation -
The narrative model sees forests are seen as heating, because they have a lot of surface.
But have you ever been in a forest in summer? It is cool.
That is because the biochemical processes absorb this heat and turn it into wood and food.

The result is that governments are now cutting away healthy forests.
They use the wood to generate electricity, and this is called CO2 neutral.
Neutral my ass!

d) Agriculture -
Bare land, or fields of grain or wet rice fields are very different. They can have a huge influence on the temperature.

Above houses and above grain fields you can easily find hot spots of air.

Both deforestation and local agriculture can cause dramatic erosion.

e) Factories, power plants

Ever been in an industrial area with lots of heavy industry?

What about a continuous smoke in the area?

Or the cooling of a nuclear plant or the cooling of a cloud service.

f) Climate control

Besides your own building's air-conditioning and heating there is climate control on greater levels.

There are experiments with cloud seeding, cloud removal, and even cooling of the air. The extend of this is under discussion, and most of it is secret.

Narrative level 7) The CO2 is more dangerous than:

a) pesticides.
b) red tide.
c) smog / pollution.
d) nuclear waste.
e) acid rain.
f) oil slicks, fracking and cleaning.
g) water vapour.
h) fishing
i) hunting.

Narrative level 8) There are also many other bad side-effects to CO2.

See - Exposing Junk Climate Science

a) Acidity of ocean.
The acidity seems related to acid rain due to pollution, and due to agriculture.

The "bleaching of the coral" is caused by the age of the coral.
According to a specialist, they die after a certain age.

b) Hurricanes / Extreme weather.
As I stated above. The extreme weather is related to solar activity.
That is because the solar flares, which are 10-100 times bigger than earth, sometimes reach the earth itself.

c) Starving Ice-bears.
The polar bear hoax - Corbett report

Narrative 9) The west produces the most CO2.

Oh wait it is china and the third world.
(heavy industry)

QUESTIONABLE SOLUTIONS

If you still believe in CO2 being bad.. the technocratic organisations, push non-working solutions. I will keep it short..

1. CO2-credit, which allows big corps to continue regardless
   
2. Raise taxes
   
3. Nuclear energy.
   
4. Cut trees for energy.
   
5. Remove plastic straws
   
6. Stop eating meat
   
7. Geoengineering
   

The effect is that the real producers of CO2 will continue, while everyone else must suffer.
So, these solutions don't work!

Solutions that may work are solar and wind energy.
But they are very limited: no big industry can survive with solar and wind.

SOLUTIONS THAT ARE NOT TALKED ABOUT

IF CO2 is a problem, These solutions may actually work!

1. Plant trees.
   
2. Stop wars.
   
3. Reduce pentagon budget.
   
4. Stop or reduce pumping of oil, stop fracking.
   
5. Reduce space missions.
   
6. Reduce industry.
   
7. Reduce transport.
   
8. More organic style agriculture / permaculture.
   

THE BIG MYTH - THERE IS NO AGENDA

The CO2 narrative even got supported by big investors, including oil-companies.

They clearly wanted a piece of the pie, whatever that pie is.

Main agenda goals:
1 - the control of all energy.
2 - the establishment of a world currency linked to energy (and CO2).
3 - the establishment of a (corrupt) world government for resources.

4 - Eugenics

How and why Big Oil conquered the world.
Corbett report - general discussion

A Century Of Climate Crisis

SOURCES

1000frollyPhD
Scientists talking about climate.

SuspiciousObservers
Science and climate news and some documentaries.

Corbett Report on climate
Goes into each part of the climate science.