all 4 comments

[–][deleted] 13 insightful - 5 fun13 insightful - 4 fun14 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Another racist with the non-white people are too dumb to figure out what sex is argument.

[–]newaccount85 12 insightful - 5 fun12 insightful - 4 fun13 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

i've heard this argument before. very disappointed in gays and lesbians not building up an archive of this. I've met muslim "scholars" who devoted their lives to this type of satanic bullshit. I call it a "paradigm attack". What she's saying is technically correct but its beyond stupid. Just like death is a social construct because we truly dont know what death is...doesnt mean death isnt "real"...or like saying "countries arent real because theyre social constructs".

The worst part of this is if you walk up to a slave talking about creating an uprising against white people and then this dumb bitch comes up to you and says, "ummm, sweety, race is a social construct and isnt real..like, what even is white? what even is black" Black slave: "umm, my skin, im literally in a plantation being beaten and raped..because of my race" constructivist: "ok, dont you think the PROPER solution is to deconstruct race and help people understand it's a social construct? LIKE, u stupid or something? They'll stop oppressing you when they realize there's only one race...the human race, like..whatEVAH"

This is the paradigm attack used on middle eastern gays: gays being hung, executed, murdered in the background muslim: "look, there's no such thing as gay within our culture. thats called cultural imperialism. before imperialism, we all got along fine! and there were no such thing as gays! (not true). This is a social construct only white people defined! (not true), we dont even have heterosexuality within our culture! we're so open minded..we're only attacking these people because theyre bringing these foreign ideas into our culture!" <-- then how do they know who to murder. ...idiots.

paradigm attacks are when you bring a way of thinking that NO ONE has accepted even though it's technically true and drags a conversation on to 600 hours of philosophical discussion thats useless. she's too low iq to see the nature of her rhetoric but it's what "intellectuals" use just to frustrate people asserting their humanity. It's to prevent the formation of consciousness of a group identity to create a community against the oppressors and pretend THEIR identity doesnt exist as well and make it invisible. "wadda ya mean you're black! wadda ya mean you're a woman! wadda ya mean you're gay?! lets get together and deconstruct all this!" ugh, demon.

paradigm attacks are usually almost exclusively used by corporate lawyers, especially to play around with the definitions of food as "social constructs" when corporations want to hire them to corrupt our laws to sell us garbage. This is how about 99% of your orange juice is artificial but they can say it's natural. Lawyer: "what ISSSSSSS orange juice? My client the orange juice corporation wants to say it's natural and what ISSSS the definition of natural? We take the orange juice, remove all the water (and 100% of the flavour) but the flavourless pulp is still there! and move it into trucks to a factory after we extract all the water because it weighs too much for shipment..and then store the pulp in tanks (just so we can legally call it orange juice), then we take artificial flavour packs and add them to the water BUT..BUT, we have the original pulp of the orange so it's 100% natural!". I mean, TECHNICALLY theyre right..but in a definition so empty of truth that its outside our culture. That same argument is used for mcdonalds "meat". Funny how theyre using it on women and gays now. Maybe they should hire those corporate orange juice/mcdonalds meat lawyers to help them out lol. "what ISSSSSS death? isnt it a social construct? Did he murder him? Or did he simply transform him into an angel and send him to heaven so how can you call him a criminal for transforming him into an angel? HMMMMM?" <-- i mean, if you were a christian this is technically correct but can you see how far you can take this garbage?

[–]censorshipment 4 insightful - 13 fun4 insightful - 12 fun5 insightful - 13 fun -  (1 child)

Blah blah blah. I wanna thump the tip of the libfem's nose while she's rambling. Has anyone ever thumped someone's nose during a conversation? Not in a cute/playful way... but in a shut-your-stupid-ass-up way?

[–]our_team_is_winning 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I liked this comment:

https://twitter.com/Chivie__/status/1379709922447929345

It's like these upper middle class university "educated" (programmed) white women have this combo superiority/self-loathing thing going on. They hate white people ("it's all our fault") and at the same time "we invented patriarchy" -- like no other group on earth had anything going on until your ancestors encountered them.