HomophobiaWho's the man in a gay relationship? Hm? Hm?!?!

submitted by [deleted] from i.imgur.com

all 12 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]strawberrycake 30 insightful - 1 fun30 insightful - 0 fun31 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I suppose that would be your interpretation of gay men if your only frame of reference is porn.

Also, to me this implies that ancient homophobic idea of a penetrated man being relegated to a non-man status. I’m sure that goth’s mind would explode learning that my more feminine boyfriend tops sometimes.

[–]JulienMayfair 24 insightful - 4 fun24 insightful - 3 fun25 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

. . . says an edgy Goth teenage incel.

[–]Neo_Shadow_LurkerPronouns: I/Don't/Care 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Oh my god...

'Top' and 'bottom' are sexual roles, not full fledged identities, nor should they be.

There's a lot, and I mean a lot, of masculine men who like to bottom but refrain from expressing said preference because of how 'LGBT' media and society in general conflates being a bottom as being less of a man.

Weren't these people supposed to be progressives? Why are they pushing such regressive discourse?

This and straight worship are two problems in the gay community which were only magnified by the woque, who have no interest in adressing them properly.

[–]Elvira95Viva la figa 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

For straight workship, do you mean gay wanting to imitate straight couples traditional roles?

[–]Neo_Shadow_LurkerPronouns: I/Don't/Care 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Nope, by that I mean gay men who shit on other gay men but chase after straight ones.

Also gay blogs do shit like this frequently.

This shit is dumb.

[–]Elvira95Viva la figa 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Going after hetero people is beyond stupid. This gays are driven by egos

[–]fuck_reddit 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wouldn’t you like to know?

[–]filbs111 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

I'm no expert, but practically it may have to do with who ate recently.

[–]MarkJeffersonTight defenses and we draw the line 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Heaven forbid they ask each other? Or maybe it's irrelevant because there's no top/bottom and they frot. Believe it or not, it's possible to determine things like sexual position preferences without dressing or acting like a gender stereotype.