all 7 comments

[–]spanishprofanity 19 insightful - 1 fun19 insightful - 0 fun20 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

This [redacted] and her [redacted] furry friends were harassing a gay man with Klinefelter syndrome & his business for daring to speak out against genderists for using his biological reality for their shitty arguments

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Of course they were.

[–]Datachost 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I know who you're talking about and just checked. Yikes. Making his suppliers scared of working with him isn't enough I guess, they're spamming his account with futa porn

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 11 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Indeed, as we all know, prospective mates really love it when they are called "bitches." Only "bitches" this twit is getting are at the end of s/heeit's (that's now my new contraction) arms.

[–][deleted] 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I was super confused after reading the tweet, because this was what showed up immediately below: https://imgur.com/a/QAx2GJn

I'm thinking, what does you claiming to be sexier than gay men have to do with gardening?

I guess at the end of the day, neither the Twitter user or the algorithm actually matters. Because it's just nonsense combined.