Transing ChildrenStonewall UK claims that 2-year-olds can "recognise their trans identity" according to "research"-- no citations provided

submitted by reluctant_commenter from twitter.com

all 8 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]MoutonelectriqueBland Straight ♀ 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Ah yeah, that idiot. I've sperged on this on ovarit but I am angry enough so here we go:

She’s pointed to male characters in books and said she looks like them

Yeah, fuck you. You can look like someone regardless of sex. I look like my dad, he's a man, I am very much a woman. Same hair- and eye colour. I know this mom is batshit and the kid is probably copying what mommy dearest wants to hear, but on its own, it's a stupid argument. Ron Perlman looks like a Maine Coon. Is Ron Perlman a Maine Coon now? Are all Maine Coons Ron Perlman? THIS IS ALL DUMB.

This is all stupid and I feel deeply sorry for the kid.

[–]CleverFoolOfEarth 5 insightful - 7 fun5 insightful - 6 fun6 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, all Maine Coons are Ron Perlman, lol.

[–][deleted] 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Young kids like to emulate people in their lives, especially parents and older siblings. A girl with an older brother might want to have the same haircut as him. It's 100% normal and does not mean the kid is trans.

What's happening here is that girl is told no, she can't have that haircut unless she's a boy, so then she'll say she's a boy. It's just plain child abuse and sick parents forcing their belief systems on their kids who don't even have the capability of understanding what's going on.

All the trans diagnosis on young kids are like this. Based on what hair cut they want or what toys they play with or what clothes they want to dress up in. It's 100% parents pushing regressive bullshit gender stereotypes on their kids and nothing at all to do with the kids being trans.

[–]CleverFoolOfEarth 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But of course, what meaning does proof have to a postmodernist?

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

2-year-olds think in "trans" terms because they think in gender terms: pink-is-for-girls/blue-is-for-boys, playing with dolls means you're a girl, playing with toy trucks means you're a boy, etc. They do that because THIS IS A CHILDISH WAY OF THINKING. Like believing in the Easter Bunny. Kind of cute when a wee tot does it... fucking DISTURBING when an adult does it. Because it's something that you're SUPPOSED TO GROW OUT OF. Not have grown-ups LOCK YOU INTO. So you'll never be ABLE to grow out of it... or grow up.

No wonder the trans-cult is so obsessed with little kids: they're the only ones who can truly buy the "gender is real, bio-sex isn't" party line-- because gender-indoctrination starts at birth, is perfectly-suited to immature/inexperienced minds... and THEY DON'T HAVE ANY IDEA WHAT SEX (in either sense of the word) EVEN IS YET.

[–]yousaythosethingsFind and Replace "gatekeeping" with "having boundaries" 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well said. It is a childish way of thinking. Children think putting on a dinosaur costume makes you a dinosaur, putting on a Santa suit makes you Santa, and putting on a dress makes you a girl.

Ordinarily, we would find an adult who thinks this way to be mentally challenged, and we would not allow them to set policy for Christ’s sake and demand the terms on how the rest of us are to think and live our lives.

[–]MarkJeffersonTight defenses and we draw the line 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I also think they 'crack the eggs' -shudder- of children(the younger the better) because then they can say, "See? People are born this way."

It's to tie gender identity with sexual orientation so they can use much the same arguments and exploit the same sentiments.

Anyway, apparently you're not allowed to say "groomer" anymore on Reddit and on Twitter. I'm sure this policy does not at all benefit the groomers, who don't exist /s

[–]automoderatorHuman-Exclusionary Radical Overlord[M] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

RIP Snappy, I AM THE NEW GOD!

Click below to view and/or archive snapshots:

If this comment is being added for sites which cannot be usefully archived - for example, video hosts or an existing archive site - please let the Moderators know by sending ModMail. REPLIES TO THIS COMMENT ARE NOT SEEN BY MODS

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this sub if you have any questions or concerns.