all 13 comments

[–]FlippyKing 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The part about a Christian school and a Christian teacher who "read a paper" and decided to stop using "mom" "dad" and "parents" shows how badly adults are trained into accepting responsibility or in their love of truth. One of the best exercises, not that we saw it as that, I did with my peers in college was to go through the NYTs science section each week and pick apart the bad assumptions in the articles about published papers in peer reviewed journals. Now, they right articles about preprints, so the errors will be greater. But, each paper is AT BEST a pointer at some truth, not "the" truth. What is true needs verification, reproducible and a whole host of things.

One who loves truth guards it jealously. We are not sluts for ideas, but we seek and cling to the truth. We don't toss aside our minds each time we read and article even if it seems plausible. That poor teacher, with no anchor holding it fast while the tides of bullshit come in and out. Those poor kids thinking the teacher was anchored in reality.

It took a generation raised on shitty ideas and taught no critical thinking to create teachers who fall for this, who then give rise to a generation that produces a teachers that aggressive about pushing this crap. These errors have been in the making for a very long time.

[–]hfxB0oyA 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is actually pretty spot on.

[–]StillLessons 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"We should take the time to help people see how nice-sounding programs are being used in the classroom to create little activists and put kids in danger."

The piece that drives me crazy. The weaponization of banal, self-evident statements to lure in naive two-dimensional thinkers. "Black Lives Matter". Absolutely true and undeniable, and absolute toxin in the hands of people who most definitely don't believe it but know its power as a tool to their own power. How do you reach well-intentioned people who refuse to examine the actions of pop-leaders (like pop-psychology) rather than their words? Ideas?

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

"Mega thread"

It's a bunch of tweets. 🤭 What a shitty platform to use.

[–]Chipit[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Oh well. I work with the tools that are available.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Post cards are available. They are better than Twitter.

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I’m thrilled someone nailed down the ideology.

[–]aaarrgh 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

'nice' nick you have...imagination ran out?

[–]aaarrgh 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

even the Bolsheviks, the real ones, were more moderate.

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Only once they gained power, they still used these guys before that.

See

https://imgur.com/a/Sw26fLv

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Uh, the Bolsheviks machine-gunned people like you in the streets. These are their descendants who don't use such readily identifiably villainous methods.

[–]StillLessons 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The current crew just haven't sufficiently beaten people down yet. They'll get to those methods. Give them time.