top 100 commentsshow all 114

[–]rdh2121 67 insightful - 2 fun67 insightful - 1 fun68 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

Subs are allowed to limit open discussion as long as they remove themselves from /s/all, which GC has done. I think this is a reasonable trade-off, since any post you find on the frontpage will be open to all points of view.

[–][deleted] 15 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

as long as they remove themselves from /s/all

And state on the sidebar that they remove opposing opinions even if they are high on the pyramid of debate.

[–]rdh2121 7 insightful - 9 fun7 insightful - 8 fun8 insightful - 9 fun -  (9 children)

Yeah, /s/pinkpillfeminism still hasn't done that even though I've reported them multiple times. :/

[–]Happy_face_caller 38 insightful - 13 fun38 insightful - 12 fun39 insightful - 13 fun -  (6 children)

You are reporting a sub because they don’t want your contribution? Lol but everyone else is identity nonsense lmao

[–]bald-janitor 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Go back to reddit pedo

[–]Happy_face_caller 7 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Awe I made a pedo mad.

Cry all day baby rapist. Here to stay

[–]catoboros 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Elon?

[–]rdh2121 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Nope, I'm reporting them because they're breaking the rules that ensure free and open discussion on Saidit.

[–]Yayme 35 insightful - 3 fun35 insightful - 2 fun36 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

So, lets imagine your complaint in a real world scenario.

Imagine that I don't like the boy scouts. Maybe I'm super allergic to pollen, so I can't go in the woods, so I don't want anyone to go in the woods. Should the boy scouts let me in to their meetings, so I can stand there and argue with them about how bad the woods suck. And tell them they're unfair assholes, because since I can't go in to the woods, no one should.

Is that what you imagine freedom of speech means? Forcing audiences to listen?

You're the digital version of a protest group. It happens to women's meetings all the time. People sneak in, and then use a megaphone to disrupt the speaker because they don't like the ideas being discussed.

Your beliefs are not PRO free speech, your beliefs are ANTI free speech. You don't like what's being said, so you want to shut it down. You can't just leave us alone to say what we want within our private space. You need to come in with your megaphone and shout us down.

Just mute pinkpill feminism. Problem solved.

[–]rdh2121 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

How about this? If you see a comment you don't like, just ignore it, and then you won't be advocating for censorship like you're currently doing.

You can't just leave us alone to say what we want within our private space.

Because it's not a private space. It's a public space, by the design of this website that you've agreed to use of your own free will, and you will follow its rules, including the rule that if you're a useless circlejerk of censorship, you have to publicly state it.

Your beliefs are not PRO free speech, your beliefs are ANTI free speech. You don't like what's being said, so you want to shut it down. Instead of ignoring comments you don't like, you advocate for literal censorship, and then act like that's somehow exercising your right to free speech? Jesus, the mental gymnastics.

Luckily, the creators of this site don't share your delusions, and actual free speech advocates will always be here to report your censorship and lack of respect for the rules of this website.

In fact, I've just reported your pro-censorship sub again, just for the hell of it. I'm sure the admins will get around to forcing you to explicitly state your anti-free speech position on your sidebar soon enough.

[–]King_Brutus 7 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

You couldn't pay me to go to that sub

[–]Nemesis_Noire 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

thanks for letting me know this sub exists, subscribed immediately :)

[–]Yayme 61 insightful - 7 fun61 insightful - 6 fun62 insightful - 7 fun -  (1 child)

As has been said many times, it's not a debate sub.

Also, it's also a female only space. Which I gather gets your panties in a wad. Most men claim women need input from men to keep us from only have one viewpoint, or turning in to a hug box, or to broaden our perspective, or some such sexist idea that us women are a monolith, and we all think the same thing, and are incapable of disagreeing with each other. Eyeroll. If you lurk there you can see that's not the case at all.

If you went to a seddit for gay men, and started talking about how vaginas are da bomb, and sucking dicks is stupid, and if only these gay men would just try a vagina, they'd like it - do you think your presence would be welcome? People don't owe you a debate, and people like you, who feel entitled to a debate, are quite numerous and get very fucking tedious.

And Maybe the Gender Critical concepts are new to you, and you want to discuss and explore them. If that's the case, you can do that at https://saidit.net/s/gendercriticalguys. Or you can debate them at https://saidit.net/s/gcdebatesqt.

But honestly, your whole attitude adds to the toxicity of life in general right now - thinking that you need to "debate" everyone whose beliefs don't align perfectly with your beliefs and ideals. Are you really any different than a twitter mob trying to shout down others with death threats and hate speech? We're just a bunch of women who want to be left alone, and the very idea of that offends you.

[–]tuesday 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

very well said! @Yayme

[–]kwallio 57 insightful - 3 fun57 insightful - 2 fun58 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

GC is not a debate sub (on reddit they had GCdebatesQT and askradfem for debate) and they also have historically asked males not to post/banned males for posting so I'm thinking that you already knew this and were trying to get GC banned here.

[–][deleted] 22 insightful - 2 fun22 insightful - 1 fun23 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

GC didn't generally ban people for being male, but it was expected that they would not try to intrude in the conversation too much since it was supposed to be a female-centric space.

The sub /s/Gender_Critical was given to me by another user here and is in no way affiliated with the old r/GenderCritical, I wish that was made clearer in all these comments above. There is no unified "Gender*Critical". I complained about censorship of women on GC and the sub was given to me in the process so I tried to do something with it I thought was appropriate. But it has no affiliation with GC whatsoever, I've never been a mod at GC and while I like a lot of their content, I also disagree with some of it and feel their worldview is too rigid and limits thinking.

[–]Zodiac_Killer 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

What a pile of clamhurt degenerates.

[–]Yamyam 19 insightful - 7 fun19 insightful - 6 fun20 insightful - 7 fun -  (1 child)

No males are allowed. You can die mad

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

I could create as many accounts as I wanted. The post is to point out that you are idiots. You probably have plenty of trannies in your subs and on the sites you create anyway.

[–][deleted] 20 insightful - 4 fun20 insightful - 3 fun21 insightful - 4 fun -  (21 children)

Reddit might be dying, but the cancer that is killing Reddit is in the process of metastasizing over. These people are dense enough to still be oblivious how the hug boxes on Reddit, how identity politics has killed free debate. I do not care what gender you think I am. If you pretend to want to debate a certain topic, then I assume that you have the intention to debate it honestly.

You can have a debate forum about "Socialist Economics", for example, but that means that you would like to debate the positions socialists economists hold. It does not mean "Let's pretend socialists economists are right and then pretend we are debating their ideas." Then you might as well not debate the topic.

I do not want site staff to impose on people how to run their subs. That is another form of censorship. But I will ridicule these idiots for it. /That/ is what has been killing Reddit and people who come here just to port over the same mindset have not learned a damn thing. I do not care if you think I am male, transgender, or a dog. Contend with my damn arguments. And if you demand people already hold a particular position on a topic, then do not pretend you are trying to debate the topic. That is not the same as keeping people on topic. That is more akin to making a debate forum about cars but you are not allowed that different cars have different engines.

As for you, Catshit, you pretentious, disingenuous little piece of shit, do not act as if I was the weirdo for coming to your sub and assuming I can debate a subject that is completely on topic there. Jesus Christ, how I hate that pretentiousness, this smug bullshit that I thought I had left over in Reddit. How did you "make your way" onto saidit? I am kind of surprised by it. Not trying to be a dick. Just really curious and hope you are okay. Do you need something, like some hot chocolate milk, because that was a really weird thing you did there. Not trying to be mean, I just want to know how you thought people on saidit would not have a problem with this. Or maybe you can explain to us how this is any different from what has ruined Reddit, what is causing cancel culture, and why identity politics are rampant.

UPDATE: I have just received another message and I might have misinterpreted the intentions of Catshit. I am sorry if I have done them injustice. I thought they had been part of the staff. My criticism against G*C still stands and I still want to expose this. I will not remove the below. If I embarrassed myself with it, then I will be transparent with that, too.

Go fuck yourself, Catshit. Fuck GenderCritical, fuck censorship, fuck Reddit cancer, your little narcissistic feminist hugboxes, your constant belly aching about patriarchy and victimhood. Fuck you for constantly ruining these communities. You can take your gloating somewhere else, as if you have achieved some sort of victory for having removed me by force. You have no interest in freedom of speech. You are not opposed to censorship -- you just want to be the one doing the censoring.

[–]Humpty 46 insightful - 12 fun46 insightful - 11 fun47 insightful - 12 fun -  (0 children)

Go fuck yourself, Catshit. Fuck GenderCritical, fuck censorship, fuck Reddit cancer, your little narcissistic feminist hugboxes, your constant belly aching about patriarchy and victimhood.

Gee, I can't imagine why they banned you!

[–][deleted] 34 insightful - 5 fun34 insightful - 4 fun35 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

It was the transwomen furry brigade who banned people from reddit, not “Teh feminazis”. Why do you want to go on GC anyway? To act like a vengeful trans with an agenda to harass?

[–][deleted] 24 insightful - 2 fun24 insightful - 1 fun25 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You made some interesting points but you may have lost your audience when you lost your temper. No superiority here. I've lost my temper at times too.

If people want to put themselves in boxes, racial, political, sexual or otherwise, you won't be able to stop them. People love their boxes.

Instead, I suggest to you that you form your own sub where you can invite others to debate to their hearts content. Maybe call it DebateScrewtape. I think you'll be happier leading by example.

Cheers.

[–]Yamyam 18 insightful - 11 fun18 insightful - 10 fun19 insightful - 11 fun -  (1 child)

Here we see, a scrote having a breakdown

[–]Happy_face_doomer 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

😮

[–]windrunner 17 insightful - 3 fun17 insightful - 2 fun18 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Not trying to be a dick.

LOL. But you are being one. Maybe you should check your anger issues mate

[–]SavvyDiogenes 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Bro, you're a half-assed troll having a sissy fit that you were banned from a sub that respected all of saidit's rules (they took themselves out of s/all). You were banned because you're extremely annoying and salty. Chill the fuck out

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Shut the fuck up. None of what I said was trolling.

All your comments are half-assed bullshit, pages and pages of it and you call me half-assed? There is nothing of value in all that mental diarrhea you have authored so far.

I am going to be as angry and outspoken about people bringing Reddit bullshit over to saidit as I like.

[–]SavvyDiogenes 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Lol wow you need some anger management classes. sGC is following saidit's sitewide rules - if you don't like those rules then take that to magnora, not GC mods that behave within the constraints of saidit's policies. Going to GC to whine (btw you weren't banned just because you're male, you were banned because you have attitude problems and excessive anger) is like going to a LOTR fan page and talking about how much LOTR sucks - sure, it's free speech, but that's not the place to do that, Kenny - as you would be banned from the LOTR sub, thats how you'd also be banned from GC - GC doesn't enforce itself on other subs and call for bans which is why gc is not against free speech (as they don't enforce any ideology upon anyone, we just stay in our own spot and you're free to just fuck off). We don't disturb anyone - you are the one who is bothering others here.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The ban reason for G_C was that I was male.

The ban reason for GC, I did not look. I just told them to go fuck themselves at that point. I do not care about your armchair psychology, either. If you don't like it, go to Reddit. I'm on saidit for it not being like Reddit.

[–]SavvyDiogenes 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And if you don't like saidit's rules (which allow subs like g_c and GC to do this sort of stuff) then you're also free to fuck off. We're respecting saidit's rules, so we can stay on saidit. Simple.

[–][deleted] 12 insightful - 5 fun12 insightful - 4 fun13 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Well, don't leave 'em hanging Boss. The plot thickens...

https://imgur.com/a/3Z30Z8n

[–]Happy_face_caller 8 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 5 fun -  (6 children)

“Identity nonsense” is code for not being their default white and male lol.

Excludes everyone then cries about being excluded.

Haha. Stay salty

[–]AlphaPepe 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (6 children)

Not surprised TBH. They did the same shit on Reddit. Even if you completely agreed with them they'd check your post history and ban you for posting on T_D. Not before letting the entire group shame you first of course.

[–][deleted] 28 insightful - 3 fun28 insightful - 2 fun29 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

GC and similar subs get raided by angry incels and trans all the time. Extra caution is necessary.

[–]AlphaPepe 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Extra caution equals ban anyone I disagree with politically despite the fact we agree on the topic of the sub. Nice.

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I stay away from incel subs. I expect to be banned or downvoted from them.

[–]IrateBraceFace 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

What exactly did you gain from telling women "I agree, well done!“ when you knew well you have nothing else to offer to the discussion?

[–]AlphaPepe 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I've never been on the sub. But I've seen a lot of T_D users get banned on there.

when you knew well you have nothing else to offer to the discussion?

Yes because men don't have anything to say on the topic! How progressive of you!

[–]Wrencer 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's something some trans activists did

[–]zephyranthes 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (27 children)

What were you banned for?

[–][deleted] 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

What were you banned for?

You can see in the public mod logs!

/s/GenderCritical (mod log)

banned Screwtape (permanent: 2. This is Not A Debate Sub)

Several of Screwtape's comments were removed from this post, you can probably view the removed text on his user page where all his comments are listed.

/s/Gender_Critical (no affiliation to GC) (mod log)

banned Screwtape (permanent: male: Accounts that post here and are known to be male will have their ability to post here removed.)

mod comment regarding removal of the ability to post

[–]Wrencer 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

What's the difference between GenderCritical and Gender_Critical?

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

GenderCritical was made by refugees from /r/GenderCritical. I didn't like that I'd seen some unexpected stuff silently removed on /r/GenderCritical, and I said this publicly, and somebody made and offered me the sub /s/Gender_Critical, which I accepted. Now /s/Gender_Critical is a women's discussion sub for similar topics as /s/GenderCritical, but it tries to not enforce any particular ideology and to be more transparent about what content is censored. There is more information in the /s/Gender_Critical sidebar and in the announcement post.

[–]Wrencer 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

I think I will be interested in joining, not really a fan of some of the culture at GenderCritical atm.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Anyone female is welcome to comment and post, regardless of viewpoint or background! Please read the sidebar before posting, I know it's a bit long but I wanted the sub to have a constructive, cooperative atmosphere and that's why I made the rules the way I did. You can also look at the public mod log if you like to see how you think I'm doing at being transparent about what censorship takes place on the sub.

What do you find not quite to your taste at /s/ GC?

[–]Wrencer 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I posted a thread about AHS wanting to ban r/Radical_Feminists, and someone on here decided to post a link to my reddit's profile to discredit me basically (I have sympathy for the gender critical approach, but I'm not on board with everything honestly). A lot of women were condoning this childish behaviour, so I don't feel safe posting there anymore. Even if I disagree with some of their stuff, I literally never tried to "debate" or give my opinion, because it's not a debate sub, but if I respect their opinions, I want to be respected as well and I don't want my other profiles linked. They have a very narrow minded vision of the world, no nuances is allowed, that reminds me too much of reddit. They're mad at TRA for going through post history to find terfy stuff, but apparently it's okay if it's a GC girl lol

I have some criticizing towards the trans community, but I'm more interested in the "abolish gender stereotypes" part of GC tbh

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Interesting. I looked at the discussion in your AHS post, and I think you may also find the debate sub /s/GCdebatesQT to your taste, since it sounds like your current ideas tend towards somewhere between GC and TRA ideas.

[–]Wrencer 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, I'm kinda in between, and it seems to trigger some girls at GenderCritical a lot lol

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

also n.b. if you decide to post there, you don't necessarily have to use the s/GCdebatesQT "debate sub" for "debate," I think they will be happy with just discussing ideas too without it necessarily being combative.

[–]Wrencer 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you ! I don't mean to invade anyone's space btw. I'm not trying to push an agenda on GC ppl at all. I just feel sympathy for some GC ideas, and I'd love to have discussions on a friendlier GC sub.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (16 children)

On Gender_Critical, for being assumed to be male. On GenderCritical, I think for disagreeing with the oppression narrative of women.

I have been banned from Reddit for quite a bit of bullshit reasons, but even for Reddit, being banned for identity bullshit within five hours of having set up my account would have been a speed record. I cannot believe what gigantic hypocrites these people are. They complain about the way Reddit is going, but they are too damn dense to wrap their head around that this is completely consistent with their ideology, all the tranny nonsense that is going on there, the identity politics and how people are silenced for being in this or that group, for being factual arguments people with mod abilities just find offensive, not because they are wrong, how people just follow party lines, while pretending to honestly debate.

If this keeps on going, if there will be more "Reddit refugees" who were simply on the wrong side of the power dynamics, while being this clueless as to the root causes of the censorship, I would not be surprised if saidit went the same way. It's not a place I am going to invest any effort into. It will just go the same way the countless other free speech alternatives have gone: They always advertise with free speech, draw in users, a base, and once their position is secure enough they pull a bait and switch. Reddit was supposed to be about freedom of expression, debate and all that, so was Twitter, so was YouTube. Then, it's always the same type of pathetic little hypocrites who work their way up the chain of the admin and staff chain. Someone simps out, someone pulls a Five Guys, and then we have yet another bunch of little Napoleon psychos in charge. I am so fucking tired of it.

I don't want them to be forced to do anything, but if people who proclaim to have hated the way Reddit has gone don't pay attention to this and understand the dynamics of how the same sort of people keep practicing entryism then I am really lost for words. Collectivists and identitarians will just always take over a place then, and then we are shocked "How could this happen?" That way.

[–][deleted] 35 insightful - 3 fun35 insightful - 2 fun36 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Why does one sub matter so much? Trans extremists literally HUNT women down in online forums to silence us. There’s a post of the trans extremist manifesto on GC if you want to see their agenda. If the GC mods are extra cautious, who can blame them? GC posters didn’t ban half of Reddit— wacko (male) transwomen furry pedos did

[–][deleted] 25 insightful - 3 fun25 insightful - 2 fun26 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

On Gender_Critical, for being assumed to be male.

Just to clarify quickly, it wasn't an assumption, one of your comments stated that you were male. I linked it in my mod response to your comment that I removed on s/ G_C, viewable from the sub's public mod log for anyone interested.

[–]ChingChongdingdong 12 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Man, you're a lil bitch

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Fuck you, you simp. You're either a simp or a feminist. Fuck both.

[–]Crad 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

They removed your whole reddit account for visiting there?

[–]IrateBraceFace 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No. For debating his male viewpoint on a women-only sub.

[–]StBlops2cel_is_Lord 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Saidit will become Reddit 2.0, then we will all flee to voat (as if I haven't already, heh)

[–]Wrencer 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I left reddit to avoid the very black or white stance there about feminism/LGBT issues debates. Turns out we ain't allowed to debate on saidit either, and to be "moderate" and have "grey, in between" opinions. It's either "pick a side" or get mocked, or considered an "hypocrite" or "contradicting yourself". No place for nuances anymore on online forums. Echo chambers and digging up reddit drama are invading saidit. It's all about agreeing with the majority opinion or fucking off. We should be allowed to participate in spaces without having to 100% conform to said spaces' majority opinion. If you wanna do that and don't support contradiction, just open a fucking private groupchat and not an open forum on a free speech platform

[–]PencilPusher55 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

"Durrr reddit banned us! We need to go to a new platform that allows us to have free speech".

Enters saidit "Durrr this no debate sub! We ban people that don't share our thought process! Durrrr!".

[–]SavvyDiogenes 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

The saidit sub isn't even built by the original mods, you genius. They have their own site now - saidit GC is a community project, so to speak. We're not residents, we were temporary squatters at most.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

Well then, enjoy your stay while it lasts, you dumb pieces of shit. Is Ovarit up and running, yet? Or make some other penis free zone. When men want to have a space, it's invaded by women, when feminists want a space it's because people with penises are just so scary online.

You people and the tranny community are just as dumb. Maybe you fucking idiots are finally going to see the commonality in the identitarian bullshit that you feminists spearheaded. What a sweet irony. Identity and victimhood politics is great, until trannies use it, right?

[–]SavvyDiogenes 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

Bro this is so full of vitriol it's straight up funny. Take a break from the internet, you're really having a mental breakdown right now.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Go back to your penis free zone then. Different from GC, I can say whatever the hell I like here.

[–]SavvyDiogenes 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

As so can we, which seems to piss the everliving shit out of you. Deal with it or die mad about it,

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Not really. You're the one who needs a safe space. That space will be invaded and you do not know who has a penis in your user base. I already know several who do, BTW. XD

(There's also several trannies on your saidit and on ovarit.)

That's the thing with setting up an online community based around identity. It's stupid and I will keep telling you why it's stupid.

I will also keep getting mad about stupid people. I am fine with that. What now?

Have you collected crotch pictures of your user base, yet?

[–]SavvyDiogenes 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

And yet they stay there because they don't behave like a mental asylum runaway in the same way you do. Really disproves what you've said in this post in the first place.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Bro, bro, bro. You're such a savvy diogenes. It's straight up funny. Go fuck yourself. I will be as vitriolic as I please. I will be as angry as I please. Why? Because this isn't Reddit, you stupid piece of shit.

[–]SavvyDiogenes 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

And I'm free to laugh at you behaving like a petulant child. Free speech and all.

Once again, die mad about it.

[–]Rosefield 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You are retarded. Make a fucking debate sub then.

[–]PencilPusher55 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

O- Lololololol

[–]PencilPusher55 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Imagine believing in an ideology so weak that you cannot have it challenged.

[–]Rosefield 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Imagine being so fucking retarded that you don't understand the sentence "This is not a debate sub". If you want a debate sub then make one.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Reminder that Gender(_)Critical and feminists are trash. Fuck feminism and fuck your misandry.

[–]Rosefield 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Fuck off butthurt loser