all 15 comments

[–]Lugger 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

The article's name is quite misleading. It discusses the proposition to make Latin an official language of European Union, not Europe, and it makes all the difference in the world.

Personally, I don't give a single damn if English, Latin, German or Kinyarwanda is a common language of this globalist corrupt entity, and I don't see any reason to think otherwise:

Just like they did before, EU bureaucrats will carry on with pushing "anti-racist" education, importing hordes of Jamals and Mohammeds, silencing people who advocate for interests of the real (ethnic) Europeans by putting them behind the bars (a quick reminder that, unlike the Americans, Eurocucks don't even have basic liberties such as freedom of speech) and doing shitloads of other nasty globalist stuff.

In short, such trivial things as EU official language are completely unimportant because the institution itself is anti-European to the bone.

"At least we're speaking Latin as our countries are being flooded by Arabs, Africans and Asians amirite guys???? "

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Sounds like you actually didn't read the article. If you did you'd know that Hood -- probably the best DR writer we have -- has all the same criticsims of the EU you do and doesn't overlook them.

[–]Lugger 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Sounds like you actually didn't read the article.

Does it?

Straight from the beginning of the article:

... When I read the headline, I laughed. I stopped laughing as I read the article. Yes, Latin should be the official language of the European Union

However, the Turkish article mentions a French official named Sundar Ramanadane, who goes one better and says the EU’s common language should be Latin. Why? ... Mr. Ramanadane says there are other reasons why it should be Latin but he can’t think of any more. I can.

Yeah, a few paragraphs later Hood goes on to criticize the EU itself. So what?

It doesn't change the fact that he takes the proposition seriously and even lists a few arguments why it's important for EU to replace English with Latin. Oh, and did I forget to mention that he regularly equates European Union with Europe in his article?

If he knows the EU is crooked, why even bother discussing its petty and completely irrelevant policies like that one? Does he really think EU can be somehow magically subverted and turned into a pro-European force? Is he that deluded?

It doesn't matter how many bones (like language) EU masters want to throw to their dogs. It's still a corrupt bureaucracy that needs to be torn down so that Eurocucks could be freed from it's poisonous influence and start building good ol' independent countries. Hood makes it look like EU crooks are worth listening to and their ideas may be even beneficial to wypipo.

What can possibly go wrong?


Just run through the article again.

It would force Europe to build institutions like a pan-European army.

Nevermind. Mr. Hood turns out to be an advocate for a cucked cause of pan-Europeanism, which is basically a watered-down version of globalism.

Now it all makes sense.

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yea, he is a supporter of pan-Europeanism like all sane defenders of the West rather than thinking the future is to preserve the structure of Europe developed in the 19th century. He wants a European Imperium to replace the liberal EU. You obviously don't understand the issue with globalism if you compare that with a united Europe. Globalism is the destruction of Europe and its people.

Having a pan European Union goal was the norm among the European post WW2 far right.

[–]NeoRail 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

>muh freeze peach

Try exercising your "First Amendment Rights" in San Francisco or Detroit, then tell me how it goes. You cope too much.

[–]Lugger 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Try exercising your "First Amendment Rights"

your

Sorry pal, I'm not American so I can't even check if what you're implying is true.

But what I do know is that u can't get jailed in America for posting offensive jokes on Facebook or even discussing historical events — unlike Cuckrope :)

[–]NeoRail 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah you just get fired and hounded by anarchists instead lol.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's not entirely true. Nearly everything is illegal in the U.S., so they will find a way to prosecute you. This dissident faces 10 years in prison for posting memes.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost.com/2021/01/27/alt-right-twitter-troll-ricky-vaughn-busted-for-voter-disinformation/amp/

[–][deleted]  (4 children)

[deleted]

    [–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    Why would you think something as stupid as this? All Anglo cultures are the most cucked and anti white, it is literally the worst European language to have for a pro European Union.

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

      The greatest Germanics were the actual Germans, and unlike Anglos they didn't use their power to take Europe down a destructive path. Anglos represent everything wrong with the direction the West has gone, liberalism, hyper individuality, culture driven by money and profit, democratic party systems, anti authority as a virtue, and complete submissiveness to Jews. Germans had all the positives of Anglos without the negatives but it was the Anglos who helped destroy that German way and convert them to another Anglonized liberal nation.

      I am aware that English is wide spread today which is why needs to be combated. Anglo cultures are the worst in the West today and there is a correlation with how fluent a European nation is with English and how cucked they are. Speaking Latin isnt about being Italian, it is just a secondary language. Young people in Europe learn to speak English then they can learn to speak Latin instead.

      I am American, therefore a part of Anglo culture.

      [–][deleted]  (5 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        Nobody is larping as anything. You don't seem to understand this article if you even read it. The goal is a pro European Europe. One way to help develop that is to stop being submissive to Anglo American cultural dominance. If all European youth can be taught English in school and become a slave to American culture, why can they not replace English with Latin?

        [–]NeoRail 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

        I'd trade every single memory of "muh ancestors" for universal racial consciousness.

        Isn't this already the case as of now? It just so happens that this "universal racial consciousness" is the consciousness of a grey, materialistic mass of "liberal-democratic" consoomers who coincidentally happen to have traded every single memory of "muh ancestors" for McDonalds and Marvel movies. Implicitly, all of these people know how deep their cultural kinship goes, since they are all as vapid as each other and are completely intolerant to everyone that is not as vapid as them.

        [–][deleted]  (1 child)

        [deleted]

          [–]NeoRail 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          This is nonsensical because there is no racial consciousness in America. Even the redneck N bomb blasters honestly believe in brown oppression narratives if you ask them about it. So yeah, as said, I'd prefer racial consciousness, a will to a fascist order, over base ancestor worship.

          My point is that the term "racial consciousness" does not refer to any specific content. If we actually have to define the function of "racial consciousness", then it would be the shared cultural and psychological traits, opinions and loyalties within a population. This coincides with the liberal antiracist consumerist zeitgeist that is universal across the West. In fact, many third world nationalists argue against liberal and leftist ideas precisely on this basis - that they are foreign, "Western" and incompatible with any other people. When you said that you would "trade every single memory of 'muh ancestors'" for "universal racial consciousness" you separated the term from its content. What makes up a people, what are the characteristics of a people and what makes the cause of such a people worthwhile? The answer to all of these questions is intimately tied to "muh ancestors" because "muh ancestors" are the ones who contributed the creative spark and built civilisation in the first place.

          If people care more about Marvel movies than Roman art, maybe you should ask your ancestors why their art sucks shit.

          Is the point of great art to appeal to popular opinion? Rather than dismissing the skill of past artists, I think it would be more accurate to speak of a crisis in artistic taste today.

          [–][deleted]  (1 child)

          [removed]