According to TheDonald.win, the numbers of the election in Milwaukee are not following the Benford's Law. Is this a sign of fraud?

submitted by shakadevirgem from media.thedonald.win

all 11 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]conquestor 14 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Include that wikipedia immediately made edits trying to discredit Benford's Law. Our democracy is being murdered with the thunderous applause from the commies masquerading as liberals

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Democracy is a lie. I can't vote in in the chairmen of the FED.

[–]jet199 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

It's probably better certain jobs aren't filled via popularity contest.

[–]johnjohn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

yeah, like prostitutes.. you wanna pick those yourself.. at least i like to pick my own and dont really need my neighbors to vote for which one i am going to spend time with... but the president, we all get to vote for him..

hey, guess what? benfords law is bullshit.. we dont need no calculus or other high level math to figure out that there was massive vote fraud.

TRUMP 2020202020202020293R0293U2111111111111111111

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Jobs that have created permanent public debt?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I didn't see anything like that.

[–]SilverSlippers 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Even if it isn't, election fraud is a serious accusation and it should be investigated properly. I didn't vote for Donald, nor do I even like him, but if there is reasonable suspicion of a crime, it should be investigated.

[–]johnjohn 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

http://reddit.com/r/trump went private.

the senior moderator of /r/trump is a pakistani located in pakistan.

fk muslims.

[–]filbs111 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

depends what the actual distribution of the whole numbers (not just leading digit) looks like. The "Benford's Law" distribution for leading digits would be expected for distributions with uniformly distributed logarithm over some orders of magnitude. For more narrow distributions, it shouldn't hold.

In the event that these numbers are, say, the number of voters per geographic zone, and these zones are similar in number of total voters, and the voting habits in each zone don't vary a lot, it makes sense for the less popular candidates to more closely follow Benford's law, because the number of votes is smaller and proportionally more random. Errors add in quadrature etc.

Does anyone have the data that was used to produce this? I'd be interested to take a look!

[–]shakadevirgem[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Apparently it was released by the red elephants with other statistics. https://theredelephants.com/there-is-undeniable-mathematical-evidence-the-election-is-being-stolen/

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://github.com/cjph8914/2020_benfords/

The voting distribution that violates the Benfords law is following a normal distribution. This means that when the average of the normal distribution reaches around 500-700, then Benfords law gets violated as expected. The question is really why the voting distribution is a normal distribution in these counties. Fraud or natural?