BREAKING: 'Significant Discrepancies' Discovered In Arizona Audit, Ballots Off Up to 17.5%, 'Likely Joe Biden Did Not Win'

submitted by scrubking from nationalfile.com

all 63 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]zyxzevn 11 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 4 fun -  (8 children)

We already know that the election was stolen. Biden told us himself..

http://www.hereistheevidence.com

[–]ActuallyNot 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

That list is comedy gold! What a train wreck.

Have you clicked through any of the links?

The first one has the headline "Trump wins one of two Wisconsin Supreme Court Decisions". The part he lost was the decision. Because the case was meritless.

This was the case where Trump wanted to disqualify 221,000 ballots in Dane and Milwaukee counties:

170,140 - No written application (voters applied for absentee ballot online)
5,517 - Clerks filled in missing or misplaced witness address
28,395 - Declared themselves indefinitely confined
17,271 - Ballots turned in at Democracy at the Park in Madison

But not any votes from other counties despite having the same problems. Because he lost in Dane and Milwaukee. That was literally what he wanted.

[–]zyxzevn 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Personally I think dominion is the only one who voted.

[–]Sendnoodles 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Your opinion matters zero. What matters is facts. There are non that support fraud. That website is a joke. It's all anonymous and can added to by anyone. For all anyone knows, every submission could literally be one single person posting thousands of times.

[–]zyxzevn 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The fact is that Voting Machines are Fraud by definition in Hacking communities.
There is no way to check them, because data can be altered.
And there are many occurrences of data being altered.

I agree that the site is not the best, because it does not filter out the garbage.
It is more meant as a whistleblower site for further research.

[–]Sendnoodles 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

If that's true why did you never speak up before Trump lost?

[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You are just imagining facts again. Democrat?

[–]Iswearbymyfloralhat 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"Because the case was meritless" bullshit. ELection shills come on every thread. Thats not why the case wasnt heard. The game is rigged anyway, take your clotshot and pay your taxes. Just stop going to church and having a family.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

My thanks to /u/scrubking for letting me know of nationalfile.com, which is now nominated for /s/ShitpostNews, here

[–]TheJamesRocket 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (15 children)

This is wonderful news. We all knew the election was stolen.

But to have concrete, official confirmation of voting discrepencys in Arizona is major. That gives real legitimacy to the claims of a stolen election.

Let the investigators go through mores batchs and more pallets. If we see repeated instances of these discrepencys, then that is irrefutable proof of election fraud!

God damn, this is awesome.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

But to have concrete, official confirmation of voting discrepancies in Arizona is major. That gives real legitimacy to the claims of a stolen election.

Um ... I've got bad news for you about this audit. It's not official confirmation of anything. It's an opaque hack by people who aren't experts funded unkown people. There were two official audits, that were transparent and bi-partizan. And done by experts. They found no fraud. And the count was accepted by the senate, so there's no going back. Making this process not only illegitimate and disorderly, but also absolutely pointless.

[–]scrubking[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

No there wasn't you lying communist shill.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

Communist shill?

The trumpist wring of the GOP are the mouth-breathers doing this "audit", and the point is articles like this. We find 35 missing votes! That's 17% of the votes, because we're mining this otherwise pointless exercise for outrage.

Now Trump was the best ally the communists have had in a us leader since communism.

He overthrew the TPP for China. He did everything for Russia. He gave North Korea massive propaganda wins.

See? The communist shills are doing the audit. The funding that they won't disclose The source of could be Putin.

[–]RightousBob 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

Another "It's Russia! Russia did it! It's Russian propaganda!" Conspiracy theorist! You are batshit crazy! You know that?

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Read the Mueller Report, mate.

[–]RightousBob 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

That report has been debunked a thousand times over, mate.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Okay.

So those people that were charged and found guilty when they had their day in court, did any of them point out that the report was debunked as part of their defense?

Because it seems like you must think they missed a trick.

[–]RightousBob 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

Missed a trick? Ok bot. Who the fuck talks like that, mate?

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

People who speak English, mate.

Have you not heard the phrase "missed a trick"?

Let me look up that common English idiom for you.

What's your first language? Russian?

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

No u

[–]TheJamesRocket 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Um ... I've got bad news for you about this audit. It's not official confirmation of anything. It's an opaque hack by people who aren't experts funded unkown people.

Fine, prove it.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's well enough reported.

https://apnews.com/article/elections-election-2020-business-government-and-politics-arizona-a56ee7c8214ecc876424ee3428e3ab72

Performed by "cyber ninja" with no experience in audits, but experience in spreading the misinformation about election fraud. No Democrat observers. No press observers. Not clear what they're doing. No reporting of results as they progress.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Here's how Hillary Donnie can still win!

[–]Madsea 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Bullshit

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (32 children)

Whoa! Call the cops!

35 ballets were missing from a batch!

And 18 of the missing ones were already found in another batch!

Numbers like that are nearly 0.0005% of Biden's popular vote margin of 7,059,547 votes.

[–]TheJamesRocket 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

ActuallyNot is a shill account.

[–]Sendnoodles 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Everyone who disagrees with me and values facts over feelings is a shill!

[–]TheJamesRocket 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Oh look, its a shill defending another shill. How cute.

BTW, his account is 10 days old, and he was spouting nonsense.

[–]Sendnoodles 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

So you have nothing of substance say. I understand. If the best you can do is say "shill" then you've lost.

[–]TheJamesRocket 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So you have nothing of substance say.

Did you even look at the comment I was responding to? ActuallyNot was claiming that only 35 ballots were missing from one batch, and that 18 of them were found in another batch. That is complete, unadulterated bullshit.

There are VERY strict guidelines concerning the number of ballots that are stuffed into a batch: By regulations, there are supposed to be 200 ballot slips, no more, and no less. The fact that one batch had 35 less -and another box had 18 more- than specified by regulations is a red flag. These are strict procedures that were put into place long ago by government bureaucrats. In no way can you just handwave these kindof discrepencys away as a harmless mistake (as ActuallyNot tried to do).

The fact that you aren't willing to hold him to account over this misrepresentation (and indeed, that you rush to his defense) speaks volumes about your motives. And just like ActuallyNot, you seem to be totally opposed to the investigation and dismiss it as worthless from the outset. This indicates that you are a shill.

So you have nothing of substance say. I understand.

I don't think you do understand. You are either ignorant, or you are trying to obscure the truth of the matter. These kindof discrepencys are popping up very early in the Arizona investigation. If we're finding all these red flags now, what are we going to find by the time the investigation is finished? As they go through more batchs and pallets, there will undoubtedly be more discrepencys found.

If the best you can do is say "shill" then you've lost.

Lost what? The argument? Thats not up for you or anyone else to say.

The argument over election integrity will be settled by the Arizona investigation, not by commentors on Saidit.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

there are supposed to be 200 ballot slips, no more, and no less.

And literally two of them were out. By literally 35 and 18 votes respectively.

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

BTW, his account is 10 days old,

So everyone is a shill, because at one point everyone's account was 10 days old?

Or do you stop being a shill when your account gets to some age, and merely everyone was a shill?

Sensible people are trying to follow your logic.

and he was spouting nonsense.

Read the article. It's not nonsense. They are literally talking about 35 fucking votes.

In the letter, says Epshteyn on Steve Bannon’s podcast, it reveals, “Pallet five, batch 2976, 200 pink slip total, actual total 165. They are missing 35 ballots out of that batch.” He added, “35 out of 100 is 17.5%. 10 out of 200 is 5%.”

That's the argument. One batch was 35 votes out, so the total is likely to be 17.5% out. What a fucking mouth-breather.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Alright, James, where is the reliable evidence in posts from nationalfile.com ? There isn't any. A tweet, and comments on the tweet, do not constitute evidence. And if there were errors in some of the vote counting, there weren't sufficient for an appeal.

Rather than call people names, discuss the facts.

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

OOh! Namecalling!

That's high-brow! How will I every counter the rock-solid logic that takes established known axioms, and works through a series of logically sound arguments to reach the conclusion that I am a shill that is contained in the post: "ActuallyNot is a shill account."

It's just too sound an argument.

Did you read the article. The "Signficant Discrepancies" literally are 35 fucking votes. For fuck's sake mate, if you think that's significant, I'm not going to recommend you as a statistician.

[–]RightousBob 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Get's called out for shilling mainstream media talking points and cries like a baby. "Wah namecalling!"

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

When I joined saidit, they linked me to this image of the pyramid of debate.

It seems that you disagree with some point I've made that you call "mainstream media talking points".

What do you disagree with, and what is your evidence or argument that it is wrong?

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (19 children)

Welcome to Saidit. Good to see this rational response.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

Thanks, socks. It's nice to be here.

[–]RightousBob 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (17 children)

You two shitheads know one another?

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

Much like events in the world, you're not following your own fevered conspiracy theories.

If you practised holding a thought as well as holding your dick, you'd remember that your line is that I'm a bot.

You're not even focused enough to hold a conspiracy theory in your head. Finish wanking and then engage in the thread.

[–]RightousBob 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (15 children)

My line is whatever I want it to be and you've just outted yourself (and now by association socks) as a shill/paid operative. Thanks for confirming that, you bush league hack.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

Really.

You let go of your penis for long enough to gasp: "What I said before isn't what I want it to be!"

Wipe your keyboard off, and go outside. You're wasting good bandwidth.

[–]RightousBob 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

You're a fucking joke, you slop artist. I hope this is just a hobby for you 'cause you'd never make it as a real shill. Do you and Socks blow each other between shifts at the call center? Follow your flow chart you sub par, worthless excuse of a persona.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

I hope this is just a hobby for you 'cause you'd never make it as a real shill.

Oh my god. You can't hold a thought for 30 seconds. You must get an existential crisis every time you walk through a doorway.

The reminder is: You're dribbling on about me being a bot, not a shill, you blubbery drool-puddle.

[–]RightousBob 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

"Get an existential crisis?" Have an existential crisis. Do you say you "got a bad day at the call center today?" You've done it again Soy Boi. Nobody speaks like that, unless of course your are retarded, which is a prerequisite of becoming a shill. Your shitty contrived persona is leaking like a sieve, you wannabe keyboard warrior. Back to the call center pahjeet!

[–]mongre 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Boy oh boy the shills are out for this one.

Oh and Biden is a fraud. Trump won.

[–]Fiyanggu 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The November 2020 election was presented as a rejection of Trump, when it was actually the Deep State seizing power through vote tampering with the MSM mouthpieces covering for it.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And Obama was a lizard man who was born in Muslim Africa, and was an alien.