Black privilege

submitted by Rob3122 from u.smutty.horse

all 45 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]ShalomEveryoneCommunist Party 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (31 children)

Rittenhouse killed two white people, Simpkins did not kill anyone, let alone two white people. The reason why Rittenhouse's bail is so high is because white lives are valued and he took two white lives away. Also, the meme is lying (I'm not surprised), it has not been proven yet in a court of law Rittenhouse killed two white men in self defense. There's no comparison between Simpkins and Rittenhouse.

Shalom

✡️️

[–]Rob3122[S] 16 insightful - 5 fun16 insightful - 4 fun17 insightful - 5 fun -  (26 children)

Rittenhouse killed 2 worthless jews of which one was a pedophile(no surprise since he was a jew after all) and the other likes to beat on women. Kyle made the world a better place. Meanwhile simpkins(fitting name) chose to bring a gun to a school where he shot several kids and a teacher in the back.

You're right...there is no comparison.

[–]wendyokoopa1 14 insightful - 4 fun14 insightful - 3 fun15 insightful - 4 fun -  (16 children)

I have to agree with Rob and add that the us constitution basically states that should local, state and federal forms of law enforcement fail during times of crisis to protect a free and civilized society it is the duty of a free people to form an organized militia.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 5 fun -  (15 children)

No. Read the constitution:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.

Was the kid part of a well regulated miliia? (no)

Was he helping with the security of a free state? (no)

Does the law against murdering unarmed people infringe on his right to keep and bear arms? (no)

Are there videos of him actively pursuing people with the intent to potentially cause harm? (yes)

Was he instead supposed to stand in front of a person's business, to offer security for that business? (perhaps)

Did he do that? (no)

Could he have avoided pursuing and murdering people? (yes)

Is he guilty of manslaughter (1st, 2nd, or 3rd degree)? (yes)

Will that mean that he'll spend much time in jail? (no, perhaps 2 years for each charge = 4, and out on parole in 3)

Is he a hero for racists and gun lobbyists, who've sent him $500,000? (obviously)

Should others feel free to do what he did? (no)

Will they do what he did if he gets a lenient sentence? (perhaps)

Do you want to live in a society where you can be threatened by a person with a gun, though you are unarmed, and you are then murdered?

[–]Zapped 10 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

Actually, he was part of a militia. They were there to defend property owners against the riot mob. You may not understand the rules concerning how a militia can form and operate. Your statements on him pursuing the mob and not trying to avoid having to shoot people are flat out wrong using the video evidence available to everyone. I'm surprised because you are usually more careful with your facts here.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

Yes - they can call themselves whatever they'd like, and many of them remained next to the businesses they wanted to protect. I have no problem with that. It was NOT, however:

A well regulated Militia

This is the main problem. The kid thought he had immunity to walk around intimidating people. Even if he mistakenly killed 2 of them, it's still manslaughter, for which he should face justice for those deaths. He had the ability to stay with the so-called militia, next to the buildings, but did not.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

did you watchthe video, he was running away from the crazed mob, then knocked down, then shot them in self defense

[–]Zapped 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No offence, but you need to read up on what a militia is and not what your idea of what it is. In the U.S., a militia is a gathering, or group, of citizens whose goal is to be ready to be called upon in a time of need. They cannot be "organized" or have structure.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Excellent - let's consider primary and secondary sources for our underestanding of the second amendment, and its approach to "a well regulated militia" (a better version of an 'organized' militia). James Madison wrote that amendment, so that it would be possible for civilian forces to counteract potential tyrannical develoopements in the federal government. Anti-Federalists were worried at the time that the federal government had too much power because it also had a standing military (per the Constitutional Convention. Anti-Federalists wanted to limit the federal government's ability to violently oppress citizens. What Madison also wanted to protect against was mob rule and vigilantism, in addition to government oppression. By allowing for a potential REGULATED militia, he and congress developed one of the important aspects of government "checks and balances". For example, the increasingly militarized police forces, as well as armed vigilante mobs, are both to be avoided with the help of these checks and balances. Problem is: right-wing movements in D.C. and around the country are acively trying to DEREGULATE everything, so that the right-wing .1% and corporations legislate only for themselves while inciting violence among the 99%, with mobs of armed and unarmed groups arguing over basic facts (eg. basic human rights &c). Here's a secondary source.

[–]Zapped 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Cool read.

There is a difference between a regulated or organized militia, such as the National Guard, and an unregulated or unorganized militia, such as the group Kyle Rittenhouse was part of. Truth be told, all able bodied males between the ages of 17 and 45 are part of the unorganized militia.

[–]Zapped 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

Do you want to live in a society where you can be threatened by a person with a gun, though you are unarmed, and you are then murdered?

This is the statement that bothers me the most here. Are you willing to put yourself in the shoes of the three men who were shot? Are you making excuses for them because you identify with them? Do you think and act like they did? If not, stop apologizing for them. They were evil men. I haven't seen any evidence of you being evil.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (6 children)

Again - my note here is about the law, which is not a fluid concept in this case. It's very specific. It's not appropriate in any circumstance for an armed person to try to intimidate WITH A GUN an unarmed person, with the likelihood of murder. Not even cops are expected to do this, and thus carry tasers &c instead. This is definitely not an apology for anyone. It's obvious. It's the law.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Grosskreutz came at rittenhouse with a gun, that is why he got shot. the other used a skateboard as a weapon

[–]Zapped 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

And again, you are being way too kind in your opinions of those he shot and way too harsh on the kid. These men attacked a man who was open carrying and appeared to be there only to help the LAW ABIDING community. He and his friends spent the day cleaning up what the rioters and looters had damaged. Intimidating? Who was he hurting, even if was being intimidating? Are you condoning his murder at the hands of the rioters because he gave them a bad vibe? If I wear a shirt that says "Black/White/Asian Power" and it has a picture of a closed fist, does that give others the right to physically attack me because they felt intimidated?

One more question: have you seen the videos of the shootings? All three men were shot while they were attacking a man with a gun running away from them. One cornered him and attacked him with an unknown weapon to Rittenhouse while another rioter was shooting a pistol into the air. Two were attacking him while he was on the ground and trying to take his gun away. The last one put a pistol to his head but it misfired. So you're telling me they all felt intimidated at these points in the timeline? Ok, two questions.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I've seen the videos. It's obvious he could have avoided murdering two people.

[–]Zapped 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Take me through step-by-step, then. I'm reasonable and willing to change my mind.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Sorry - I have to log off in a moment (it's rather late were I am at the moment).

[–]ShalomEveryoneCommunist Party 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I always find it funny when you state your case point by point. When it comes time to provide a rebuttal, those who you are replying to either don't reply back or if they do they ignore what you said and try to argue a point you never made.

Shalom

✡️️

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

No, Rob, there are laws against murdering people in the US. Do you understand the difference between murder and not murdering? Seems you don't.

(Reported for promoting murder.)

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

self defense is ok and should be rewarded actually

[–]Rob3122[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Murder would imply those jewbags were simply minding their own business. They were chasing after him yelling "get him" and one of them assaulted kyle by hitting him in the head with a skateboard. Not to mention the one who tried to take his weapon while pointing a pistol at Kyle. But that's murder to you liberal fucks

[–]ShalomEveryoneCommunist Party 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Rittenhouse killed 2 worthless jews

All that matters is that they are white which is why his bail was set at $2,000,000. $1,000,000 per valuable white life.

You're right...there is no comparison.

Tell me something I did not already know.

Shalom

✡️️

[–]Rob3122[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Jews are not white no matter how much you scum try to be.

[–]Heterophobe4Life 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Pedophilia is a gentile disorder. Witness all the ped0 priests and the fact that Muslims worship a man who took a child bride.

[–]Rob3122[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Let's just skip over the the massive amounts of pedophilia amongst jews including rabbi's and their fetish of sucking on baby dicks. Whatever makes you feel better, jewbag

[–]Heterophobe4Life 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because it doesn't fucking exist. It's a lie made up by gentiles to cover up for their own systemic ritualized abuse of children. Goyim invented pedophilia specifically to rape Black and Jewish children to justify killing them when they lash out at their rapists. It is an inherently white and inherently gentile form of degeneracy.

[–]Feldheld 11 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

The self defense case is so obvious and clear cut that even the prosecutors case sounds like the defense case. It is an obvious show trial, and it's not Rittenhouse thats the target but white people in general. His only crime was being white while defending himself.

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

it's on video it was self defense everyone saw it

[–]wristaction 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

The Grosskreutz thing must have struck you viscerally. To think of never being able to force a cornered female employee to watch you masturbate ever again.

[–]Heterophobe4Life 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

No wonder Ricky Schroder gave him money to bail him out. Silver Spoons was made by the Jew Norman Lear and The Champ was made by the Homosexual Franco Zeffirelli.

[–]Heterophobe4Life 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

If Black privilege existed, all of Silver Spoons and 227 would be on DVD along with the first-run syndicated seasons of Webster.

[–]Rob3122[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

Oh look, another jew coming to the defense of blacks...shocker.

[–]Tiwaking 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Heterophobe4Life appears to be a satirical parody account.

[–]Airbus320 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Made by u/executehomophobes

[–]cisheteroscumNational Justice Party 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I knew I recognized this schizo haha

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

😯

[–]Rob3122[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, that appears to be the case.

[–]Heterophobe4Life 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh look, another yt parasite tries to rationalize the parasitic degeneracy of his entire race's existence … shocker.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

I think the black kid used self defense too as he was allegdely being bullied. That may be true or not. Either way though the bails were unequal. The teacher didn't need to get shot.

[–]American_ 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

It's not self defense leaving the situation, then coming back with a weapon. That's revenge. If the gun would have been on him and he shot the one person attacking him, that's self defense.

Once you leave the situation and there is no longer a threat, you don't need to defend yourself

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

is that what happened tho, he may have been bullied, attacked and assaulted, realized that carrying a gun would let him defend himself, then came back with a gun, then they tried to do the same bullying as usual so he used it in self defense. He can't leave the situation forever, he had to go back to school eventually. Again, this is alleged. With Rittenhouse it's clear on video so we know exactly what happened. There is video of Simpkins but it isn't clear, starts when the shots go out and it is just pointed at a desk.

I will never agree with your view on people should just run away from a threat, if someone is attacked it is ok to stand your ground and shoot them. If more do this criminals would become worried about outcomes and crime would decrease.

[–]Heterophobe4Life 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Said the racist.

[–]Zapped 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Word is that this kid was dealing drugs at school and got robbed and beat up. The shooting was his revenge. Hopefully, the truth will come out at trial.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

yeah hopefully truth will come out, if he was dealing drugs, what drugs, if weed that's ok.