Good reasons to go slow on abortion precedents (sub abortion with slavery)

submitted by jamesK_3rd from files.catbox.moe

all 5 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]jamesK_3rd[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I read this in the am and about fell out.

Ironically, my first though was, well I found the Democrat offended by this case..

As a fun exercise, replace the words

  • abortion with slavery..
  • Women with slaves
  • Abortions with freedom

There are a couple of spots that don't make sense, they refer to pregnancy etc, but sub the ideas, and it's fun times.

Sorry I don't have time to scan it or look online to get the actual text.

Ironically enough, he address Jim crow laws at the end, but it is how most academics were taught, even in the sciences. The best place to see this is in almost all the academic literature of the past 2 years, where the entire paper will refute efficacy of, masks vaccines or something else. But the final paragraphs, they say something like, "even though we show no statistical significance of cloth masks and no credible evidence masks work, the importance of continued masking cannot be stressed enough and warrants further research to find out the the efficacy of masking".

Everything is angled to get more research grants. What a sick world.

[–]IkeConn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Tens of thousands of children will be put up for adoption if Row v. Wade is reversed. The majority of abortions are performed on women of color. Who is going to pay for all these babies? Not the Republicans. They want to force women to have children but they are not interested in paying for them. Somebody is going to get stuck with the bill and the crime rate will increase or didn't you know abortions by women of color actually caused the crime rate to go down after Roe v. Wade.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

slavery was in place with laws that were race based

what should be done, allow abortion for black people only? That's not the solution. Crime is back up again while abortion is still legal because of not enforcing laws, letting criminals out with no bail, etc. The solution of course is reversing that. Then if/when crime increases again due to abortion being illegal, face that issue when it arises by increasing police presence, increasing jail time etc.

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Just in time.

https://www.drugtargetreview.com/news/84785/reversible-male-contraceptive-shows-promise-in-pre-clinical-studies/

Almost as if it's all coordinated.

[–]jamesK_3rd[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What inane nonsense. But you always know a Democrat, they're always the ones who believe it's the government who should solve all your problems and give you everything..

Regardless, the court is corrupt and they cherry picked this case as they can effectively redefine life as beginning at 15 weeks or so.. as such, they won't have to make an actual decision on RvW.

However, Abortion isn't a constitutional right. Contrary to your belief or your understanding, anything not expressly granted in the Constitution just means the feds shouldn't have purview over it, and it is left to the states. In this case, we would likely have 40 states with abortion on demand, and 10 or so red states where you can't sacrifice your child to Molech. In fact, It's likely we'd see several red states actually go blue because of this.

Beyond the technical issue of being completely ignorant of what our founding documents actually say, the substance of your argument is also nonsense.

Birth control exists. Condoms exist. A primary reason these groups don't take advantage of this is because the government provides for them while/for having children. Remove the incentives, and remove the ability kill your child when you realize you can't suck off the government teat and you will have a duck ton more people who discover condoms for 9.99 at Wal Mart.

Second, and most importantly, none of us get to decide someone else's future without due process. While you night want that to change, and it certainly will, it is still the bedrock of the foundation of this country.

There might be some criminals, but there might also be a Clarence Thomas. Neither you, nor I get to punish individuals for the sins of our parents, we aren't a socialist/communist/atheist society yet who punish by and for the collective good. Not yet anyway.