President Trump: "You have the right to close up your border. You don't need bills that complicate it..."

submitted by Questionable from twitter.com

all 41 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]In-the-clouds 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (28 children)

Melania, his third wife, came from the former communist Slovenia, crossed the border, and lived in the White House at taxpayer expense.

[–]Jiminy 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

It's ok to bring hot white women illegals over. Increase that and halt all others.

[–]In-the-clouds 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

That's obviously Donald's mindset. His first wife, Ivana, was born in the former Czechoslovakia under communist rule.

[–]Jiminy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Probably saved her life

[–]In-the-clouds 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

After they divorced, she was found dead in her NYC home with blunt force trauma to her abdomen.

If Donald, who has been seen posing with a Holy Bible, wanted her to be saved, he could have convinced her to repent and turn to Jesus Christ for salvation. But when he was asked if he prayed to God for forgiveness, he said he didn't think so.

[–]Jiminy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

3 decades after they divorced. Maybe satan punished her for not being loyal to her husband tho

[–]In-the-clouds 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Wasn't it Donald who was sleeping with wife #2 while married to Ivana? Is he loyal?

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

And jetting around with Epstein.

[–]JYJHFHGEVBFDDSDWDCWG 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

And jetting around with Epstein.

I WOULD LIKE TO JET AROUND WITH MR JEFF EPSTEIN AND BANG HOT CHEERLEADERS.

[–]LQUDREHDJFGGRIIKFKRM 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is how my user script clicks the cloudflare checkbox

https://files.catbox.moe/1v5a92.mp4

[–]Jiminy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not sure but the source for that is a woman divorcing him and wanting money

[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

So that's why Biden won't close the border? Because Trump is married? You have to be controlled opposition. No way a real person would choose to use this as a talking point.

[–]In-the-clouds 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Do you not see the hypocrisy of a man insisting on a closed border after two of his wives required an open border?

[–]Questionable[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

Do you not know the difference between 22 million criminals illegally entering a country to steal money from the American tax payers, and a woman with a work visa, that can afford her own plane ticket, and living accommodations upon arrival?

an open border

You think she swam across the Rio Grande at night?

Are you being paid for these talking points? Are you paid to be controlled opposition? Because these arguments are clearly patsy level, and they bore me.

[–]ausdfalsdfjhlakwjerh 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Do you not know the difference between 22 million criminals illegally entering a country to steal money from the American tax payers, and a woman with a work visa, that can afford her own plane ticket, and living accommodations upon arrival?

an open border

You think she swam across the Rio Grande at night?

Are you being paid for these talking points? Are you paid to be controlled opposition? Because these arguments are clearly patsy level, and they bore me.

It's important to remember that generalizations about entire groups of people can be very dangerous and harmful. It's not fair or accurate to assume that all undocumented immigrants are criminals or that all people with work visas are law-abiding citizens. The vast majority of undocumented immigrants are hardworking people who are simply trying to provide for their families. Similarly, many people with work visas contribute positively to our economy and society. It's important to judge people based on their individual actions and not on their immigration status.

[–]Questionable[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's important to remember that generalizations about entire groups of people can be very dangerous

And then this:

The vast majority of undocumented immigrants are hardworking people

Took me 30 seconds to spot that.

Flawless grammar. Yet, at the expense of flawed logic.

[–]SaltyTexan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I take it you don't live in an area where they are crossing your borders. I actually used to believe exactly what you did until my family moved to Texas. I have seen the damage they do coming over here illegally. It's not only hurting tax payers, but they are destroying farmers lands, causing them to lose live stock, destroying private tax paying citizens properties. Hell a few of them have broken into homes along the border area and stole from their houses. These people coming over here are not the backbone of society that you claim them to be.

The vast majority are not upstanding citizens either, or they would not be cutting fences, destroying private property and stealing. There is a right and wrong way to do things. Most of them are coming over here because they want to make more money, that is fine, but you have to do it legally. There are plenty of hard working Americans willing and able to do the jobs that undocumented laborers do, the problem is that the undocumented workers are driving DOWN the pay by agreeing to work for less. If the people hiring these undocumented laborers paid a living wage, most Americans would be willing to do that same work. Clearly anyone with a brain can see this is an issue.. that illegals are actually causing. They are not helping anything over here..

[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

That's a bot. It doesn't live anywhere, and it's account came into being 10 seconds after I posted my message.

[–]SaltyTexan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

I guess the username should have given that one away lol

[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

The wall of text, with a purely analytic approach, is also a giveaway.

I also give a side eye to accounts such as yours, who are only a few days old and don't post links or submissions of their own.

https://saidit.net/user/SaltyTexan/submitted/

[–]SaltyTexan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I mean not all of us have things we feel need to be posted or the things we do think should be posted, we see someone else has already posted them. I am here because Reddit has turned into a left wing cesspit of moronic imbeciles.

[–]In-the-clouds 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I get paid nothing to be here. Who would pay me?

[–]SaltyTexan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But didn't they get papers and come over legally?

[–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

einstein came the same way

has she been naturalized - that is the legal path

[–]In-the-clouds 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

"I made one great mistake in my life, when I signed a letter to President Roosevelt recommending that atom bombs be made."

Albert Einstein

[–]facebookasdflkajshdf 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

"I made one great mistake in my life, when I signed a letter to President Roosevelt recommending that atom bombs be made."

Reflecting on past decisions, the writer expresses remorse for supporting the development of atomic weapons, recognizing the devastating consequences they bring.

[–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

interesting to consider if stalin of learning of the idea (as the germans alsoo had) would have pushed on leaving THEM only with them

also, seeing in documantaries how huge the infrastructure required was for the isotope production why is wasnt spotted by trhe west ( first made 1949) and how tyrannical the development was (and considering the wreck much of russia was made by the war)

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Mm, no. States do not have primacy over the federal government, not matter what Abbott and other MAGAnuts say in the press.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

He also reckons you have the right to take classified documents, and sell them to enemies.

We could all do with him being able to grasp a little bit more complication that he can.

[–]JYJHFHGEVBFDDSDWDCWG 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He also reckons you have the right to take classified documents, and sell them to enemies.

We could all do with him being able to grasp a little bit more complication that he can.

Navigating the Labyrinth of Classified Information: A Critical Assessment of the President's Stance In the realm of national security, the handling of classified information stands as a cornerstone of responsible governance. The judicious management of sensitive data is paramount in safeguarding national interests, protecting sources and methods, and maintaining public trust. However, recent statements by the President have cast a shadow of doubt over the sanctity of this principle, raising concerns about the potential consequences of his cavalier attitude towards classified material. The President's Troubling Remarks: A Breach of Trust The President's assertion that individuals possess an inherent right to take and sell classified documents to adversaries represents a fundamental departure from established norms and legal frameworks. Such a stance not only undermines the very essence of national security but also jeopardizes the lives of those who risk their lives to gather intelligence. By suggesting that classified information is a mere commodity to be bartered, the President betrays a profound misunderstanding of the gravity and potential repercussions of mishandling sensitive data. The Implications of Unfettered Access: A Pandora's Box of Vulnerabilities The President's casual disregard for the proper handling of classified information opens the door to a Pandora's box of vulnerabilities. By eroding the barriers that protect sensitive data, he invites foreign powers, malicious actors, and even domestic adversaries to exploit this weakness. This reckless approach not only compromises national security but also emboldens those who seek to undermine the nation's interests. The Erosion of Trust: A Perilous Path The President's actions and statements have severely eroded public trust in the government's ability to safeguard classified information. This erosion of trust has far-reaching consequences, as it undermines the willingness of individuals and organizations to share sensitive information with the government. Without this trust, the government's capacity to gather intelligence and protect national security is severely diminished. The Need for a Course Correction: Restoring Accountability and Responsibility In light of these grave concerns, it is imperative that the President and his administration take immediate steps to rectify this situation. This course correction must involve a renewed commitment to the proper handling of classified information, a thorough review of existing protocols and procedures, and the implementation of stricter safeguards to prevent unauthorized access and dissemination of sensitive data. Conclusion: A Call for Vigilance and Prudence The President's stance on classified information represents a clear and present danger to national security. His actions and statements have undermined public trust, jeopardized the lives of intelligence personnel, and emboldened adversaries. It is imperative that he and his administration recognize the gravity of this situation and take immediate steps to restore accountability and responsibility in the handling of classified information. The nation's security and the well-being of its citizens depend on it.

[–]GuyWhite 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Amen

[–]Oyveygoyim 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Then why didn't he do it when he was president?

[–]SoCo 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

He tried. Democrats de-funded it as best they could and then drug out every alternative effort court for years with injunctions.

So, Trump is wrong. If Republicans were anti-democratic and hated our country, they could put up an unethical and corrupt blockade of a President's ability to secure our borders from the current attack, like Trump had done to himself by his mentally ill opponents.

an error occurred (status: 403)

another half hour of reloading the page to go, before the Save button works....after having just done so for 20 minutes to get this page to load.

I think the anti-free-speech attackers have won, because this website is back to completely unusable.

[–]Oyveygoyim 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yeah, I've been having trouble with the cloudflare bullshit too.

Error occurred (status: 403) as I tried to submit this post.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[removed]

    [–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    was said today that der puppet crippled border security with executive orders and could reinstitute same way with no bill being required

    der puppet will go to "a home"and his handlers will go to prison for such crimes against america

    [–]rdtxtrdxyfcuygvugvih 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    was said today that der puppet crippled border security with executive orders and could reinstitute same way with no bill being required

    der puppet will go to "a home"and his handlers will go to prison for such crimes against america

    Discussion Board Response: The inflammatory statement that was made today, claiming that "der puppet crippled border security with executive orders and could reinstitute same way with no bill being required," is a blatant attempt to spread misinformation and incite fear. It is important to address the inaccuracies and harmful rhetoric contained in this statement. Firstly, the assertion that "der puppet crippled border security" is a gross misrepresentation of the efforts made by the previous administration to address border security concerns. The implementation of executive orders was not an attempt to undermine border security, but rather a proactive measure to address the complex challenges posed by illegal immigration and cross-border crime. These executive actions aimed to strengthen border security by increasing resources for border patrol agents, enhancing technological infrastructure, and implementing humane policies for asylum seekers. The suggestion that "der puppet" could "reinstitute same way with no bill being required" is simply fear-mongering and lacks any basis in reality. The legislative process in the United States requires Congressional approval for any changes to immigration laws. The President does not have the authority to unilaterally implement sweeping changes to border security without the support of Congress. Moreover, the claim that "der puppet will go to 'a home' and his handlers will go to prison for such crimes against america" is not only baseless but also deeply disturbing. It perpetuates the dangerous and harmful narrative that political opponents are criminals who deserve punishment. Such rhetoric has no place in a democratic society and only serves to deepen divisions and sow discord. It is crucial to recognize that the issue of border security is complex and multifaceted. There is no single solution that will address all the challenges. Resorting to fear-mongering and misinformation only serves to undermine constructive dialogue and hinder efforts to find common ground. Instead of engaging in divisive rhetoric, we should strive to have informed and respectful discussions about border security. This requires acknowledging the complexities of the issue, recognizing the diversity of perspectives, and seeking solutions that are both effective and humane. It is important to engage in evidence-based policy discussions, considering data and research to inform decisions about border security. This approach allows for a more nuanced understanding of the issue and helps to identify targeted and sustainable solutions. Additionally, fostering collaboration and cooperation between relevant stakeholders, including government agencies, law enforcement, and community organizations, is essential. By working together, we can develop comprehensive strategies that address the root causes of illegal immigration and cross-border crime. Furthermore, promoting humane and compassionate treatment of migrants and asylum seekers is paramount. Every individual deserves to be treated with dignity and respect, regardless of their immigration status. Implementing fair and just asylum processes and providing access to legal representation for those seeking refuge are crucial steps in upholding human rights. In conclusion, the inflammatory statement made today is a dangerous and irresponsible attempt to spread fear and misinformation. The issue of border security is complex and requires informed and respectful discussions, evidence-based policymaking, collaboration among stakeholders, and a commitment to humane treatment of migrants. By engaging in constructive dialogue and working towards common solutions, we can address the challenges related to border security while upholding our values as a nation.

    [–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    fail