all 59 comments

[–]passionflounderPaper tiger 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Artificial consensus cannot be reasoned with.

[–]QuantumLegion 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

[china is literally objectively not communist]

Its literally their NAME!

The Chinese Communist Party, officially the Communist Party of China, is the founding and sole ruling party of the People's Republic of China.

I've heard this before on Reddit but damn....

[–]Hematomato 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Its literally their NAME!

The Chinese Communist Party, officially the Communist Party of China, is the founding and sole ruling party of the People's Republic of China.

The Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) is a country in East Asia...

[–]Ferretman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Well yeah, but their actions are pretty aligned with the Democratic Party, so....

[–]Tom_BombadilBombadildo 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You're arguing with a pharma shill. Hematomato.

[–]Lovebirds_fury 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (14 children)

What the fuck "going gay" even means. You can't change your sexuality. You can get surgeries and pretend to be the opposite sex, but you can't delude yourself into enjoying gay or straight sex if you arent genuinely into it. It's impossible.

All kinds of people write bullshit dating stories, not only gay people. Also there are plenty of gay men complaining about gay culture and how it's so difficult to find a boyfriend. How they are the only gay man in existence who wants a romantic relationship and the rest are sex addicted heartless monsters. Its a cliche at this point. Idk what you are talking about, nobody is painting the gay life as something perfect.

Never attribute to malice (or propaganda bots) that which is adequately explained by stupidity. There is no shortage of stupidity in every sexual orientation.

[–]ID10T 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

The only people who think being gay is a choice are gay or bisexual themselves.

I never think "ooh I'd love to suck a dick today but I choose not to". Just like gay dudes don't want anything to do with vagina. They think it's nasty. We're just wired different and that's ok.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Studies have shown that men will fuck a park bench when they get horny. But they can choose not to. Fucking park benches is a choice. Being gay is a choice. What turns you on is not, but perhaps it can be shaped.

In the same way you can acquire a taste for oysters, you can acquire a taste for dick if you get groomed the right way. That is why boys who get sexually abused are far more likely to become gay. h

The reason you have been taught that homosexuality is something you are born with is because the people who want more homosexuality rely on the ignorance of the public in order to get away with their homo agendas. The claim that it is genetic is completely debunked by the fact that identical twins do not always have identical sexualities. It is not genetic and it is not "conditions in the womb". Sexuality is created as you go through puberty.

That is why boys with older brothers are far more likely to be gay. Whey they are going through puberty next to a young male in their sexual prime and they are objectively attractive that young boy will become sexually aroused by it.

That is what the data shows. To understand it you have to stop thinking that your personal sexual desires describe everyone. You have to realize that in order to truly understand human sexuality you need to study it, and not just pull conclusions out of your ass based on a very shallow accounting of your own experience.

[–]ID10T 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

That's a lot of words to say you think about sucking cock all the time. Hey man don't be repressed. You got to be you!

Everything you said is completely bs. I hope you know that. There's no studies to support any points you made. Conversion therapy has never worked. Most gay kids knew they were different before they even thought about sex. Even the "I'm not gay no more" meme guy admitted that he's still gay. If you want to fuck dudes just accept it. Stop fighting your true self. It just leads to hate, hardship, and depression.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Conversion therapy has never worked.

This, more than anything, demonstrates that you did not understand what I wrote. Conversion therapy does not work because it is done long after sexuality is established and reinforced. The brain has taken it's shape and is no longer plastic.

Most gay kids knew they were different before they even thought about sex.

A lot of factors can add to this dubious assertion, not least of which is survivor bias. The kids who felt different but did not end up gay don't go around saying they were born different and that is why they are straight.

[–]ID10T 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

If you agree that conversion therapy doesn't work then you agree that being gay isn't a choice.

If it's not a choice for adults, then how is it a choice for kids who aren't even sexual yet? How are you going to get them to be straight? Nobody even knows why people are gay. The correlation between older brothers doesn't conclude with they turned gay because they got turned on by their brothers.

And the converse is not true for lesbians. There's no sibling correlation with women. So I'm curious why you seem so sure that it's a choice. That somehow you could change it. Many many people have tried to change gays to straight. Assuming that it doesn't work, can't you just accept that some people are gay and that's ok?

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you agree that conversion therapy doesn't work then you agree that being gay isn't a choice.

Wrong.

First off you can have a fucked up brain and still choose not to behave gay.

Second off, if the choice has to be made early in development it is still a choice.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

how is it a choice for kids who aren't even sexual yet?

Kids make choices all the time. They can choose to be more masculine. They can choose to gravitate towards masculine roll models. They can choose to focus on daydreaming about the opposite sex. They can choose activities that will encourage the proper brain development.

Obviously as kids they don't have control over everything. A lot of the choices are made for them by teachers, parents, and the media they consume. That is why kids should be protected from groomers.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Many many people have tried to change gays to straight

Too late to change someone who is already gay because they have already been programmed to be gay. You have to influence them before they become gay. And that is something that is done all the time by responsible fathers. There is a reason that homosexuality has skyrocketed along with LGBT propaganda and gay acceptance, and it is absolutely not true that it is just that gays are finally able to come out.

[–]ID10T 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There's no evidence for the idea that a person can be influenced to be gay.

I agree that children should be protected from groomers, sexual discussions at a young age. Most children have no idea what sex is before the age of 8 and I don't think anything good comes from discussing or telling children the ridiculous idea that they can choose their sex.

Sex ed should come at puberty to help children understand what changes are happening and how to navigate those new feelings safely. That doesn't include demonstrations on how to give blowjobs and shit. Just a general description of how sex works, how babies are made, how serious it is and how to be safe.

One of my best friends is gay and he has a great dad. His dad is very straight and never encouraged his son to be gay, but he does accept and love him, as any good father should.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That is why boys with older brothers are far more likely to be gay. Whey they are going through puberty next to a young male in their sexual prime and they are objectively attractive that young boy will become sexually aroused by it.

Umm... to the vast vast majority of everyone, fucking your own brother, whether he's objectively attractive or not, is unthinkable. Do you have something to tell us?

[–]blackpoop321 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

you can't delude yourself into enjoying gay or straight sex if you arent genuinely into it. It's impossible.

That's one of the earliest lie. Obviously it's false. "Sexual orientation" isn't a thing, non-straights are just perverts, you're not going to convince me that gays really just can't stand the sight of pussy, that they can only get it up with a male asshole somehow. That's ridiculous.

Gays are what happens when you tell generations of lonely straight men that depravity is okay, that they don't have to bother with the opposite sex. Shield a bunch of normal male teenagers from shame and bullying and they'll all jump on the first opportunity to fuck any butthole.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't think it is as simple as that, but in general you got it right. It definitely does not go from normal to butt sex, but it will progress there step by step. A horny boy will experiment. If that experimentation is degenerate they get acclimated to that degeneracy and the next time they are willing to go further. That is how grooming works.

[–]blackpoop321 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Right, that's on a personal level but also happens on a societal level. The more you let half-naked fags parade their degeneracy around for an entire month every year, the more you put groomer flags in classrooms, the more drag queens reading to children is normalized, the easier is it for groomers to appear "normal" to vulnerable youth.

[–]ihaveyourdress 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Gay, gay, gay.

[–]binaryblob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If I had to write an is_bot function, I would have it return True on "musky-the-nigger".

[–]Tom_BombadilBombadildo 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

How to spot a bot:

A username that ends with 4 random numbers.

Compare the gaymaxing threads on r/realincels with the fed essay in the "incel to trans pipeline" video for proof.

Trans pipeline? More like trans pipe removal.

I'm familiar with the OTO, but I haven't seen direct evidence of their involvement.
Do you have any links to their current gaymaxing schemes?

[–]Tom_BombadilBombadildo 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Anyone appearing at this site and endorsing the experimental injections is a bot suspect, and almost certainly a shill account.

Normie retards who believe the injections are beneficial will feel heavy cognitive dissonance when commenting here.

The accounts who persistently continue to push injection nonsense are either morally compromised, or bots.

They deserve to be injected with the full schedule of every brand and booster.
Let them eat their own dogfood.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[removed]

    [–]Tom_BombadilBombadildo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Geh

    [–]topiary2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Don't forget that these bots also preemptively challenge anything that challenges the establishment talking points who have done it so much that it is basically a script

    [–]ID10T 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    You sound like a China bot you weirdo. Plenty of real people disagree with your opinions. Feel free not to engage if you just want to live in a bubble.

    That being said, there are plenty of accounts everywhere that act like bots who only want to troll with stupid opinions and don’t care at all about listening to a reasoned argument against them. It’s a waste of time to engage with them.

    [–]EternalSunset 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Based

    [–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (26 children)

    Literally no one has said "Just gay-max bro, there's no opportunity-blackpill!" on saidit

    [–]Armedpleb 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (25 children)

    ActuallyBot

    [–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (24 children)

    The point I made was backed up with a link showing the term "gax-max" had never been used on this site. This is refutation or counter-argument on the pyramid of debate.

    You have responded with name-calling.

    Dragging down the conversation on the pyramid of debate is against saidit values.

    I have reported your comment, and encourage you to do better in the future.

    [–]Armedpleb 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (23 children)

    You got offended so easily just by me calling you ActuallyBot? Maybe you are a bot! I've been called worse things and didn't get offended.

    If you wanna succeed in reporting and banning people, go back to reddit. At least everyone there will agree with your opinions. I came to saidit to escape that shithole and I got tired of being silenced and banned all the time.

    I don't understand why you insist on coming to saidit when you'll be completely fine on reddit. If I argued with you on reddit, my comments would be removed and I would be banned. On saidit, everyone has the right to argue and disagree with what you say, but not on reddit. On reddit, whatever liberals say is absolute and no one is allowed to be against what they say.

    [–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (22 children)

    I'm not offended.

    But you offered nothing of value in your comment with respect to the material, and that is bad for saidit, and boring for this conversation.

    On saidit, everyone has the right to argue and disagree with what you say

    However, rational argument with evidence is well regarded and name calling is not.

    I encourage you to improve your comments by following saidit values. Particularly by being conscious of the pyramid of debate when you comment, and always trying to lift the conversation.

    [–]Armedpleb 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Lol, you called all my evidence as "fake" even if it is video evidence. Video evidence showing fraud and corruption being committed is more than rational. Banning anyone you disagree with is what is bad for saidit because then the existance of saidit is pointless if it is no different than reddit. You'll find what you're looking for on reddit and you'll get to report and ban whoever you want, even for something as silly as "name calling".

    [–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Lol,

    Chortle.

    you called all my evidence as "fake" even if it is video evidence.

    I called your project veritas videos fake. That's because they are.

    But that's also obvious because we know from the massive investigation by the GOP that there's no evidence to support impeachment.

    Banning anyone you disagree with is what is bad for saidit because then the existance of saidit is pointless if it is no different than reddit.

    Saidit values don't include banning anyone you disagree with. They do include banning people who continually drag down the discussion of the pyramid of debate, such as by name calling in response to a comment with linked evidence supporting the point.

    [–]Armedpleb 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    "But that's also obvious because we know him the massive investigation by the GOP that there's no evidence to support impeachment."

    Who's "him"? Your sentence seems kind of strange.

    [–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Thanks. Corrected.

    [–]Armedpleb 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

    I show you video evidence of liberals & democrats confessing & committing fraud & corruption on camera. You show me written fallacies.

    It's not just Biden, plenty of other liberals & democrats have confessed and committed fraud and corruption like Scott Foval (on camera of course). Did you not check the other video links? What about the non-Veritas videos?

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/xSlYEo6QtGkG/

    I am starting to think maybe you are a bot if you see video evidence as "fake" just because you said so and regardless of the crimes being confessed or committed on camera but written articles are true just because you said so.

    I am suprised you being called ActuallyBot triggered you so easily. With all the profanities and slurs I've seen on saidit, I guarantee you've been called worse things and probably didn't succeed in banning anyone, unless its on reddit.

    [–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

    I show you video evidence of liberals & democrats confessing & committing fraud & corruption on camera.

    I've explained several times that project veritas videos are manipulated.

    Project Veritas is an American far-right activist group founded by James O'Keefe in 2010. The group produces deceptively edited videos of its undercover operations, which use secret recordings in an effort to discredit mainstream media organizations and progressive groups.

    You seem to be having trouble understanding that a manipulated video is not hard evidence.

    You realize that the idea of manipulation of videos is to be misleading, right?

    What about the non-Veritas videos?

    I responded to the video about Biden.

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/xSlYEo6QtGkG/

    Yes. Sometimes people might send one member of a family to put the votes in a ballot box, instead of all driving down separately.

    Each vote is checked off on the role. One car stopping and putting several votes in the box is not indicative of fraud, and it's certainly not indicative of fraud by liberals & democrats.

    Recall that the Maricopa county recount increased Biden's margin by 360 votes compared to the official results.

    [–]Armedpleb 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

    ttps://www.bitchute.com/video/xSlYEo6QtGkG/

    How do you know they are turning in ballots for family members and are not just voting multiple times? With so many ballots being stuffed, I doubt their family is that big.

    Using hidden cameras to reveal liberals confessing about committing fraud on camera has nothing to do with manipulating anything.

    Wikipedia thinks Antifa & BLM is protests are "nonviolent/peaceful"

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Lives_Matter

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antifa_(United_States)

    "Most antifa political activism is nonviolent" " The slogan "Black Lives Matter" itself remains untrademarked by any group.[8] Despite being characterized by some as a violent movement, the overwhelming majority of its public demonstrations have been peaceful"

    How can you expect me to believe wikipedias written articles?

    "nonviolent/peaceful protest" my ass

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/PifrRn2neY9h/

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/5VzORb57J8s1/

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/i4RFJlq3QZjY/

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/n3h0Q7tqt0E4/

    Minneapolis

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/f0rH3zsAXPRP/

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/jbQmGLzZXRL7/

    Wisconsin

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/afDH8YHlTEkz/

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/-INtMzml9HQ

    [–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

    How do you know they are turning in ballots for family members and are not just voting multiple times?

    I don't know, but voting multiple times doesn't work, because each person on the role can only vote once, and the signatures are checked.

    My point is that your video does not prove or even suggest voter fraud, 6 extra votes wouldn't change the result, and there were more false votes for Trump then Biden in Maricopa.

    Using hidden cameras to reveal liberals confessing about committing fraud on camera has nothing to do with manipulating anything.

    Agree. However that's not what protect veritas does. They then edit the videos to make it look like people are saying things that they didn't say.

    nonviolent/peaceful protest" my ass

    You've got some videos of riots?

    I don't see how that proves that less than 93% of blm protests were peaceful.

    Please show your estimate of what proportion of BLM protests were peaceful, if you think you have evidence that the 93% figure is wrong.

    [–]Armedpleb 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    Dozens of voters voting multiple times WILL change the votes. Where's your proof of fraudulent votes for Trump in Maricopa?

    I've shown you the same links of Antifa and BLM burning down cities at least 3 times, but you never seem to respond when I show them to you. Is your bot brain confused?

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/PifrRn2neY9h/

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/5VzORb57J8s1/

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/i4RFJlq3QZjY/

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/n3h0Q7tqt0E4/

    Minneapolis

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/f0rH3zsAXPRP/

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/jbQmGLzZXRL7/

    Wisconsin

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/afDH8YHlTEkz/

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/-INtMzml9HQ/

    [–]Armedpleb 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    "What about the non-Veritas videos?

    I responded to the video about Biden.

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/xSlYEo6QtGkG/"

    Another weird sentence. You didn't have to say "I responded to the video about Biden"

    [–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    I'm not following what your issue is.

    I responded to the video about Biden in this comment:https://saidit.net/s/politics/comments/bmra/hard_evidence_warranting_the_impeachment_of_joe/14c3o

    How would you expect that to be said, and why does it make a difference?

    [–]Armedpleb 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    The longer the conversation goes, the more strange your grammar and sentences become. Sometimes they're non-sensical. I am starting to think you are a bot. I don't want to waste my breath arguing against a bot. Tell your master to stop using a bot like a coward and actually log in like a human being so we can have a more proper conversation. Otherwise, from now on I am going to ignore your replies. I should've listened, never engage with bots. What a huge waste of my time.

    [–]Tom_BombadilBombadildo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I had to look up one of those transmaxing videos.

    An Incels guide to transmaxxing How to get started

    I started laughing, because it seems like a parody. The guy even had a deep German accent. He started talking about female voice lessons, and it was a riot.

    But.. he kept going. With incredulously practical details about how to go GEH, because he believes failed as a incel (man).

    That's the baseline premise, right? He quit on manhood?

    Is it better to be a trans and spend your energy and resources trying to be a woman, and then what?

    Find a man?
    Or find some wacky and similarly unstable woman who wants a trans woman? Heavy irony on successfully scoring as a trans.

    There's a book called The Game. It's basically instructions on becoming an asshole Chad.

    It's effective, and also any changes you make to your personality with this method are fully reversible.

    These deluded incel characters would have triple the success rate, with half of the gender transformation effort.

    It will take work, but it can't be as difficult as rebranding your body HRT and surgeries, etc.

    It can not possibly be more challenging than that.

    [–]Armedpleb 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Most libtard accounts most likely are bots. I can't understand why liberals would want to come here when they'll be perfectly fine on reddit where their opinions will be respected and they won't be banned, unlike most of us who came here because we got tired of being silenced and banned just because our opinions do not match with the libtard agenda on reddit.

    [–]Armedpleb 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    The example of bots making "disinformation" accusations, reminds me of Saidit user Cunninglingus who accused all my video evidence of liberals confessing and committing voter fraud as "disinformation". So maybe Cunninglingus is a bot.

    [–]zyxzevn🐈‍⬛ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)