Their homophobic rage always increases when they're call out for it

submitted by ChunkeeguyTeam T*RF Fuck Yeah from twitter.com

all 21 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Poppy29252Natal Cat Woman 42 insightful - 1 fun42 insightful - 0 fun43 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Seeing men call themselves dykes and women call themselves faggots makes me rage inside like no other.

[–]TarshishJupiterpolitically homeless 28 insightful - 2 fun28 insightful - 1 fun29 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Oh, dry your eyes and be a big boy, you whiny little cissy!

Just wow.

[–]les4leshomonormative 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"Cissy" as a derogative term for gendercrits drives me insane, especially when it's pointed at gnc or gay men lmao. jackasses

[–]oofreesouloo⚡super lesbian⚡ 27 insightful - 1 fun27 insightful - 0 fun28 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I loved the part that he was accused of being a TERF. 😅 Its amazing. Whoever disagrees with them is automatically a woman and a radfem. Who knew there would be so many feminist women 😂

[–]FrostyNugsI'm allergic to nuts 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I wonder why so many of them are accusing him of being a woman. It couldn't possibly be projection, just look at all of those true and honest gay men. 🤔

[–]Seahorse 20 insightful - 6 fun20 insightful - 5 fun21 insightful - 6 fun -  (5 children)

Ooof they don't like that one bit.

I love how one of the replies was "Well then why is my Grindr inbox always full". Lmao please, gay transmen are forever complaining about never getting any action on grindr.

[–]MezozoicGayoldschool gay 18 insightful - 7 fun18 insightful - 6 fun19 insightful - 7 fun -  (1 child)

It is full of sadness and emptiness.

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It IS full of emptiness! As in that's the ONLY thing it could be full of. Kinda poetic really...

OK, it COULD be full of two other things: delusion... and more faux-bros like her.

Speaking of which, I think we all know what SHE'S full of. And it ain't gay dudes' dicks.

[–]julesburm1891 11 insightful - 5 fun11 insightful - 4 fun12 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

TQ is always saying A) no one will date or fuck them because they’re bigots and B) they’re getting laid by all the gays and lesbians so TERFs should shut up. You can’t have both, so which is it, pal?

[–]fuck_reddit 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Well, let’s use US legal rules of evidence. A is hearsay and so is B, but B is an admission against interests, so there’s an exception and B can be admitted as evidence. ( /s, but only kinda)

[–]jiljol 7 insightful - 6 fun7 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

I love how one of the replies was "Well then why is my Grindr inbox always full"

Who's gonna break it to her?

https://i.imgur.com/CHV9ZcQ.png

[–]julesburm1891 17 insightful - 4 fun17 insightful - 3 fun18 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Four for you, Jockstrap Ceiling Guy! You go, Jockstrap Ceiling Guy!

And none for TQ.

[–]RedEyedWarriorGay | Male | 🇮🇪 Irish 🇮🇪 | Antineoliberal | Cocks are Compulsory 18 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I love how he doesn’t back down. He needs to keep going. By standing up for himself, he’s standing up for all of us.

[–]ChunkeeguyTeam T*RF Fuck Yeah[S] 19 insightful - 1 fun19 insightful - 0 fun20 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I suspect he'll be banned. They can say all the vile things they like but god forbid anyone be guilty of twaaaaaaansphobia.

[–]RedEyedWarriorGay | Male | 🇮🇪 Irish 🇮🇪 | Antineoliberal | Cocks are Compulsory 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Of course Twitter will ban him. But the fact that he gets banned would prompt more gay men to speak out.

[–]8bitgay 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

https://twitter.com/BronSatyr/status/1301285500838465537

Check this comment thread. Kinda makes me want to make a twitter to go reply to this guy.

They always do this. They always use the example of a very feminine transwoman and a very masculine transman.

Why not use as example a feminine transman? Or are they saying that transmen are only valid when they're super masculine?

Why not use as example a masculine dude that identifies as female? Or are they saying that transwomen are only valid when they pass?

Why are they forgetting that masculine cis women and feminine cis men exist?

Edit: not to mention the transman picture even has a bulge lol Bulges are sexy because there is a real cock under the fabric. If a cis guy stuck a bunch of socks in his underwear it wouldn't be sexy, and a transman putting a piece of plastic in the underwear isn't sexy either.

[–]jiljol 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

And it's always the exact same people: the underwear model (who is really just a self-hating lesbian), Buck Angel (who is ironically very anti-modern TRA), etc lol.

I went into detail about this "gotcha" that they often use in another thread:

https://saidit.net/s/LGBDropTheT/comments/6bam/freedom_for_me_but_not_for_thee/ohcx?context=3

They love to parrot "BUT WHAT ABOUT THESE PEOPLE WHO CAN PASS!?". Well, we can actually use their hilarious logic against them. Let's do an exercise: Who in these photos is a "cis man", "trans man", "cis woman", etc?

https://i.imgur.com/amfTplU.png https://i.imgur.com/hWWTzha.jpg https://i.imgur.com/9mdrNiy.jpeg https://i.imgur.com/l3kP8fM.jpg

It doesn't matter because sexual orientation goes beyond the superficial. We are attracted to biological sex. A woman with naturally "strong" features in baggy clothes is not a male. A woman who spends thousands of dollars surgically and hormonally modifying her body is not a male. The very idea of "passing" as the opposite sex is irrelevant.

[–]8bitgay 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They complain about us being exclusionary, and sure, we are. But every definition of sexuality will be exclusionary. Our definition at least is being honest and we actually include a broader range than them.

Our definition: gay men are attracted to the male sex AKA cis men. This includes every expression of men, from the super masculine bearded dude to a cute feminine guy. Of course, not every gay man is into all "types", but all of them are valid.

Their definition: gay men are attracted to masculinity. To hell with men who don't conform to masculinity. Weirdly this definition excludes even non-masculine transmen.

Not to mention that our definition only excludes transmen from gayness. Another sexuality might be attracted to the female sex and transmen, it simply isn't gay men.

But if you actually follow their definition, it completely excludes non-masculine men. Gay men in their definition wouldn't be attracted to feminine men. Straight men wouldn't be attracted to feminine men either, since feminine men don't identify as female, and self-identification is important for them. So in their definition feminine men just exist in a limbo.

They worry so much about "being excluded", but if you follow their logic strictly you'd have to exclude many others.

But let's be honest: transmen don't care about feminine men, and transwomen don't care abut masculine women. A feminine men can be as feminine as he wants, he can make 0 effort to be masculine, and he'll still be a man, with a dick, and many actually gay men will feel attracted to him. This is pretty much the opposite of transmen.

[–]xanditAGAB (Assigned Gay at Birth) 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

do we have a links page so we can keep links like this handy?

[–]deliciousdogfoodmy name isnt a puppyplay reference i swear 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Talk about kicking a hornets nest.

[–]MarkJeffersonTight defenses and we draw the line 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

He has balls going against the wokerati.