‘Women’ or ‘vagina owners’? Teen Vogue’s publication of ‘masturbation guide’ mocked for advances in woke linguistics

submitted by ChunkeeguyTeam T*RF Fuck Yeah from rt.com

all 24 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]RippoffOfLoveSStraight | Overuses quotation marks 33 insightful - 9 fun33 insightful - 8 fun34 insightful - 9 fun -  (4 children)

If only there was a word for people who have vaginas... someone should come up with a word for that. Seems like it would be very handy!

[–]ArthnoldManacatsaman🇬🇧🌳🟦 27 insightful - 12 fun27 insightful - 11 fun28 insightful - 12 fun -  (3 children)

I hear 'wimpund' is the rage in Europe.

[–]RippoffOfLoveSStraight | Overuses quotation marks 20 insightful - 13 fun20 insightful - 12 fun21 insightful - 13 fun -  (2 children)

Wumben? W- w-.... woomud?

[–]LeaveAmsgAfterBeep 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Wombed?

[–]deliciousdogfoodmy name isnt a puppyplay reference i swear 8 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Wimwam?

[–]our_team_is_winning 31 insightful - 3 fun31 insightful - 2 fun32 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

I hope there isn't one actual teenage girl who reads that magazine. I think it is aimed at pervy middle aged men.

[–]millicentfawcett 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

I swear I remember some sort of survey a year or two back done by the magazine and PMAM were overwhelmingly their demographic (they may have identified themselves by other terms!)

[–]Athelhilda2 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

PMAM?

[–]NeedMoreCoffee~=[,,_,,]=^_^= 27 insightful - 2 fun27 insightful - 1 fun28 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Thats that same woman that thinks choking and bdsm is fine and people shouldn't kink shame all explained in a magazine for teenagers.

[–]oyasuminasai50 27 insightful - 2 fun27 insightful - 1 fun28 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

If and when there's some backlash against TRA rhetoric, I imagine it will look like this: feminists of the future who object to being dehumanized for the sake of being "inclusive" of a <0.5% of the population.

[–]deliciousdogfoodmy name isnt a puppyplay reference i swear 21 insightful - 11 fun21 insightful - 10 fun22 insightful - 11 fun -  (14 children)

masturbation guide

People need guides for that now?

[–]ChodeSandwichtender and moist 14 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

"Are you tired of being taught to disassociate from your body by creepy 'problem area' tutorials and vaguely insulting advertisements? Take a break and tuck in with a nominal guide to female pleasure that does the exact same thing, but written in Guilt Tripper's English lest you forget that whatever scrap of body confidence you have left is only so much undeserved cis privilege."

[–]yousaythosethingsFind and Replace "gatekeeping" with "having boundaries" 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Creepy pervtastic misogyny aside, I really think things like this are something that individuals should figure out on their own.

[–][deleted] 13 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

"A place for discussions for and by cis and trans lesbians, bisexual girls, chicks who like chicks, bi-curious folks, dykes, butches, femmes, girls who kiss girls, birls, bois, aces, LGBT allies, and anyone else interested"

So basically not "actual lesbians" after all?

Is there a same-sex space these low-lives haven't infiltrated?

[–]ChunkeeguyTeam T*RF Fuck Yeah[S] 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

No because they are real women and real men and therefore there's no reason for them to be excluded from anywhere. A transwoman's penis is a woman's penis. It's science sweaty.

[–]ColoredTwice 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That site is very homophobic, but this article is written decently.

It is like that in many magazines and charity organisations. National Partnership calling women as "birthing bodies", for example. Tampax calling us "people who bleed", and so on.

[–]Femaleisnthateful 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

How is 'vagina owners' any better? The guide assumes an association with other anatomical characteristics.

After all, what if the vagina owner also has a penis? Or doesn't have a clitoris? Does the guide still make sense?

They are implicitly referring to a sex class, so just say so.

Besides, are trans men reading Teen Vogue?

[–]Some-unoriginal-guy 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So you can purchase floating vaginas and own some? That's crazy But really, I hope this kind of language does not become widespread