I saw today Stonewall today mocking lesbians in their post on Twitter, and that made me angry, so I decided to make this post here.
Their post: https://twitter.com/stonewalluk/status/1381260798727716866
Stonewall, lesbophobic Diva (with their lesbian erasure with "queer women" instead of "lesbians" and "lesbians with penises") and GLAAD are promoting "Lesbian visibility week" - while being extremely hypocrytical.
Why Hyporcrytical? Lets see their reports and their fundings.
Stonewall last report:
Lesbians mentioned 3 times, one in "LGBTQ" fully written, one in conjunction with "trans women", and just 1 mentioned on themselves: https://i.imgur.com/YpcWng9.png
Gay men mentioned twice, one of which is in acronym "LGBTQ" written fully: https://i.imgur.com/AeiHb5G.png
Bisexual mentioned once: https://i.imgur.com/A5J2qEk.png
"Bi" mentioned three times, one is in "LGBTQ" fully writen: https://i.imgur.com/axmW3qB.png
So bisexual people mentioned 4 in total.
Transgender people mentioned 22 times (there "trans " with spacebar, so "transfer" not get into count") - one in "LGBTQ" fully written.
Queer mentioned zero times (wow!).
So total if remove LGBTQ fully mentions in latest yearly report of Stonewall: Lesbians 1 times, "trans lesbians" 1 time, gay men 1 time, bisexual 3 times, trans people 21 times.
GLAAD 2020 annual report:
Lesbians mentioned just twice, but both times as "LGBTQ" written fully, so total mentions - zero: https://i.imgur.com/d8CThZ7.png & https://i.imgur.com/CMlD6Mz.png
Gay men mentioned 7 times, two times as "LGBTQ" written fully: https://i.imgur.com/i1h1Ruw.png
Bisexual mentioned 8 times, same 2 times as part of "LGBTQ" written fully: https://i.imgur.com/VTL7v5q.png
Just "Bi" mentioned not a single time.
"Trans people", "trans man", "trans daughter" and similar mentioned 18 times: https://i.imgur.com/2FyciqH.png
Transgender mentioned 30 times, 2 times as part of "LGBTQ" written fully: https://i.imgur.com/L3BjVxx.png
So total for trans people 48 times, 2 as part of "LGBTQ".
Queer mentioned 5 times, 2 as part of fully written "LGBTQ": https://i.imgur.com/Sn4AU4C.png
So total for GLAAD without twice acronym "LGBTQ" written fully we have: lesbians 0 times, gay men 5 times, bisexual 6 times, trans people 46 times, queer 3 times.
TOTAL for both: Lesbians - 1 times, trans lesbians 1 times, gay men 6 times, bisexual people 9 times, transgender people 67 times, "queer" 3 times.
AND THEN those organisations have a nerve to say about "Lets have Lesbian visibility week"? Are they trolling? It is literally mocking.
Maybe start from YOURSELVES, f***ing Stonewall?!
Edit:
A bit more links.
Analysis of LGBT representation in reports of LGBT organisations in 2000-2018 years: http://users.ox.ac.uk/~sfos0060/LGBT_figures.shtml
Last Stonewall report: Very long link, so made it like text
GLAAD 2020 annual report: https://www.glaad.org/sites/default/files/AnnualReport_2020.pdf
Additional about hypocrisy and mocking: GLAAD is acronym for "Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation", yet they mentioned lesbians ZERO times.
[–]ColoredTwice 24 insightful - 13 fun24 insightful - 12 fun25 insightful - 12 fun25 insightful - 13 fun - (0 children)
[–]Elvira95Viva la figa 24 insightful - 5 fun24 insightful - 4 fun25 insightful - 4 fun25 insightful - 5 fun - (0 children)
[–][deleted] 23 insightful - 1 fun23 insightful - 0 fun24 insightful - 0 fun24 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]SilverWolf 23 insightful - 1 fun23 insightful - 0 fun24 insightful - 0 fun24 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]VioletRemiCat, homosexual one[S] 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]JoeyJoeJoe 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]JulienMayfair 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]VioletRemiCat, homosexual one[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]AugustiJade 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)