all 8 comments

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi.[S] 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

[–]Q-Continuum-kin 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks for the archive. It's interesting how much the author avoids the slightest indication of the TQ+ bringing in any negative connotation.

[–]Horror-SwordfishI don't get how flairs work 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This article highlights one of the main reasons why I don't like the term "queer:" it has no meaning whatsoever.

If you can lump a gay man, a trans "lesbian," a demisexual teen girl, and a married straight woman with three kids who kissed a girl once in college under the same term, it's not a helpful term to use! As a gay man, if I went to a meeting specifically for gay men only (and not trans men), I would expect that we would all have at least one thing in common with each other. If I went to a meeting for "queer people," there's a good possibility that there wouldn't be another gay man there.

Human like to categorize each other because it's sometimes helpful to do that. As a different example, I'm a fan of hiking. If I want to find a group of people to hike with, I'm going to go looking for "hikers" rather than "outdoor enthusiasts" because the second could include people who like to fish, bird watchers, campers, people who like to skinny dip in lakes, etc.

But then, I guess it's nice and easy to just say you're "queer" and get the brownie points, especially since it's a cardinal sin to ask anyone to prove what they're saying these days.

[–]MarkJeffersonTight defenses and we draw the line 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

I'm LGBTQAI2S+!

And that means?

I'm Queer!

Yeah, but what are you exactly?

Hey, Luv is luv and a spectrum! You will respec my Identitah!

Ok pls don't cancel me

[–]Aurelius 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Haha, this is mostly what I hear. It all sounds so convoluted that I never had the energy to follow along with the spectrum I just don't know how these people do it. When it used to be Female/Male, people had time to think about other things in their life...

[–]GenderSpecial 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Great opinion piece! Thanks for sharing

I think it’s also telling to read the top ‘Reader Picks’ comments vs the NYTimes selected reader comments. The reader comments overwhelmingly lean towards dropping the TQ+, while the editor selected comments favor “inclusivity” and ‘evolving language’.

[–]MarkJeffersonTight defenses and we draw the line 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

‘evolving language’

Code for "we're gonna mess with the established definition of everything important, so you won't know what's what anymore and we can take advantage of that confusion".

[–]automoderatorHuman-Exclusionary Radical Overlord[M] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

RIP Snappy, I AM THE NEW GOD!

Click below to view and/or archive snapshots:

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this sub if you have any questions or concerns.