Canadian Doctor: 62% of Patients Vaccinated for COVID Have Permanent Heart Damage

submitted by zyxzevn from globalresearch.ca

all 9 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]thefirststone 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I know that heart damage is a thing with these viruses and spike proteins in general, but I can't help wonder if this is another statistical lie that comes from testing. Just like almost nobody tests for flu or flu variant, even if they think they got the flu, nobody was testing for colds or SARS in the general population, and barely any in hospitals, before all this.

What if they would have found similar evidence of small-scale clotting if they were testing everybody before? Even now, this guy using the D-dimer test is rare compared to scans for large clots. Can he prove the damage was after?

Every test like this that illustrates that the doctors have no idea what the general population's baseline is on anything. Decades of lies about cholesterol should have proved that already.

[–]zyxzevn[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

The title was not accurate. The line should have been "could have" instead of just "have".

The tests illustrates that clotting is a major problem and should be researched extremely well.
But this is blocked by the companies and their politicians, probably because they know it is a huge problem.

For a disease with 99.97% survival a vaccine should not be dangerous at all.
And that is certainly not what we see.
So instead we should move to ivermectin, if we are serious about helping people.
Or just ignore this minor disease.

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Simpler, maintain your Vitamin D + C.

[–]thefirststone 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The title's irrelevant. His test is unreliable for his purpose, and even if it were, he can't prove the results were caused by either virus or vaccine.

He could construct a study with controls and everything while there are still unvaccinated people who haven't been driven out, but knowing Canada, he'd probably be arrested for trying.

[–]infocom6502 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I'm wondering whether gag orders in the medical community are common (by old standards), and from what level they ultimately are ordered (the private hospital, or from higher up, within government?) in today's seemingly Orwellian age.

I found this a bit shocking and can't think of how a gag order can be justified:

After he had administered about 900 doses of the Moderna experimental mRNA COVID-19 injections, he sounded the alarm over the severe reactions he was observing in his patients who chose to get the shot (he chose NOT to get it himself), which included death.

The result of him sounding the alarm was a gag order issued against him by the medical authorities in his community. He defied this gag order and was interviewed by Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson on her show where he sounded the alarm.

More from this link:

When Dr. Hoffe was given 900 doses of the Moderna experimental COVID-19 injections, he administered the doses through the Lytton Medical Clinic to those who wanted them.

He chose not to inject himself.

Dr. Hoffe reports that the result of injecting 900 people among the indigenous First Nations community was that 2 people went into anaphylactic shock, one person died, and several others have suffered what appear to be permanent disabilities. He relates how one of his patients is in so much pain now, that she prefers death to life.

By contrast, no one in the community died or became permanently disabled due to the COVID-19 virus for the past year.

[–]zyxzevn[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is clear that "Medical Authorities" are using gag-orders to hide the severe damage by the vaccines.

They want to push the experimental mRNA-vaccine into every body, so they need to reduce the resistance.
And for that they need to hide the millions of adverse reactions.

That way the "medical authorities" (or their friends) will have better sales.
There may be other goals: medical totalitarianism, push of passports, censorship, eugenics.

[–]zyxzevn[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Removed posts that did not read the text (or saw the video) at all.